Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study

Objective To evaluate the effects of competition and a bundled payment model on the performance of hip replacement surgery.Design A quasi-experimental study where a difference-in-differences analytical framework is applied to analyse routinely collected patient-level data from multiple registers.Set...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fanny Goude, Göran Garellick, Clas Rehnberg, Mikko Peltola, Henrik Malchau, Sverre Kittelsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-07-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e061077.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575655813840896
author Fanny Goude
Göran Garellick
Clas Rehnberg
Mikko Peltola
Henrik Malchau
Sverre Kittelsen
author_facet Fanny Goude
Göran Garellick
Clas Rehnberg
Mikko Peltola
Henrik Malchau
Sverre Kittelsen
author_sort Fanny Goude
collection DOAJ
description Objective To evaluate the effects of competition and a bundled payment model on the performance of hip replacement surgery.Design A quasi-experimental study where a difference-in-differences analytical framework is applied to analyse routinely collected patient-level data from multiple registers.Setting Hospitals providing hip replacement surgery in Sweden.Participants The study included patients who underwent elective primary total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis from 2005 to 2012. The final study sample consisted of 85 275 hip replacement surgeries, where the exposure group consisted of 14 570 surgeries (n=6380 prereform and n=8190 postreform) and the control group consisted of 70 705 surgeries (n=32 799 prereform and n=37 906 postreform).Intervention A reform involving patient choice, free entry of new providers and a bundled payment model for hip replacement surgery, which came into force in 2009 in Region Stockholm, Sweden.Outcome measures Performance is measured as length of stay of the surgical admission, adverse event rate within 90 days following surgery and patient satisfaction 1 year postsurgery.Results The reform successfully improved the adverse event rate (1.6 percentage reduction, p<0.05). Length of stay decreased less in the more competitive market than in the control group (0.7 days lower, p<0.01). These effects were mainly driven by university and central hospitals. No effects of the reform on patient satisfaction were found (no significance).Conclusions The study concludes that the incentives of the reform focusing on avoidance of adverse events have a predictable impact. Since the payment for providers is fixed per case, the impact on resource use is limited. Our findings contribute to the general knowledge about the effects of financial incentives and market-oriented reforms.
format Article
id doaj-art-5fc6dab06c1a4265ac7d9ef7913fe73a
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-5fc6dab06c1a4265ac7d9ef7913fe73a2025-01-31T18:10:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-07-0112710.1136/bmjopen-2022-061077Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental studyFanny Goude0Göran Garellick1Clas Rehnberg2Mikko Peltola3Henrik Malchau4Sverre Kittelsen5Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenCentre of Registers Västra Götaland, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Göteborg, SwedenDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, SwedenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USAFrisch Centre, Oslo, NorwayObjective To evaluate the effects of competition and a bundled payment model on the performance of hip replacement surgery.Design A quasi-experimental study where a difference-in-differences analytical framework is applied to analyse routinely collected patient-level data from multiple registers.Setting Hospitals providing hip replacement surgery in Sweden.Participants The study included patients who underwent elective primary total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis from 2005 to 2012. The final study sample consisted of 85 275 hip replacement surgeries, where the exposure group consisted of 14 570 surgeries (n=6380 prereform and n=8190 postreform) and the control group consisted of 70 705 surgeries (n=32 799 prereform and n=37 906 postreform).Intervention A reform involving patient choice, free entry of new providers and a bundled payment model for hip replacement surgery, which came into force in 2009 in Region Stockholm, Sweden.Outcome measures Performance is measured as length of stay of the surgical admission, adverse event rate within 90 days following surgery and patient satisfaction 1 year postsurgery.Results The reform successfully improved the adverse event rate (1.6 percentage reduction, p<0.05). Length of stay decreased less in the more competitive market than in the control group (0.7 days lower, p<0.01). These effects were mainly driven by university and central hospitals. No effects of the reform on patient satisfaction were found (no significance).Conclusions The study concludes that the incentives of the reform focusing on avoidance of adverse events have a predictable impact. Since the payment for providers is fixed per case, the impact on resource use is limited. Our findings contribute to the general knowledge about the effects of financial incentives and market-oriented reforms.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e061077.full
spellingShingle Fanny Goude
Göran Garellick
Clas Rehnberg
Mikko Peltola
Henrik Malchau
Sverre Kittelsen
Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
BMJ Open
title Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
title_full Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
title_fullStr Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
title_short Effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in Stockholm, Sweden: results from a quasi-experimental study
title_sort effects of competition and bundled payment on the performance of hip replacement surgery in stockholm sweden results from a quasi experimental study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e061077.full
work_keys_str_mv AT fannygoude effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT gorangarellick effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT clasrehnberg effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT mikkopeltola effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT henrikmalchau effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy
AT sverrekittelsen effectsofcompetitionandbundledpaymentontheperformanceofhipreplacementsurgeryinstockholmswedenresultsfromaquasiexperimentalstudy