Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block

At automated container terminals (ACTs), twin automated stacking cranes (ASCs) can carry out the tasks—store and retrieve containers simultaneously in a yard block using a handshake bay, where a primary ASC stacks the container at the handshake bay and the other crane carries it to the destination b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhi-Hua Hu, Xi-Dan Tian, Yu-Qi Yin, Chen Wei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Transportation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5738254
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561566136926208
author Zhi-Hua Hu
Xi-Dan Tian
Yu-Qi Yin
Chen Wei
author_facet Zhi-Hua Hu
Xi-Dan Tian
Yu-Qi Yin
Chen Wei
author_sort Zhi-Hua Hu
collection DOAJ
description At automated container terminals (ACTs), twin automated stacking cranes (ASCs) can carry out the tasks—store and retrieve containers simultaneously in a yard block using a handshake bay, where a primary ASC stacks the container at the handshake bay and the other crane carries it to the destination bay. Although the handshake bay increases the degree of crane utilization, the ASCs will interfere with each other at the bay, decreasing the stacking efficiency. This study formulates a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) to position the handshake bay and simultaneously schedule the twin ASCs to minimize the tasks’ makespan. The proposed formulation considers the safe time interval to avoid crane collisions during adjacent crane movements. To solve the model, we developed a random-key genetic algorithm with a priority-based decoding scheme to optimize the task sequences and tasks assigned to the cranes. The priority-based GA can always generate feasible solutions by ranking the container-handling tasks. Numerical experiments prove that the safe temporal interval affects the makespan and the handshake bay’s position. An optimal handshake bay reduces 35% of the makespan compared with a nonoptimal bay, and the proposed algorithm is competitive compared with the on-the-shelf MILP solver and can solve medium- and large-scale instances in short computing time with gaps lower than 5% compared with ideal solutions.
format Article
id doaj-art-5fc3a2e53c934f55b3db771cda3c8b77
institution Kabale University
issn 2042-3195
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Transportation
spelling doaj-art-5fc3a2e53c934f55b3db771cda3c8b772025-02-03T01:24:44ZengWileyJournal of Advanced Transportation2042-31952022-01-01202210.1155/2022/5738254Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard BlockZhi-Hua Hu0Xi-Dan Tian1Yu-Qi Yin2Chen Wei3Qingdao InstituteQingdao InstituteLogistics Research CenterLogistics Research CenterAt automated container terminals (ACTs), twin automated stacking cranes (ASCs) can carry out the tasks—store and retrieve containers simultaneously in a yard block using a handshake bay, where a primary ASC stacks the container at the handshake bay and the other crane carries it to the destination bay. Although the handshake bay increases the degree of crane utilization, the ASCs will interfere with each other at the bay, decreasing the stacking efficiency. This study formulates a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) to position the handshake bay and simultaneously schedule the twin ASCs to minimize the tasks’ makespan. The proposed formulation considers the safe time interval to avoid crane collisions during adjacent crane movements. To solve the model, we developed a random-key genetic algorithm with a priority-based decoding scheme to optimize the task sequences and tasks assigned to the cranes. The priority-based GA can always generate feasible solutions by ranking the container-handling tasks. Numerical experiments prove that the safe temporal interval affects the makespan and the handshake bay’s position. An optimal handshake bay reduces 35% of the makespan compared with a nonoptimal bay, and the proposed algorithm is competitive compared with the on-the-shelf MILP solver and can solve medium- and large-scale instances in short computing time with gaps lower than 5% compared with ideal solutions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5738254
spellingShingle Zhi-Hua Hu
Xi-Dan Tian
Yu-Qi Yin
Chen Wei
Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
Journal of Advanced Transportation
title Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
title_full Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
title_fullStr Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
title_full_unstemmed Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
title_short Positioning a Handshake Bay for Twin Stacking Cranes in an Automated Container Terminal Yard Block
title_sort positioning a handshake bay for twin stacking cranes in an automated container terminal yard block
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5738254
work_keys_str_mv AT zhihuahu positioningahandshakebayfortwinstackingcranesinanautomatedcontainerterminalyardblock
AT xidantian positioningahandshakebayfortwinstackingcranesinanautomatedcontainerterminalyardblock
AT yuqiyin positioningahandshakebayfortwinstackingcranesinanautomatedcontainerterminalyardblock
AT chenwei positioningahandshakebayfortwinstackingcranesinanautomatedcontainerterminalyardblock