Same, Same but Different: Proportionality Assessments and Equality Norms
Proportionality reasoning is an established form of legal argumentation under international human rights law, employed by the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations (UN) human rights treaty bodies alike. However, relatively little has been written about its precise role and content in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Anna Nilsson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Scandinavian University Press
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Oslo Law Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2020/03/same_same_but_different_proportionality_assessments_and_e |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES
by: OANA RĂVAŞ
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Gender equality and equal opportunity mechanisms in Italy
by: Mršević Zorica
Published: (2007-01-01) -
The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination in Shaping Constitutional Gender Dynamics and Safeguarding Family Life
by: Danėlienė Ingrida
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Two conceptions of legal principles
by: Spaić Bojan
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Vulnerability under Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
by: Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir
Published: (2017-01-01)