Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines

Abstract Background Chemical transfection is a widely employed technique in airway epithelium research, enabling the study of gene expression changes and effects. Additionally, it has been explored for its potential application in delivering gene therapies. Here, we characterize the transfection eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tony J. F. Guo, Wan Yi Liang, Gurpreet K. Singhera, Jasmine Memar Vaghri, Janice M. Leung, Del R. Dorscheid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-00945-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585635562520576
author Tony J. F. Guo
Wan Yi Liang
Gurpreet K. Singhera
Jasmine Memar Vaghri
Janice M. Leung
Del R. Dorscheid
author_facet Tony J. F. Guo
Wan Yi Liang
Gurpreet K. Singhera
Jasmine Memar Vaghri
Janice M. Leung
Del R. Dorscheid
author_sort Tony J. F. Guo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Chemical transfection is a widely employed technique in airway epithelium research, enabling the study of gene expression changes and effects. Additionally, it has been explored for its potential application in delivering gene therapies. Here, we characterize the transfection efficiency of EX-EGFP-Lv105, an EGFP-expressing plasmid into three cell lines commonly used to model the airway epithelium (1HAEo-, 16HBE14o-, and NCI-H292). Results We used six common and/or commercially available reagents with varying chemical compositions: Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000), FuGENE HD, ViaFect, jetOPTIMUS, EndoFectin, and calcium phosphate. Using L3000, 1HAEo- exhibited the highest transfection efficiency compared to 16HBE14o- and NCI-H292 (1HAEo-: 76.1 ± 3.2%, 16HBE14o-: 35.5 ± 1.2%, NCI-H292: 28.9 ± 2.23%). L3000 yielded the greatest transfection efficiency with the lowest impact on cellular viability, normalized to control, with a 11.3 ± 0.16% reduction in 1HAEo-, 16.3 ± 0.08% reduction in 16HBE14o-, and 17.5 ± 0.09% reduction in NCI-H292 at 48-hour post-transfection. However, jetOPTIMUS had a similar transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (90.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.94), but had significantly reduced cellular viability of 37.4 ± 0.11% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In 16HBE14o-, jetOPTIMUS yielded a significantly higher transfection efficiency compared to L3000 (64.6 ± 3.2%, p < 0.0001) but significantly reduced viability of 33.4 ± 0.09% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In NCI-H292, jetOPTIMUS yielded a lower transfection efficiency (22.6 ± 1.2%) with a significant reduction in viability (28.3 ± 0.9%, p < 0.0001). Other reagents varied significantly in their efficiency and impact on cellular viability in other cell lines. Changing the transfection mixture-containing medium at 6-hour post-transfection did not improve transfection efficiency or viability. However, pre-treatment of cell cultures with two rinses of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA improved transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (85.2 ± 1.1% vs. 71.3 ± 1.0%, p = 0.004) and 16HBE14o- (62.6 ± 4.3 vs. 35.5 ± 1.2, p = 0.003). Conclusions Transfection efficiencies can differ based on airway epithelial cell line, reagents, and optimization techniques used. Consideration and optimization of cell line and transfection conditions may be useful for improving nonviral genetic techniques in vitro.
format Article
id doaj-art-5affc2d5d9c3469d82b25063e28a99be
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6750
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-5affc2d5d9c3469d82b25063e28a99be2025-01-26T12:40:06ZengBMCBMC Biotechnology1472-67502025-01-0125111210.1186/s12896-025-00945-xOptimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell linesTony J. F. Guo0Wan Yi Liang1Gurpreet K. Singhera2Jasmine Memar Vaghri3Janice M. Leung4Del R. Dorscheid5Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaCentre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, Providence Healthcare Research Institute, University of British ColumbiaAbstract Background Chemical transfection is a widely employed technique in airway epithelium research, enabling the study of gene expression changes and effects. Additionally, it has been explored for its potential application in delivering gene therapies. Here, we characterize the transfection efficiency of EX-EGFP-Lv105, an EGFP-expressing plasmid into three cell lines commonly used to model the airway epithelium (1HAEo-, 16HBE14o-, and NCI-H292). Results We used six common and/or commercially available reagents with varying chemical compositions: Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000), FuGENE HD, ViaFect, jetOPTIMUS, EndoFectin, and calcium phosphate. Using L3000, 1HAEo- exhibited the highest transfection efficiency compared to 16HBE14o- and NCI-H292 (1HAEo-: 76.1 ± 3.2%, 16HBE14o-: 35.5 ± 1.2%, NCI-H292: 28.9 ± 2.23%). L3000 yielded the greatest transfection efficiency with the lowest impact on cellular viability, normalized to control, with a 11.3 ± 0.16% reduction in 1HAEo-, 16.3 ± 0.08% reduction in 16HBE14o-, and 17.5 ± 0.09% reduction in NCI-H292 at 48-hour post-transfection. However, jetOPTIMUS had a similar transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (90.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.94), but had significantly reduced cellular viability of 37.4 ± 0.11% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In 16HBE14o-, jetOPTIMUS yielded a significantly higher transfection efficiency compared to L3000 (64.6 ± 3.2%, p < 0.0001) but significantly reduced viability of 33.4 ± 0.09% (p < 0.0001) compared to L3000. In NCI-H292, jetOPTIMUS yielded a lower transfection efficiency (22.6 ± 1.2%) with a significant reduction in viability (28.3 ± 0.9%, p < 0.0001). Other reagents varied significantly in their efficiency and impact on cellular viability in other cell lines. Changing the transfection mixture-containing medium at 6-hour post-transfection did not improve transfection efficiency or viability. However, pre-treatment of cell cultures with two rinses of 0.25% trypsin-EDTA improved transfection efficiency in 1HAEo- (85.2 ± 1.1% vs. 71.3 ± 1.0%, p = 0.004) and 16HBE14o- (62.6 ± 4.3 vs. 35.5 ± 1.2, p = 0.003). Conclusions Transfection efficiencies can differ based on airway epithelial cell line, reagents, and optimization techniques used. Consideration and optimization of cell line and transfection conditions may be useful for improving nonviral genetic techniques in vitro.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-00945-xAirway epitheliumChemical transfectionOptimization
spellingShingle Tony J. F. Guo
Wan Yi Liang
Gurpreet K. Singhera
Jasmine Memar Vaghri
Janice M. Leung
Del R. Dorscheid
Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
BMC Biotechnology
Airway epithelium
Chemical transfection
Optimization
title Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
title_full Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
title_fullStr Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
title_short Optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
title_sort optimization of chemical transfection in airway epithelial cell lines
topic Airway epithelium
Chemical transfection
Optimization
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-025-00945-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tonyjfguo optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines
AT wanyiliang optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines
AT gurpreetksinghera optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines
AT jasminememarvaghri optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines
AT janicemleung optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines
AT delrdorscheid optimizationofchemicaltransfectioninairwayepithelialcelllines