Variation of the Side Chain Branch Position Leads to Vastly Improved Molecular Weight and OPV Performance in 4,8-dialkoxybenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene/2,1,3-benzothiadiazole Copolymers

Through manipulation of the solubilizing side chains, we were able to dramatically improve the molecular weight (Mw) of 4,8-dialkoxybenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene (BDT)/2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT) copolymers. When dodecyl side chains (P1) are employed at the 4- and 8-positions of the BDT unit, we ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert C. Coffin, Christopher M. MacNeill, Eric D. Peterson, Jeremy W. Ward, Jack W. Owen, Claire A. McLellan, Gregory M. Smith, Ronald E. Noftle, Oana D. Jurchescu, David L. Carroll
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Nanotechnology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/572329
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Through manipulation of the solubilizing side chains, we were able to dramatically improve the molecular weight (Mw) of 4,8-dialkoxybenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]dithiophene (BDT)/2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT) copolymers. When dodecyl side chains (P1) are employed at the 4- and 8-positions of the BDT unit, we obtain a chloroform-soluble copolymer fraction with Mw of 6.3 kg/mol. Surprisingly, by moving to the commonly employed 2-ethylhexyl branch (P2), Mw decreases to 3.4 kg/mol. This is despite numerous reports that this side chain increases solubility and Mw. By moving the ethyl branch in one position relative to the polymer backbone (1-ethylhexyl, P3), Mw is dramatically increased to 68.8 kg/mol. As a result of this Mw increase, the shape of the absorption profile is dramatically altered, with λmax = 637 nm compared with 598 nm for P1 and 579 nm for P2. The hole mobility as determined by thin film transistor (TFT) measurements is improved from ~1×10−6 cm2/Vs for P1 and P2 to 7×10−4 cm2/Vs for P3, while solar cell power conversion efficiency in increased to 2.91% for P3 relative to 0.31% and 0.19% for P1 and P2, respectively.
ISSN:1687-9503
1687-9511