Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury
Background: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted rowing (FES rowing) is a rehabilitation exercise used to prevent disuse osteoporosis, which is common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, its effect on bone loss prevention varied in SCI patients, potentially due to inconsistent lo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Bioengineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/75 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832589044778795008 |
---|---|
author | Ying Fang Karen L. Troy |
author_facet | Ying Fang Karen L. Troy |
author_sort | Ying Fang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted rowing (FES rowing) is a rehabilitation exercise used to prevent disuse osteoporosis, which is common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, its effect on bone loss prevention varied in SCI patients, potentially due to inconsistent loading. This study investigates the effect of ergometer setup and rowing speed on lower extremity loading during rowing. Methods: Twenty able-bodied participants and one participant with SCI rowed on an adapted ergometer with different speeds and setups. We calculated foot reaction force and knee moment for all participants, and tibiofemoral force for the rower with SCI. Results: Able-bodied rowers generated 0.22–0.45 body weight (BW) foot reaction forces, and a higher force was associated with a fast speed, forward seat position, and large knee range of motion (RoM). The rower with SCI had the greatest foot reaction force (0.39 BW) when rowing with a small knee RoM at a rear seat position, and the highest tibiofemoral force (2.23 BW) with a large knee RoM or at a rear seat position. Conclusions: Ergometer setup and speed both affect lower limb loading and should be further studied in more rowers with SCI. This can inform rehabilitation protocols to standardize ergometer configuration to improve bone health. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5a3263da7da2410d824f9f6415a86de1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2306-5354 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Bioengineering |
spelling | doaj-art-5a3263da7da2410d824f9f6415a86de12025-01-24T13:23:10ZengMDPI AGBioengineering2306-53542025-01-011217510.3390/bioengineering12010075Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord InjuryYing Fang0Karen L. Troy1Department of Physical Therapy, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL 60064, USADepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USABackground: Functional electrical stimulation-assisted rowing (FES rowing) is a rehabilitation exercise used to prevent disuse osteoporosis, which is common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, its effect on bone loss prevention varied in SCI patients, potentially due to inconsistent loading. This study investigates the effect of ergometer setup and rowing speed on lower extremity loading during rowing. Methods: Twenty able-bodied participants and one participant with SCI rowed on an adapted ergometer with different speeds and setups. We calculated foot reaction force and knee moment for all participants, and tibiofemoral force for the rower with SCI. Results: Able-bodied rowers generated 0.22–0.45 body weight (BW) foot reaction forces, and a higher force was associated with a fast speed, forward seat position, and large knee range of motion (RoM). The rower with SCI had the greatest foot reaction force (0.39 BW) when rowing with a small knee RoM at a rear seat position, and the highest tibiofemoral force (2.23 BW) with a large knee RoM or at a rear seat position. Conclusions: Ergometer setup and speed both affect lower limb loading and should be further studied in more rowers with SCI. This can inform rehabilitation protocols to standardize ergometer configuration to improve bone health.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/75FES rowingspinal cord injuryknee loadingknee biomechanics |
spellingShingle | Ying Fang Karen L. Troy Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury Bioengineering FES rowing spinal cord injury knee loading knee biomechanics |
title | Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full | Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury |
title_fullStr | Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury |
title_short | Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and Without Spinal Cord Injury |
title_sort | effect of adapted ergometer setup and rowing speed on lower extremity loading in people with and without spinal cord injury |
topic | FES rowing spinal cord injury knee loading knee biomechanics |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5354/12/1/75 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yingfang effectofadaptedergometersetupandrowingspeedonlowerextremityloadinginpeoplewithandwithoutspinalcordinjury AT karenltroy effectofadaptedergometersetupandrowingspeedonlowerextremityloadinginpeoplewithandwithoutspinalcordinjury |