The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores

Background: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tzu-Heng Huang, Wei-Ming Li, Hung-Lung Ke, Ching-Chia Li, Wen-Jeng Wu, Hsin-Chih Yeh, Yen-Chun Wang, Hsiang-Ying Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092966462400175X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832573214822236160
author Tzu-Heng Huang
Wei-Ming Li
Hung-Lung Ke
Ching-Chia Li
Wen-Jeng Wu
Hsin-Chih Yeh
Yen-Chun Wang
Hsiang-Ying Lee
author_facet Tzu-Heng Huang
Wei-Ming Li
Hung-Lung Ke
Ching-Chia Li
Wen-Jeng Wu
Hsin-Chih Yeh
Yen-Chun Wang
Hsiang-Ying Lee
author_sort Tzu-Heng Huang
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102 Patients with initial GS of six after biopsy were enrolled. Preoperative clinical variables and pathological variables were also obtained and assessed. The optimal cut-off points for significant continuous variables were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Upgrading was observed in 63 patients and non-upgrading in 39 patients. In the multiple variables assessed, smaller prostate volume (PV) (p value = 0.0007), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (p value = 0.0055), positive surgical margins (p value = 0.0062) and pathological perineural invasion (p value = 0.0038) were significant predictors of GS upgrading. To further explore preclinical variables, a cut-off value for PV (≤ 38 ml, p value = 0.0017) and PSAD (≥ 0.26 ng/ml2, p value = 0.0013) were identified to be associated with GS upgrading. Conclusion: Smaller PV and elevated PSAD are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading, whereas lead-time bias is not. A cut-off value of PV < 38 ml and PSAD > 0.26 ng/ml2 were further identified to be associated with pathological GS upgrading.
format Article
id doaj-art-59cfa9a89ed84a68b89e2e4bd2cd95c2
institution Kabale University
issn 0929-6646
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
spelling doaj-art-59cfa9a89ed84a68b89e2e4bd2cd95c22025-02-02T05:26:45ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462025-02-011242145150The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scoresTzu-Heng Huang0Wei-Ming Li1Hung-Lung Ke2Ching-Chia Li3Wen-Jeng Wu4Hsin-Chih Yeh5Yen-Chun Wang6Hsiang-Ying Lee7Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, 833401, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, 90054, Taiwan; Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80145, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80145, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 80756, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Address: No. 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Sanmin Dist., Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan.Background: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102 Patients with initial GS of six after biopsy were enrolled. Preoperative clinical variables and pathological variables were also obtained and assessed. The optimal cut-off points for significant continuous variables were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Upgrading was observed in 63 patients and non-upgrading in 39 patients. In the multiple variables assessed, smaller prostate volume (PV) (p value = 0.0007), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (p value = 0.0055), positive surgical margins (p value = 0.0062) and pathological perineural invasion (p value = 0.0038) were significant predictors of GS upgrading. To further explore preclinical variables, a cut-off value for PV (≤ 38 ml, p value = 0.0017) and PSAD (≥ 0.26 ng/ml2, p value = 0.0013) were identified to be associated with GS upgrading. Conclusion: Smaller PV and elevated PSAD are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading, whereas lead-time bias is not. A cut-off value of PV < 38 ml and PSAD > 0.26 ng/ml2 were further identified to be associated with pathological GS upgrading.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092966462400175XProstate biopsyProstate cancerProstate volume
spellingShingle Tzu-Heng Huang
Wei-Ming Li
Hung-Lung Ke
Ching-Chia Li
Wen-Jeng Wu
Hsin-Chih Yeh
Yen-Chun Wang
Hsiang-Ying Lee
The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Prostate biopsy
Prostate cancer
Prostate volume
title The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
title_full The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
title_fullStr The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
title_full_unstemmed The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
title_short The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores
title_sort factors impacting on gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low gleason scores
topic Prostate biopsy
Prostate cancer
Prostate volume
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092966462400175X
work_keys_str_mv AT tzuhenghuang thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT weimingli thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hunglungke thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT chingchiali thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT wenjengwu thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hsinchihyeh thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT yenchunwang thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hsiangyinglee thefactorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT tzuhenghuang factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT weimingli factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hunglungke factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT chingchiali factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT wenjengwu factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hsinchihyeh factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT yenchunwang factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores
AT hsiangyinglee factorsimpactingongleasonscoreupgradinginprostatecancerwithinitiallowgleasonscores