Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Growth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abeer M. Aljaadi, Rana H. Mosli, Ruba H. Eid, Dania H. Bin-Ali, Essra A. Noorwali, Reem O. Basaqr, Hala Al-Otaibi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:International Journal of Clinical Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546133896855552
author Abeer M. Aljaadi
Rana H. Mosli
Ruba H. Eid
Dania H. Bin-Ali
Essra A. Noorwali
Reem O. Basaqr
Hala Al-Otaibi
author_facet Abeer M. Aljaadi
Rana H. Mosli
Ruba H. Eid
Dania H. Bin-Ali
Essra A. Noorwali
Reem O. Basaqr
Hala Al-Otaibi
author_sort Abeer M. Aljaadi
collection DOAJ
description Growth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC practices among healthcare practitioners in SA. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 193 healthcare practitioners in SA who completed an online questionnaire that assessed their characteristics and practices related to the use of GC. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Participants reported using different GCs during the assessments, with the following distribution: GC of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (24%), GC of the World Health Organization (WHO) (22%), Saudi GC (21%), and more than one type of GC (30%). Among the participants, 62% recorded GC data for both sick and well child, and 72.5% used GC with new and follow-up children. Only 56% reported discussing the GC output with patients or parents. Adjusting for covariates, dietitians were more likely to use GC with new and follow-up patients (odds ratio (OR): 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 6.02) and regularly discuss GC output with patients/parents (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.43) compared to other healthcare practitioners. Our findings showed significant variability in the use of GC among healthcare professionals in SA. The limited adoption of Saudi GC warrants further investigation to address practice obstacles and monitor children’s growth.
format Article
id doaj-art-57a3cc62a0d64b38a03a7f4c94dabc85
institution Kabale University
issn 1742-1241
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Clinical Practice
spelling doaj-art-57a3cc62a0d64b38a03a7f4c94dabc852025-02-03T07:23:45ZengWileyInternational Journal of Clinical Practice1742-12412024-01-01202410.1155/2024/5521695Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional StudyAbeer M. Aljaadi0Rana H. Mosli1Ruba H. Eid2Dania H. Bin-Ali3Essra A. Noorwali4Reem O. Basaqr5Hala Al-Otaibi6Clinical Nutrition DepartmentDepartment of Clinical NutritionIndependent ResearcherClinical Nutrition DepartmentClinical Nutrition DepartmentClinical Nutrition DepartmentCollege of Agricultural and Food ScienceGrowth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC practices among healthcare practitioners in SA. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 193 healthcare practitioners in SA who completed an online questionnaire that assessed their characteristics and practices related to the use of GC. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Participants reported using different GCs during the assessments, with the following distribution: GC of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (24%), GC of the World Health Organization (WHO) (22%), Saudi GC (21%), and more than one type of GC (30%). Among the participants, 62% recorded GC data for both sick and well child, and 72.5% used GC with new and follow-up children. Only 56% reported discussing the GC output with patients or parents. Adjusting for covariates, dietitians were more likely to use GC with new and follow-up patients (odds ratio (OR): 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 6.02) and regularly discuss GC output with patients/parents (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.43) compared to other healthcare practitioners. Our findings showed significant variability in the use of GC among healthcare professionals in SA. The limited adoption of Saudi GC warrants further investigation to address practice obstacles and monitor children’s growth.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695
spellingShingle Abeer M. Aljaadi
Rana H. Mosli
Ruba H. Eid
Dania H. Bin-Ali
Essra A. Noorwali
Reem O. Basaqr
Hala Al-Otaibi
Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
International Journal of Clinical Practice
title Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort current practices in growth chart utilization among healthcare practitioners in saudi arabia a cross sectional study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695
work_keys_str_mv AT abeermaljaadi currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT ranahmosli currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT rubaheid currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT daniahbinali currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT essraanoorwali currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT reemobasaqr currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT halaalotaibi currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy