Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Growth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC pr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832546133896855552 |
---|---|
author | Abeer M. Aljaadi Rana H. Mosli Ruba H. Eid Dania H. Bin-Ali Essra A. Noorwali Reem O. Basaqr Hala Al-Otaibi |
author_facet | Abeer M. Aljaadi Rana H. Mosli Ruba H. Eid Dania H. Bin-Ali Essra A. Noorwali Reem O. Basaqr Hala Al-Otaibi |
author_sort | Abeer M. Aljaadi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Growth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC practices among healthcare practitioners in SA. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 193 healthcare practitioners in SA who completed an online questionnaire that assessed their characteristics and practices related to the use of GC. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Participants reported using different GCs during the assessments, with the following distribution: GC of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (24%), GC of the World Health Organization (WHO) (22%), Saudi GC (21%), and more than one type of GC (30%). Among the participants, 62% recorded GC data for both sick and well child, and 72.5% used GC with new and follow-up children. Only 56% reported discussing the GC output with patients or parents. Adjusting for covariates, dietitians were more likely to use GC with new and follow-up patients (odds ratio (OR): 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 6.02) and regularly discuss GC output with patients/parents (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.43) compared to other healthcare practitioners. Our findings showed significant variability in the use of GC among healthcare professionals in SA. The limited adoption of Saudi GC warrants further investigation to address practice obstacles and monitor children’s growth. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-57a3cc62a0d64b38a03a7f4c94dabc85 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1742-1241 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Clinical Practice |
spelling | doaj-art-57a3cc62a0d64b38a03a7f4c94dabc852025-02-03T07:23:45ZengWileyInternational Journal of Clinical Practice1742-12412024-01-01202410.1155/2024/5521695Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional StudyAbeer M. Aljaadi0Rana H. Mosli1Ruba H. Eid2Dania H. Bin-Ali3Essra A. Noorwali4Reem O. Basaqr5Hala Al-Otaibi6Clinical Nutrition DepartmentDepartment of Clinical NutritionIndependent ResearcherClinical Nutrition DepartmentClinical Nutrition DepartmentClinical Nutrition DepartmentCollege of Agricultural and Food ScienceGrowth charts (GCs) are essential tools for monitoring children’s growth and overall health status. The extent to which healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia (SA) use national and international GC, and adhere to standardized practices remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate current GC practices among healthcare practitioners in SA. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 193 healthcare practitioners in SA who completed an online questionnaire that assessed their characteristics and practices related to the use of GC. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Participants reported using different GCs during the assessments, with the following distribution: GC of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (24%), GC of the World Health Organization (WHO) (22%), Saudi GC (21%), and more than one type of GC (30%). Among the participants, 62% recorded GC data for both sick and well child, and 72.5% used GC with new and follow-up children. Only 56% reported discussing the GC output with patients or parents. Adjusting for covariates, dietitians were more likely to use GC with new and follow-up patients (odds ratio (OR): 2.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 6.02) and regularly discuss GC output with patients/parents (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.29, 5.43) compared to other healthcare practitioners. Our findings showed significant variability in the use of GC among healthcare professionals in SA. The limited adoption of Saudi GC warrants further investigation to address practice obstacles and monitor children’s growth.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695 |
spellingShingle | Abeer M. Aljaadi Rana H. Mosli Ruba H. Eid Dania H. Bin-Ali Essra A. Noorwali Reem O. Basaqr Hala Al-Otaibi Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study International Journal of Clinical Practice |
title | Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Current Practices in Growth Chart Utilization among Healthcare Practitioners in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | current practices in growth chart utilization among healthcare practitioners in saudi arabia a cross sectional study |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/5521695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abeermaljaadi currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT ranahmosli currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT rubaheid currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT daniahbinali currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT essraanoorwali currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT reemobasaqr currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy AT halaalotaibi currentpracticesingrowthchartutilizationamonghealthcarepractitionersinsaudiarabiaacrosssectionalstudy |