Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus
Three types of stainless steel (304 SS, 410 SS, and 2205 SS) were evaluated for their corrosion behaviors in microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) by Desulfovibrio ferrophilus strain IS5, a relatively new and very corrosive sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) strain. The incubation lasted for 7 d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Chemistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3268404 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832557019789262848 |
|---|---|
| author | Junlei Wang Hongfang Liu Pruch Kijkla Sith Kumseranee Suchada Punpruk Magdy El-Said Mohamed Mazen A. Saleh Tingyue Gu |
| author_facet | Junlei Wang Hongfang Liu Pruch Kijkla Sith Kumseranee Suchada Punpruk Magdy El-Said Mohamed Mazen A. Saleh Tingyue Gu |
| author_sort | Junlei Wang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Three types of stainless steel (304 SS, 410 SS, and 2205 SS) were evaluated for their corrosion behaviors in microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) by Desulfovibrio ferrophilus strain IS5, a relatively new and very corrosive sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) strain. The incubation lasted for 7 days in enriched artificial seawater at 28°C and the results showed that 410 SS had a rather large weight loss (6.2 mg/cm2) and a maximum pit depth (118 µm), but 2205 SS and 304 SS did not suffer from significant weight loss or pitting. Electrochemical tests indicated that 2205 SS was slightly more resistant to SRB MIC than 304 SS, while 410 SS was far less resistant. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-5739b2b39a7c46c9a43e9e87f464a159 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-9063 2090-9071 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Chemistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-5739b2b39a7c46c9a43e9e87f464a1592025-02-03T05:43:46ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90632090-90712021-01-01202110.1155/2021/32684043268404Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilusJunlei Wang0Hongfang Liu1Pruch Kijkla2Sith Kumseranee3Suchada Punpruk4Magdy El-Said Mohamed5Mazen A. Saleh6Tingyue Gu7Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for Corrosion and Multiphase Technology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USASchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, ChinaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for Corrosion and Multiphase Technology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USAPTT Exploration and Production, Bangkok 10900, ThailandPTT Exploration and Production, Bangkok 10900, ThailandResearch and Development Center, Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Dhahran 31311, Saudi ArabiaResearch and Development Center, Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Dhahran 31311, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for Corrosion and Multiphase Technology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USAThree types of stainless steel (304 SS, 410 SS, and 2205 SS) were evaluated for their corrosion behaviors in microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) by Desulfovibrio ferrophilus strain IS5, a relatively new and very corrosive sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) strain. The incubation lasted for 7 days in enriched artificial seawater at 28°C and the results showed that 410 SS had a rather large weight loss (6.2 mg/cm2) and a maximum pit depth (118 µm), but 2205 SS and 304 SS did not suffer from significant weight loss or pitting. Electrochemical tests indicated that 2205 SS was slightly more resistant to SRB MIC than 304 SS, while 410 SS was far less resistant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3268404 |
| spellingShingle | Junlei Wang Hongfang Liu Pruch Kijkla Sith Kumseranee Suchada Punpruk Magdy El-Said Mohamed Mazen A. Saleh Tingyue Gu Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus Journal of Chemistry |
| title | Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| title_full | Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| title_short | Comparison of 304 SS, 2205 SS, and 410 SS Corrosion by Sulfate-Reducing Desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| title_sort | comparison of 304 ss 2205 ss and 410 ss corrosion by sulfate reducing desulfovibrio ferrophilus |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3268404 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT junleiwang comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT hongfangliu comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT pruchkijkla comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT sithkumseranee comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT suchadapunpruk comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT magdyelsaidmohamed comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT mazenasaleh comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus AT tingyuegu comparisonof304ss2205ssand410sscorrosionbysulfatereducingdesulfovibrioferrophilus |