Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis
The innate immune system of Drosophila is activated by ingestion of microorganisms. D. melanogaster breeds on fruits fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, whereas D. virilis breeds on slime flux and decaying bark of tree housing a variety of bacteria, yeasts, and molds. In this study, it is shown t...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Genomics |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/542139 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832554491810938880 |
---|---|
author | Yosuke Seto Koichiro Tamura |
author_facet | Yosuke Seto Koichiro Tamura |
author_sort | Yosuke Seto |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The innate immune system of Drosophila is activated by ingestion of microorganisms. D. melanogaster breeds on fruits fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, whereas D. virilis breeds on slime flux and decaying bark of tree housing a variety of bacteria, yeasts, and molds. In this study, it is shown that D. virilis has a higher resistance to oral infection of a species of filamentous fungi belonging to the genus Penicillium compared to D. melanogaster. In response to the fungal infection, a transcriptome profile of immune-related genes was considerably different between D. melanogaster and D. virilis: the genes encoding antifungal peptides, Drosomycin and Metchnikowin, were highly expressed in D. melanogaster whereas, the genes encoding Diptericin and Defensin were highly expressed in D. virilis. On the other hand, the immune-induced molecule (IM) genes showed contrary expression patterns between the two species: they were induced by the fungal infection in D. melanogaster but tended to be suppressed in D. virilis. Our transcriptome analysis also showed newly predicted immune-related genes in D. virilis. These results suggest that the innate immune system has been extensively differentiated during the evolution of these Drosophila species. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5717f2b4707b4824ac6978f643bdf1b2 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2314-436X 2314-4378 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Genomics |
spelling | doaj-art-5717f2b4707b4824ac6978f643bdf1b22025-02-03T05:51:17ZengWileyInternational Journal of Genomics2314-436X2314-43782013-01-01201310.1155/2013/542139542139Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome AnalysisYosuke Seto0Koichiro Tamura1Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, JapanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-0397, JapanThe innate immune system of Drosophila is activated by ingestion of microorganisms. D. melanogaster breeds on fruits fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, whereas D. virilis breeds on slime flux and decaying bark of tree housing a variety of bacteria, yeasts, and molds. In this study, it is shown that D. virilis has a higher resistance to oral infection of a species of filamentous fungi belonging to the genus Penicillium compared to D. melanogaster. In response to the fungal infection, a transcriptome profile of immune-related genes was considerably different between D. melanogaster and D. virilis: the genes encoding antifungal peptides, Drosomycin and Metchnikowin, were highly expressed in D. melanogaster whereas, the genes encoding Diptericin and Defensin were highly expressed in D. virilis. On the other hand, the immune-induced molecule (IM) genes showed contrary expression patterns between the two species: they were induced by the fungal infection in D. melanogaster but tended to be suppressed in D. virilis. Our transcriptome analysis also showed newly predicted immune-related genes in D. virilis. These results suggest that the innate immune system has been extensively differentiated during the evolution of these Drosophila species.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/542139 |
spellingShingle | Yosuke Seto Koichiro Tamura Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis International Journal of Genomics |
title | Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis |
title_full | Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis |
title_fullStr | Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis |
title_short | Extensive Differences in Antifungal Immune Response in Two Drosophila Species Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analysis |
title_sort | extensive differences in antifungal immune response in two drosophila species revealed by comparative transcriptome analysis |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/542139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yosukeseto extensivedifferencesinantifungalimmuneresponseintwodrosophilaspeciesrevealedbycomparativetranscriptomeanalysis AT koichirotamura extensivedifferencesinantifungalimmuneresponseintwodrosophilaspeciesrevealedbycomparativetranscriptomeanalysis |