Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères

Our goals in this four-year study were to evaluate effects of moderate gymnastic practice on growth, fat mass, pubertal age, nutritionnal intakes, weight-control practice, psychological profiles, in matched-age 27 premenarche gymnasts and recreational sporting controls. G and C are gymnasts and cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mireille Bernard, Martine Beaussant, Fany Perroy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Société d'Anthropologie de Paris 2002-06-01
Series:Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/398
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579896690343936
author Mireille Bernard
Martine Beaussant
Fany Perroy
author_facet Mireille Bernard
Martine Beaussant
Fany Perroy
author_sort Mireille Bernard
collection DOAJ
description Our goals in this four-year study were to evaluate effects of moderate gymnastic practice on growth, fat mass, pubertal age, nutritionnal intakes, weight-control practice, psychological profiles, in matched-age 27 premenarche gymnasts and recreational sporting controls. G and C are gymnasts and controls, at the first year (G; C1) and at the fourth year (G4; C4). As most of gymnasts have dropped out (63%), we show the results of girls who have completed our study : 10 gymnasts and 20 controls.At the beginning of the study (T1), girls are 11,2 ± 0,9 years old. G1 training load is 11,9 ± 4,4 hours/week. Body mass index (BMI) of both groups are similar (17,0 ± 1,3 kg/m2) but G1 fat mass is lower. G1 and C1 nutritional intakes are similar (energy = 1649 ± 310 kcal/day; lipid = 38,8%; glucid = 46,2%). Protein intakes are high (1,9 ± 0,3 g/kg). Calcium and iron intakes are insufficient. G1 body dissatisfaction is low and weight-control practice is non-existent. Psychological profiles are the same in both groups.At time T4, BMI are the same (19,8 ± 1,9 kg/ m2) but G4 fat mass is lower (22,6 ± 3,1 vs 28,4 ± 5,7% ; p = 0,008). Both groups’ nutritionnal intakes do not increase from T1 to T4. Psychological profiles are the same, except that gymnasts’ asthenia increases and controls’ shyness with strangers decreases. Consultation for back and join complains concern 5/10 gymnasts; 8/10 stopped training because of injuries.In conclusion, moderate gymnastic practice does not seem to alter gymnasts physical and psychological development. It is necessary to be careful to improve gymnasts’nutrition and to decrease injuries.
format Article
id doaj-art-5699b6a580a84ac2aba9a0b4e35d988d
institution Kabale University
issn 1777-5469
language English
publishDate 2002-06-01
publisher Société d'Anthropologie de Paris
record_format Article
series Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
spelling doaj-art-5699b6a580a84ac2aba9a0b4e35d988d2025-01-30T11:27:52ZengSociété d'Anthropologie de ParisBulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris1777-54692002-06-0114210.4000/bmsap.398Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubèresMireille BernardMartine BeaussantFany PerroyOur goals in this four-year study were to evaluate effects of moderate gymnastic practice on growth, fat mass, pubertal age, nutritionnal intakes, weight-control practice, psychological profiles, in matched-age 27 premenarche gymnasts and recreational sporting controls. G and C are gymnasts and controls, at the first year (G; C1) and at the fourth year (G4; C4). As most of gymnasts have dropped out (63%), we show the results of girls who have completed our study : 10 gymnasts and 20 controls.At the beginning of the study (T1), girls are 11,2 ± 0,9 years old. G1 training load is 11,9 ± 4,4 hours/week. Body mass index (BMI) of both groups are similar (17,0 ± 1,3 kg/m2) but G1 fat mass is lower. G1 and C1 nutritional intakes are similar (energy = 1649 ± 310 kcal/day; lipid = 38,8%; glucid = 46,2%). Protein intakes are high (1,9 ± 0,3 g/kg). Calcium and iron intakes are insufficient. G1 body dissatisfaction is low and weight-control practice is non-existent. Psychological profiles are the same in both groups.At time T4, BMI are the same (19,8 ± 1,9 kg/ m2) but G4 fat mass is lower (22,6 ± 3,1 vs 28,4 ± 5,7% ; p = 0,008). Both groups’ nutritionnal intakes do not increase from T1 to T4. Psychological profiles are the same, except that gymnasts’ asthenia increases and controls’ shyness with strangers decreases. Consultation for back and join complains concern 5/10 gymnasts; 8/10 stopped training because of injuries.In conclusion, moderate gymnastic practice does not seem to alter gymnasts physical and psychological development. It is necessary to be careful to improve gymnasts’nutrition and to decrease injuries.https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/398female gymnastdevelopmentnutritional intakepsychological profileinjury
spellingShingle Mireille Bernard
Martine Beaussant
Fany Perroy
Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris
female gymnast
development
nutritional intake
psychological profile
injury
title Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
title_full Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
title_fullStr Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
title_full_unstemmed Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
title_short Développement physique et psychologique de gymnastes féminines prépubères
title_sort developpement physique et psychologique de gymnastes feminines prepuberes
topic female gymnast
development
nutritional intake
psychological profile
injury
url https://journals.openedition.org/bmsap/398
work_keys_str_mv AT mireillebernard developpementphysiqueetpsychologiquedegymnastesfemininesprepuberes
AT martinebeaussant developpementphysiqueetpsychologiquedegymnastesfemininesprepuberes
AT fanyperroy developpementphysiqueetpsychologiquedegymnastesfemininesprepuberes