Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring

Abstract Background APRV has been used for ARDS in the past. Little is known about the risk of ventilator- induced lung- injury (VILI) in APRV vs. BIPAP in the management of in COVID19-associated ARDS (CARDS). This study aimed to compare transpulmonary pressures (TPP) in APRV vs. BIPAP in CARDS in r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Emily Stoll, Tobias Leupold, Hendrik Drinhaus, Fabian Dusse, Bernd W. Böttiger, Alexander Mathes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-02-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02904-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571372333694976
author Sandra Emily Stoll
Tobias Leupold
Hendrik Drinhaus
Fabian Dusse
Bernd W. Böttiger
Alexander Mathes
author_facet Sandra Emily Stoll
Tobias Leupold
Hendrik Drinhaus
Fabian Dusse
Bernd W. Böttiger
Alexander Mathes
author_sort Sandra Emily Stoll
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background APRV has been used for ARDS in the past. Little is known about the risk of ventilator- induced lung- injury (VILI) in APRV vs. BIPAP in the management of in COVID19-associated ARDS (CARDS). This study aimed to compare transpulmonary pressures (TPP) in APRV vs. BIPAP in CARDS in regard to lung protective ventilator settings. Methods This retrospective, monocentric cohort study (ethical approval: 21-1553) assessed all adult ICU- patients with CARDS who were ventilated with BIPAP vs. APRV and monitored with TPP from 03/2020 to 10/2021. Ventilator-settings / -pressures, TPP, hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters were compared in both modes. Results 20 non- spontaneously breathing patients could be included in the study: Median TPPendexpiratory was lower / negative in APRV (-1.20mbar; IQR − 4.88 / +4.53) vs. positive in BIPAP (+ 3.4mbar; IQR + 1.95 / +8.57; p < .01). Median TPPendinspiratory did not differ. In APRV, mean tidal- volume per body- weight (7.05 ± 1.28 vs. 5.03 ± 0.77 ml; p < .01) and mean airway- pressure (27.08 ± 1.67 vs. 22.68 ± 2.62mbar; p < .01) were higher. There was no difference in PEEP, peak-, plateau- or driving- pressure, compliance, oxygenation and CO2- removal between both modes. Conclusion Despite higher tidal- volumes / airway-pressures in APRV vs. BIPAP, TPPendinspiratory was not increased. However, in APRV median TPPendexpiratory was negative indicating an elevated risk of occult atelectasis in APRV- mode in CARDS. Therefore, TPP- monitoring could be a useful tool for monitoring a safe application of APRV- mode in CARDS.
format Article
id doaj-art-54e4d50c6a5c49ec8398ad7f9b7d119a
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-54e4d50c6a5c49ec8398ad7f9b7d119a2025-02-02T12:39:58ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532025-02-012511910.1186/s12871-025-02904-7Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoringSandra Emily Stoll0Tobias Leupold1Hendrik Drinhaus2Fabian Dusse3Bernd W. Böttiger4Alexander Mathes5Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of CologneAbstract Background APRV has been used for ARDS in the past. Little is known about the risk of ventilator- induced lung- injury (VILI) in APRV vs. BIPAP in the management of in COVID19-associated ARDS (CARDS). This study aimed to compare transpulmonary pressures (TPP) in APRV vs. BIPAP in CARDS in regard to lung protective ventilator settings. Methods This retrospective, monocentric cohort study (ethical approval: 21-1553) assessed all adult ICU- patients with CARDS who were ventilated with BIPAP vs. APRV and monitored with TPP from 03/2020 to 10/2021. Ventilator-settings / -pressures, TPP, hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters were compared in both modes. Results 20 non- spontaneously breathing patients could be included in the study: Median TPPendexpiratory was lower / negative in APRV (-1.20mbar; IQR − 4.88 / +4.53) vs. positive in BIPAP (+ 3.4mbar; IQR + 1.95 / +8.57; p < .01). Median TPPendinspiratory did not differ. In APRV, mean tidal- volume per body- weight (7.05 ± 1.28 vs. 5.03 ± 0.77 ml; p < .01) and mean airway- pressure (27.08 ± 1.67 vs. 22.68 ± 2.62mbar; p < .01) were higher. There was no difference in PEEP, peak-, plateau- or driving- pressure, compliance, oxygenation and CO2- removal between both modes. Conclusion Despite higher tidal- volumes / airway-pressures in APRV vs. BIPAP, TPPendinspiratory was not increased. However, in APRV median TPPendexpiratory was negative indicating an elevated risk of occult atelectasis in APRV- mode in CARDS. Therefore, TPP- monitoring could be a useful tool for monitoring a safe application of APRV- mode in CARDS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02904-7Transpulmonary pressureCOVIDARDSSARS CoV-2CARDSAtelectrauma
spellingShingle Sandra Emily Stoll
Tobias Leupold
Hendrik Drinhaus
Fabian Dusse
Bernd W. Böttiger
Alexander Mathes
Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
BMC Anesthesiology
Transpulmonary pressure
COVID
ARDS
SARS CoV-2
CARDS
Atelectrauma
title Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
title_full Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
title_fullStr Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
title_short Comparison of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) versus biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ventilation in COVID-19 associated ARDS using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
title_sort comparison of airway pressure release ventilation aprv versus biphasic positive airway pressure bipap ventilation in covid 19 associated ards using transpulmonary pressure monitoring
topic Transpulmonary pressure
COVID
ARDS
SARS CoV-2
CARDS
Atelectrauma
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02904-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraemilystoll comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT tobiasleupold comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT hendrikdrinhaus comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT fabiandusse comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT berndwbottiger comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring
AT alexandermathes comparisonofairwaypressurereleaseventilationaprvversusbiphasicpositiveairwaypressurebipapventilationincovid19associatedardsusingtranspulmonarypressuremonitoring