Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial

Introduction. Diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Schlicker, Kiona K. Weisel, Claudia Buntrock, Matthias Berking, Stephanie Nobis, Dirk Lehr, Harald Baumeister, Frank J. Snoek, Heleen Riper, David D. Ebert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Diabetes Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2634094
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552978347720704
author Sandra Schlicker
Kiona K. Weisel
Claudia Buntrock
Matthias Berking
Stephanie Nobis
Dirk Lehr
Harald Baumeister
Frank J. Snoek
Heleen Riper
David D. Ebert
author_facet Sandra Schlicker
Kiona K. Weisel
Claudia Buntrock
Matthias Berking
Stephanie Nobis
Dirk Lehr
Harald Baumeister
Frank J. Snoek
Heleen Riper
David D. Ebert
author_sort Sandra Schlicker
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The aim of the study was to test whether disease-specific severity indicators moderate the treatment outcome in a 6-week minimally guided web-based self-help intervention on depression and diabetes (GET.ON Mood Enhancer Diabetes (GET.ON M.E.D.)) and to determine its effectiveness in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup. Methods. Randomized controlled trial- (RCT-) based data (N=253) comparing GET.ON M.E.D. to an online psychoeducation control group was used to test disease-specific severity indicators as predictors/moderators of a treatment outcome. Changes in depressive symptom severity and treatment response were examined in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup (CES−D>40; N=40). Results. Major depressive disorder diagnosis at the baseline (pprf6=0.01), higher levels of depression (Beck Depression Inventory II; pprpo=0.00; pprf6=0.00), and lower HbA1c (pprpo=0.04) predicted changes in depressive symptoms. No severity indicator moderated the treatment outcome. Severely depressed participants in the intervention group showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity (dprpo=2.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39-2.96) than the control condition (dprpo=0.92; 95% CI: 0.001-1.83), with a between-group effect size of dprpo=1.05 (95% CI: 0.11-1.98). Treatment response was seen in significantly more participants in the intervention (4/20; 20%) compared to the control group (0/20, 0%; χ2 2N=40=4.44; p<0.02). At the 6-month follow-up, effects were maintained for depressive symptom reduction (dpr6f=0.71; 95% CI: 0.19-1.61) but not treatment response. Conclusion. Disease-specific severity indicators were not related to a differential effectiveness of guided self-help for depression and diabetes. Clinical meaningful effects were observed in nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals, who do not need to be excluded from web-based guided self-help. However, participants should be closely monitored and referred to other treatment modalities in case of nonresponse.
format Article
id doaj-art-5321c04bc17b4be192e8127c4fd70fc0
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-6745
2314-6753
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Diabetes Research
spelling doaj-art-5321c04bc17b4be192e8127c4fd70fc02025-02-03T05:57:20ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67452314-67532019-01-01201910.1155/2019/26340942634094Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized TrialSandra Schlicker0Kiona K. Weisel1Claudia Buntrock2Matthias Berking3Stephanie Nobis4Dirk Lehr5Harald Baumeister6Frank J. Snoek7Heleen Riper8David D. Ebert9Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyGET.ON Institute GmbH, GermanyLeuphana University Lüneburg, GermanyUlm University, GermanyVU University, Amsterdam, NetherlandsVU University, Amsterdam, NetherlandsVU University, Amsterdam, NetherlandsIntroduction. Diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 are linked to higher prevalence and occurrences of depression. Internet-based depression- and diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) can be effective in reducing depressive symptom severity and diabetes-related emotional distress. The aim of the study was to test whether disease-specific severity indicators moderate the treatment outcome in a 6-week minimally guided web-based self-help intervention on depression and diabetes (GET.ON Mood Enhancer Diabetes (GET.ON M.E.D.)) and to determine its effectiveness in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup. Methods. Randomized controlled trial- (RCT-) based data (N=253) comparing GET.ON M.E.D. to an online psychoeducation control group was used to test disease-specific severity indicators as predictors/moderators of a treatment outcome. Changes in depressive symptom severity and treatment response were examined in a nonsuicidal severely depressed subgroup (CES−D>40; N=40). Results. Major depressive disorder diagnosis at the baseline (pprf6=0.01), higher levels of depression (Beck Depression Inventory II; pprpo=0.00; pprf6=0.00), and lower HbA1c (pprpo=0.04) predicted changes in depressive symptoms. No severity indicator moderated the treatment outcome. Severely depressed participants in the intervention group showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity (dprpo=2.17, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.39-2.96) than the control condition (dprpo=0.92; 95% CI: 0.001-1.83), with a between-group effect size of dprpo=1.05 (95% CI: 0.11-1.98). Treatment response was seen in significantly more participants in the intervention (4/20; 20%) compared to the control group (0/20, 0%; χ2 2N=40=4.44; p<0.02). At the 6-month follow-up, effects were maintained for depressive symptom reduction (dpr6f=0.71; 95% CI: 0.19-1.61) but not treatment response. Conclusion. Disease-specific severity indicators were not related to a differential effectiveness of guided self-help for depression and diabetes. Clinical meaningful effects were observed in nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals, who do not need to be excluded from web-based guided self-help. However, participants should be closely monitored and referred to other treatment modalities in case of nonresponse.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2634094
spellingShingle Sandra Schlicker
Kiona K. Weisel
Claudia Buntrock
Matthias Berking
Stephanie Nobis
Dirk Lehr
Harald Baumeister
Frank J. Snoek
Heleen Riper
David D. Ebert
Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
Journal of Diabetes Research
title Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
title_full Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
title_short Do Nonsuicidal Severely Depressed Individuals with Diabetes Profit from Internet-Based Guided Self-Help? Secondary Analyses of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial
title_sort do nonsuicidal severely depressed individuals with diabetes profit from internet based guided self help secondary analyses of a pragmatic randomized trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2634094
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraschlicker dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT kionakweisel dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT claudiabuntrock dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT matthiasberking dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT stephanienobis dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT dirklehr dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT haraldbaumeister dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT frankjsnoek dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT heleenriper dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial
AT daviddebert dononsuicidalseverelydepressedindividualswithdiabetesprofitfrominternetbasedguidedselfhelpsecondaryanalysesofapragmaticrandomizedtrial