High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes
Aims. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) leads to improvements in various markers of cardiometabolic health but adherence to HIIT following a supervised laboratory intervention has yet to be tested. We compared self-report and objective measures of physical activity after one month of independe...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Diabetes Research |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191595 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832561142144172032 |
---|---|
author | Mary E. Jung Jessica E. Bourne Mark R. Beauchamp Emily Robinson Jonathan P. Little |
author_facet | Mary E. Jung Jessica E. Bourne Mark R. Beauchamp Emily Robinson Jonathan P. Little |
author_sort | Mary E. Jung |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aims. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) leads to improvements in various markers of cardiometabolic health but adherence to HIIT following a supervised laboratory intervention has yet to be tested. We compared self-report and objective measures of physical activity after one month of independent exercise in individuals with prediabetes who were randomized to HIIT (n=15) or traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT, n=17). Method. After completing 10 sessions of supervised training participants were asked to perform HIIT or MICT three times per week for four weeks. Results. Individuals in HIIT (89 ± 11%) adhered to their prescribed protocol to a greater extent than individuals in MICT (71 ± 31%) as determined by training logs completed over one-month follow-up (P = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.75). Minutes spent in vigorous physical activity per week measured by accelerometer were higher in HIIT (24 ± 18) as compared to MICT (11 ± 10) at one-month follow-up (P = 0.049, Cohen’s d = 0.92). Cardiorespiratory fitness and systolic blood pressure assessed at one-month follow-up were equally improved (P’s < 0.05). Conclusions. This study provides preliminary evidence that individuals with prediabetes can adhere to HIIT over the short-term and do so at a level that is greater than MICT. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-4c7649a1acc248ad998ea49f1882d302 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2314-6745 2314-6753 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Diabetes Research |
spelling | doaj-art-4c7649a1acc248ad998ea49f1882d3022025-02-03T01:25:51ZengWileyJournal of Diabetes Research2314-67452314-67532015-01-01201510.1155/2015/191595191595High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with PrediabetesMary E. Jung0Jessica E. Bourne1Mark R. Beauchamp2Emily Robinson3Jonathan P. Little4School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, CanadaSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, CanadaSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, 210-6081 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, CanadaSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, CanadaSchool of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, CanadaAims. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) leads to improvements in various markers of cardiometabolic health but adherence to HIIT following a supervised laboratory intervention has yet to be tested. We compared self-report and objective measures of physical activity after one month of independent exercise in individuals with prediabetes who were randomized to HIIT (n=15) or traditional moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT, n=17). Method. After completing 10 sessions of supervised training participants were asked to perform HIIT or MICT three times per week for four weeks. Results. Individuals in HIIT (89 ± 11%) adhered to their prescribed protocol to a greater extent than individuals in MICT (71 ± 31%) as determined by training logs completed over one-month follow-up (P = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.75). Minutes spent in vigorous physical activity per week measured by accelerometer were higher in HIIT (24 ± 18) as compared to MICT (11 ± 10) at one-month follow-up (P = 0.049, Cohen’s d = 0.92). Cardiorespiratory fitness and systolic blood pressure assessed at one-month follow-up were equally improved (P’s < 0.05). Conclusions. This study provides preliminary evidence that individuals with prediabetes can adhere to HIIT over the short-term and do so at a level that is greater than MICT.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191595 |
spellingShingle | Mary E. Jung Jessica E. Bourne Mark R. Beauchamp Emily Robinson Jonathan P. Little High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes Journal of Diabetes Research |
title | High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes |
title_full | High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes |
title_fullStr | High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes |
title_short | High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes |
title_sort | high intensity interval training as an efficacious alternative to moderate intensity continuous training for adults with prediabetes |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/191595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maryejung highintensityintervaltrainingasanefficaciousalternativetomoderateintensitycontinuoustrainingforadultswithprediabetes AT jessicaebourne highintensityintervaltrainingasanefficaciousalternativetomoderateintensitycontinuoustrainingforadultswithprediabetes AT markrbeauchamp highintensityintervaltrainingasanefficaciousalternativetomoderateintensitycontinuoustrainingforadultswithprediabetes AT emilyrobinson highintensityintervaltrainingasanefficaciousalternativetomoderateintensitycontinuoustrainingforadultswithprediabetes AT jonathanplittle highintensityintervaltrainingasanefficaciousalternativetomoderateintensitycontinuoustrainingforadultswithprediabetes |