Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger
Bidirectional dc-dc converters are crucial for integrating electric vehicles (EVs) with the electrical grid, facilitating both grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle to grid (V2G) energy transfers. Nonetheless, effectively controlling bidirectional energy flow poses significant challenges. This study com...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/01/e3sconf_icegc2024_00027.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832098597512937472 |
|---|---|
| author | Oualifi Khadija Abouobaida Hassan Mchaouar Youssef Fathelkhair Abdelmoghit Akli Hajar Abouelmahjoub Younes |
| author_facet | Oualifi Khadija Abouobaida Hassan Mchaouar Youssef Fathelkhair Abdelmoghit Akli Hajar Abouelmahjoub Younes |
| author_sort | Oualifi Khadija |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Bidirectional dc-dc converters are crucial for integrating electric vehicles (EVs) with the electrical grid, facilitating both grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle to grid (V2G) energy transfers. Nonetheless, effectively controlling bidirectional energy flow poses significant challenges. This study compares two control methods, the conventional sliding mode controller (CSMC) and the integral sliding mode controller (ISMC), as applied to a bidirectional dc-dc converter. The dc-dc converter functions in two distinct modes: during grid to vehicle (G2V), it operates in buck mode to charge the battery using either constant current or constant voltage based on the battery’s voltage level; and during vehicle-to-grid (V2G), it switches to boost mode to discharge battery power into the grid at a constant current. The proposed controllers were simulated using MATLABK/Simulink and compared with a traditional linear PI controller. The simulation results highlight the efficiency and superiority of ISMC over both CSMC and PI control. In particular, ISMC offers superior performance in terms of response time and accuracy. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-4b26ea95a28e4906bed5e76e9cbdcbb7 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2267-1242 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | E3S Web of Conferences |
| spelling | doaj-art-4b26ea95a28e4906bed5e76e9cbdcbb72025-02-05T10:46:25ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422025-01-016010002710.1051/e3sconf/202560100027e3sconf_icegc2024_00027Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle chargerOualifi Khadija0Abouobaida Hassan1Mchaouar Youssef2Fathelkhair Abdelmoghit3Akli Hajar4Abouelmahjoub Younes5LabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityLabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityLabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityLabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityLabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityLabSIPE at National School of Applied Sciences, Chouaib Doukkali UniversityBidirectional dc-dc converters are crucial for integrating electric vehicles (EVs) with the electrical grid, facilitating both grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle to grid (V2G) energy transfers. Nonetheless, effectively controlling bidirectional energy flow poses significant challenges. This study compares two control methods, the conventional sliding mode controller (CSMC) and the integral sliding mode controller (ISMC), as applied to a bidirectional dc-dc converter. The dc-dc converter functions in two distinct modes: during grid to vehicle (G2V), it operates in buck mode to charge the battery using either constant current or constant voltage based on the battery’s voltage level; and during vehicle-to-grid (V2G), it switches to boost mode to discharge battery power into the grid at a constant current. The proposed controllers were simulated using MATLABK/Simulink and compared with a traditional linear PI controller. The simulation results highlight the efficiency and superiority of ISMC over both CSMC and PI control. In particular, ISMC offers superior performance in terms of response time and accuracy.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/01/e3sconf_icegc2024_00027.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Oualifi Khadija Abouobaida Hassan Mchaouar Youssef Fathelkhair Abdelmoghit Akli Hajar Abouelmahjoub Younes Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger E3S Web of Conferences |
| title | Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| title_full | Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| title_fullStr | Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| title_short | Comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc-dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| title_sort | comparative study of conventional sliding mode control and integral sliding mode control for a bidirectional dc dc converter in an electric vehicle charger |
| url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/01/e3sconf_icegc2024_00027.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oualifikhadija comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger AT abouobaidahassan comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger AT mchaouaryoussef comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger AT fathelkhairabdelmoghit comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger AT aklihajar comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger AT abouelmahjoubyounes comparativestudyofconventionalslidingmodecontrolandintegralslidingmodecontrolforabidirectionaldcdcconverterinanelectricvehiclecharger |