Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations

Abstract In this study, we compare the Energy Exascale Earth Systems Model (E3SM) multiscale modeling framework (MMF) with the cloud resolving model (CRM) configured in two (2dMMF) and three (3dMMF) dimensions. We explore how CRM dimensionality impacts the representation of mean and extreme precipit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei‐Ching Hsu, Gabriel J. Kooperman, Walter M. Hannah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004274
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583467589697536
author Wei‐Ching Hsu
Gabriel J. Kooperman
Walter M. Hannah
author_facet Wei‐Ching Hsu
Gabriel J. Kooperman
Walter M. Hannah
author_sort Wei‐Ching Hsu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this study, we compare the Energy Exascale Earth Systems Model (E3SM) multiscale modeling framework (MMF) with the cloud resolving model (CRM) configured in two (2dMMF) and three (3dMMF) dimensions. We explore how CRM dimensionality impacts the representation of mean and extreme precipitation characteristics. Our results show that tropical mean precipitation patterns are better represented in 3dMMF compared to observations (Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrivals for GPM and Global Precipitation Climatology Project One Degree Daily products), while 2dMMF better captures extreme precipitation intensity, with systematic land‐ocean differences in precipitation and cloud‐associated variables. These differences are attributed to the co‐occurrence of CRM throttling (i.e., suppressed convection in due to smaller numbers of CRM columns and domain size) and dilution (i.e., 3‐D cloud circulations with increased entrainment and lower precipitation efficiency) effects. Overall, throttling results in more low‐level humidity in 2dMMF and dilution contributes to more high clouds with less precipitation efficiency in 3dMMF. Since throttling occurs more strongly over the ocean than land, the 3dMMF tends to have less cloud liquid and precipitation over the ocean and more cloud ice and precipitation over land. These results may serve as a guide for choosing the CRM structure to reduce precipitation and cloud‐related biases.
format Article
id doaj-art-48f7aefd45104fc9afd0a0f4125322c5
institution Kabale University
issn 1942-2466
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
spelling doaj-art-48f7aefd45104fc9afd0a0f4125322c52025-01-28T13:21:09ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662025-01-01171n/an/a10.1029/2024MS004274Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model ConfigurationsWei‐Ching Hsu0Gabriel J. Kooperman1Walter M. Hannah2Department of Geography University of Georgia Athens GA USADepartment of Geography University of Georgia Athens GA USALawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore CA USAAbstract In this study, we compare the Energy Exascale Earth Systems Model (E3SM) multiscale modeling framework (MMF) with the cloud resolving model (CRM) configured in two (2dMMF) and three (3dMMF) dimensions. We explore how CRM dimensionality impacts the representation of mean and extreme precipitation characteristics. Our results show that tropical mean precipitation patterns are better represented in 3dMMF compared to observations (Integrated Multi‐satellitE Retrivals for GPM and Global Precipitation Climatology Project One Degree Daily products), while 2dMMF better captures extreme precipitation intensity, with systematic land‐ocean differences in precipitation and cloud‐associated variables. These differences are attributed to the co‐occurrence of CRM throttling (i.e., suppressed convection in due to smaller numbers of CRM columns and domain size) and dilution (i.e., 3‐D cloud circulations with increased entrainment and lower precipitation efficiency) effects. Overall, throttling results in more low‐level humidity in 2dMMF and dilution contributes to more high clouds with less precipitation efficiency in 3dMMF. Since throttling occurs more strongly over the ocean than land, the 3dMMF tends to have less cloud liquid and precipitation over the ocean and more cloud ice and precipitation over land. These results may serve as a guide for choosing the CRM structure to reduce precipitation and cloud‐related biases.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004274precipitationE3SMmultiscale modeling frameworkcloud resolving model
spellingShingle Wei‐Ching Hsu
Gabriel J. Kooperman
Walter M. Hannah
Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
precipitation
E3SM
multiscale modeling framework
cloud resolving model
title Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
title_full Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
title_fullStr Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
title_short Investigating Mechanisms Driving Differences in the Characteristics of Precipitation in the E3SM Multiscale Modeling Framework With 2D Versus 3D Cloud Resolving Model Configurations
title_sort investigating mechanisms driving differences in the characteristics of precipitation in the e3sm multiscale modeling framework with 2d versus 3d cloud resolving model configurations
topic precipitation
E3SM
multiscale modeling framework
cloud resolving model
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004274
work_keys_str_mv AT weichinghsu investigatingmechanismsdrivingdifferencesinthecharacteristicsofprecipitationinthee3smmultiscalemodelingframeworkwith2dversus3dcloudresolvingmodelconfigurations
AT gabrieljkooperman investigatingmechanismsdrivingdifferencesinthecharacteristicsofprecipitationinthee3smmultiscalemodelingframeworkwith2dversus3dcloudresolvingmodelconfigurations
AT waltermhannah investigatingmechanismsdrivingdifferencesinthecharacteristicsofprecipitationinthee3smmultiscalemodelingframeworkwith2dversus3dcloudresolvingmodelconfigurations