Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of setting a preferred retinal locus relocation target (PRT) and performing Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) biofeedback training in patients showing insufficient recovery of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) despite successful closure of an idiopathic macular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo, Mitsuya Otsuka, Yumiko Hayashi, Masaaki Ishida, Atsushi Hayashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/572942
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567994685849600
author Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo
Mitsuya Otsuka
Yumiko Hayashi
Masaaki Ishida
Atsushi Hayashi
author_facet Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo
Mitsuya Otsuka
Yumiko Hayashi
Masaaki Ishida
Atsushi Hayashi
author_sort Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of setting a preferred retinal locus relocation target (PRT) and performing Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) biofeedback training in patients showing insufficient recovery of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) despite successful closure of an idiopathic macular hole (MH). Methods. Retrospective interventional case series. Nine eyes of 9 consecutive patients with the decimal BCVA of less than 0.6 at more than 3 months after successful MH surgery were included. A PRT was chosen based on MAIA microperimetry and the patients underwent MAIA biofeedback training. BCVA, reading speed, fixation stability, and 63% bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were evaluated before and after the training. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired Student’s t-test. Results. PRT was chosen on the nasal side of the closed MH fovea in 8 patients. After the MAIA training, BCVA improved in all patients. The mean logMAR value of BCVA significantly improved from 0.33 to 0.12 (p=0.007). Reading speed improved in all patients (p=0.29), fixation stability improved in 5 patients (p=0.70), and 63% BCEA improved in 7 patients (p=0.21), although these improvements were not statistically significant. Conclusion. MAIA biofeedback training improved visual acuity in patients with insufficient recovery of BCVA after successful MH surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-465cad4b8d8145f2becb1545e16fd0ff
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-465cad4b8d8145f2becb1545e16fd0ff2025-02-03T00:59:57ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582015-01-01201510.1155/2015/572942572942Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole SurgeryTomoko Ueda-Consolvo0Mitsuya Otsuka1Yumiko Hayashi2Masaaki Ishida3Atsushi Hayashi4Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, JapanPurpose. To evaluate the efficacy of setting a preferred retinal locus relocation target (PRT) and performing Macular Integrity Assessment (MAIA) biofeedback training in patients showing insufficient recovery of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) despite successful closure of an idiopathic macular hole (MH). Methods. Retrospective interventional case series. Nine eyes of 9 consecutive patients with the decimal BCVA of less than 0.6 at more than 3 months after successful MH surgery were included. A PRT was chosen based on MAIA microperimetry and the patients underwent MAIA biofeedback training. BCVA, reading speed, fixation stability, and 63% bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) were evaluated before and after the training. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired Student’s t-test. Results. PRT was chosen on the nasal side of the closed MH fovea in 8 patients. After the MAIA training, BCVA improved in all patients. The mean logMAR value of BCVA significantly improved from 0.33 to 0.12 (p=0.007). Reading speed improved in all patients (p=0.29), fixation stability improved in 5 patients (p=0.70), and 63% BCEA improved in 7 patients (p=0.21), although these improvements were not statistically significant. Conclusion. MAIA biofeedback training improved visual acuity in patients with insufficient recovery of BCVA after successful MH surgery.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/572942
spellingShingle Tomoko Ueda-Consolvo
Mitsuya Otsuka
Yumiko Hayashi
Masaaki Ishida
Atsushi Hayashi
Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
title_full Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
title_fullStr Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
title_short Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery
title_sort microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/572942
work_keys_str_mv AT tomokouedaconsolvo microperimetricbiofeedbacktrainingimprovedvisualacuityaftersuccessfulmacularholesurgery
AT mitsuyaotsuka microperimetricbiofeedbacktrainingimprovedvisualacuityaftersuccessfulmacularholesurgery
AT yumikohayashi microperimetricbiofeedbacktrainingimprovedvisualacuityaftersuccessfulmacularholesurgery
AT masaakiishida microperimetricbiofeedbacktrainingimprovedvisualacuityaftersuccessfulmacularholesurgery
AT atsushihayashi microperimetricbiofeedbacktrainingimprovedvisualacuityaftersuccessfulmacularholesurgery