Reshaping consent so we might improve participant choice (II) – helping people decide
Research consent processes must provide potential participants with the necessary information to help them decide if they wish to join a study. On the Oxford ‘A’ Research Ethics Committee we’ve found that current research proposals mostly provide adequate detail (even if not in an easily comprehensi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Hugh Davies, Rosie Munday, Maeve O’Reilly, Catriona Gilmour Hamilton, Arzhang Ardahan, Simon E Kolstoe, Katie Gillies |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Research Ethics Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231176932 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
“So That They Might Turn”: The Possibility of Repentance in Jesus’ Parables
by: Leslie T. Hardin
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Deciding for Therapy: Deciding for Peace of Mind
by: Janyne Sattler
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.
by: Jean Daunizeau, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Patient reported measures of informed consent for clinical trials: A systematic review.
by: Katie Gillies, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
A Fatal Sepsis Caused by Hyaluronate Knee Injection: How Much the Medical History and the Informed Consent Might Be Important?
by: F. Manfreda, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)