GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study wa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Endocrinology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832562942919311360 |
---|---|
author | Minh Tam Le Dac Nguyen Nguyen Jessica Zolton Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen Quang Vinh Truong Ngoc Thanh Cao Alan Decherney Micah J. Hill |
author_facet | Minh Tam Le Dac Nguyen Nguyen Jessica Zolton Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen Quang Vinh Truong Ngoc Thanh Cao Alan Decherney Micah J. Hill |
author_sort | Minh Tam Le |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. A total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n=99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity. There was no difference in ovulation rates in either group receiving GnRHa or hCG trigger for ovulation. Biochemical and CPR were higher in patients who received hCG (28.3% and 23.2%) versus GnRHa (14.3% and 13.3%) (p=0.023, OR 0.42, 95%CI=0.21−0.86 and p=0.096, OR 0.51, 95%CI=0.24−1.07, respectively). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and infertility duration, there was no difference in CPR between the two groups (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.25, p=0.163). In conclusion, the use of the GnRHa to trigger ovulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction may be considered in patients treated with IUI. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-45a85065921344e7a12e74cfa8f64629 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8337 1687-8345 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Endocrinology |
spelling | doaj-art-45a85065921344e7a12e74cfa8f646292025-02-03T01:21:21ZengWileyInternational Journal of Endocrinology1687-83371687-83452019-01-01201910.1155/2019/24870672487067GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled TrialMinh Tam Le0Dac Nguyen Nguyen1Jessica Zolton2Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen3Quang Vinh Truong4Ngoc Thanh Cao5Alan Decherney6Micah J. Hill7Department of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USADepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USADepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USAThis study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. A total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n=99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity. There was no difference in ovulation rates in either group receiving GnRHa or hCG trigger for ovulation. Biochemical and CPR were higher in patients who received hCG (28.3% and 23.2%) versus GnRHa (14.3% and 13.3%) (p=0.023, OR 0.42, 95%CI=0.21−0.86 and p=0.096, OR 0.51, 95%CI=0.24−1.07, respectively). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and infertility duration, there was no difference in CPR between the two groups (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.25, p=0.163). In conclusion, the use of the GnRHa to trigger ovulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction may be considered in patients treated with IUI.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067 |
spellingShingle | Minh Tam Le Dac Nguyen Nguyen Jessica Zolton Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen Quang Vinh Truong Ngoc Thanh Cao Alan Decherney Micah J. Hill GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial International Journal of Endocrinology |
title | GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | gnrh agonist versus hcg trigger in ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination a randomized controlled trial |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minhtamle gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dacnguyennguyen gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jessicazolton gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vuquochuynguyen gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT quangvinhtruong gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ngocthanhcao gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alandecherney gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT micahjhill gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |