GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minh Tam Le, Dac Nguyen Nguyen, Jessica Zolton, Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen, Quang Vinh Truong, Ngoc Thanh Cao, Alan Decherney, Micah J. Hill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:International Journal of Endocrinology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562942919311360
author Minh Tam Le
Dac Nguyen Nguyen
Jessica Zolton
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Quang Vinh Truong
Ngoc Thanh Cao
Alan Decherney
Micah J. Hill
author_facet Minh Tam Le
Dac Nguyen Nguyen
Jessica Zolton
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Quang Vinh Truong
Ngoc Thanh Cao
Alan Decherney
Micah J. Hill
author_sort Minh Tam Le
collection DOAJ
description This study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. A total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n=99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity. There was no difference in ovulation rates in either group receiving GnRHa or hCG trigger for ovulation. Biochemical and CPR were higher in patients who received hCG (28.3% and 23.2%) versus GnRHa (14.3% and 13.3%) (p=0.023, OR 0.42, 95%CI=0.21−0.86 and p=0.096, OR 0.51, 95%CI=0.24−1.07, respectively). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and infertility duration, there was no difference in CPR between the two groups (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.25, p=0.163). In conclusion, the use of the GnRHa to trigger ovulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction may be considered in patients treated with IUI.
format Article
id doaj-art-45a85065921344e7a12e74cfa8f64629
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8337
1687-8345
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Endocrinology
spelling doaj-art-45a85065921344e7a12e74cfa8f646292025-02-03T01:21:21ZengWileyInternational Journal of Endocrinology1687-83371687-83452019-01-01201910.1155/2019/24870672487067GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled TrialMinh Tam Le0Dac Nguyen Nguyen1Jessica Zolton2Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen3Quang Vinh Truong4Ngoc Thanh Cao5Alan Decherney6Micah J. Hill7Department of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USADepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 06 Ngo Quyen Street, Hue, VietnamDepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USADepartment of OBGYN, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USAThis study is aimed at comparing clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) in patients who are administered either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for ovulation trigger in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted at Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. A total of 197 infertile women were randomly assigned to receive either GnRHa trigger (n=98 cycles) or hCG trigger (n=99 cycles) for ovulation trigger. Patients returned for ultrasound monitoring 24 hours after IUI to confirm ovulation. A clinical pregnancy was defined as the presence of gestational sac with fetal cardiac activity. There was no difference in ovulation rates in either group receiving GnRHa or hCG trigger for ovulation. Biochemical and CPR were higher in patients who received hCG (28.3% and 23.2%) versus GnRHa (14.3% and 13.3%) (p=0.023, OR 0.42, 95%CI=0.21−0.86 and p=0.096, OR 0.51, 95%CI=0.24−1.07, respectively). After adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and infertility duration, there was no difference in CPR between the two groups (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.25, p=0.163). In conclusion, the use of the GnRHa to trigger ovulation in patients undergoing ovulation induction may be considered in patients treated with IUI.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067
spellingShingle Minh Tam Le
Dac Nguyen Nguyen
Jessica Zolton
Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen
Quang Vinh Truong
Ngoc Thanh Cao
Alan Decherney
Micah J. Hill
GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
International Journal of Endocrinology
title GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short GnRH Agonist versus hCG Trigger in Ovulation Induction with Intrauterine Insemination: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort gnrh agonist versus hcg trigger in ovulation induction with intrauterine insemination a randomized controlled trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2487067
work_keys_str_mv AT minhtamle gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dacnguyennguyen gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jessicazolton gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vuquochuynguyen gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quangvinhtruong gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ngocthanhcao gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT alandecherney gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT micahjhill gnrhagonistversushcgtriggerinovulationinductionwithintrauterineinseminationarandomizedcontrolledtrial