Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene

An environmentally reoriented educational policy is oftentimes regarded as the premier locus for a societal response to the climate crisis. As observed by Gough (2021), a general belief shared among both policy makers and academics is a consensus that education needs to be perceived less as an inst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Audrius Pocius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/acta-paedagogica-vilnensia/article/view/38426
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593382160990208
author Audrius Pocius
author_facet Audrius Pocius
author_sort Audrius Pocius
collection DOAJ
description An environmentally reoriented educational policy is oftentimes regarded as the premier locus for a societal response to the climate crisis. As observed by Gough (2021), a general belief shared among both policy makers and academics is a consensus that education needs to be perceived less as an instrument for securing sociocultural reproduction and transmission of existing knowledge and more as a catalyst for social and cultural change. The aim of this article is a critical investigation into possibilities and obstacles for education to achieve such change, given the condition of ‘ontological insecurity’ (Hamilton, 2017) that the Anthropocene implies. It is divided into three parts: 1) following Chakrabarty, I identify the politico-aesthetic challenges posed by anthropogenic climate change and formulate their relevance as an educational ordeal; 2) I enquire about the challenges and possibilities for environmental education to foster societal change and conclude that, while a general policy change toward sustainable education may be insufficient, education remains a premier site where negotiations could take place between the deep-seated beliefs about subjectivity and an open anticipation of unforeseen modes of agency; 3) after providing a comparative analysis of classical humanist Bildung and post-humanist accounts of subjectification in education, I conclude that these approaches constitute a performative contradiction, which allows the experiential challenges of the Anthropocene to be approached in terms of a reimagined aesthetic education thematized as a critique of (human) capacity.
format Article
id doaj-art-44dbda848a3044c59012da9f41682a97
institution Kabale University
issn 1392-5016
1648-665X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia
spelling doaj-art-44dbda848a3044c59012da9f41682a972025-01-20T18:08:18ZengVilnius University PressActa Paedagogica Vilnensia1392-50161648-665X2025-01-015310.15388/ActPaed.2024.53.4Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the AnthropoceneAudrius Pocius0Vilnius University, Lithuania An environmentally reoriented educational policy is oftentimes regarded as the premier locus for a societal response to the climate crisis. As observed by Gough (2021), a general belief shared among both policy makers and academics is a consensus that education needs to be perceived less as an instrument for securing sociocultural reproduction and transmission of existing knowledge and more as a catalyst for social and cultural change. The aim of this article is a critical investigation into possibilities and obstacles for education to achieve such change, given the condition of ‘ontological insecurity’ (Hamilton, 2017) that the Anthropocene implies. It is divided into three parts: 1) following Chakrabarty, I identify the politico-aesthetic challenges posed by anthropogenic climate change and formulate their relevance as an educational ordeal; 2) I enquire about the challenges and possibilities for environmental education to foster societal change and conclude that, while a general policy change toward sustainable education may be insufficient, education remains a premier site where negotiations could take place between the deep-seated beliefs about subjectivity and an open anticipation of unforeseen modes of agency; 3) after providing a comparative analysis of classical humanist Bildung and post-humanist accounts of subjectification in education, I conclude that these approaches constitute a performative contradiction, which allows the experiential challenges of the Anthropocene to be approached in terms of a reimagined aesthetic education thematized as a critique of (human) capacity. https://www.journals.vu.lt/acta-paedagogica-vilnensia/article/view/38426educationontological insecurityenvironmental and sustainable educationperformative contradictionsubjectification
spellingShingle Audrius Pocius
Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia
education
ontological insecurity
environmental and sustainable education
performative contradiction
subjectification
title Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
title_full Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
title_fullStr Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
title_full_unstemmed Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
title_short Education as Performative Contradiction: Limits (And Possibilities) of Subjectification in the Anthropocene
title_sort education as performative contradiction limits and possibilities of subjectification in the anthropocene
topic education
ontological insecurity
environmental and sustainable education
performative contradiction
subjectification
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/acta-paedagogica-vilnensia/article/view/38426
work_keys_str_mv AT audriuspocius educationasperformativecontradictionlimitsandpossibilitiesofsubjectificationintheanthropocene