Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain

Differentially mapping snow depth in mountain watersheds from airborne laser altimetry is a valuable hydrologic technique that has seen an expanded use in recent years. Additionally, lidar systems also record the strength of the returned light pulse (i.e. intensity), which can be used to characteriz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsea Ackroyd, Christopher P. Donahue, Brian Menounos, S. McKenzie Skiles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:GIScience & Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2024.2427326
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593850499072000
author Chelsea Ackroyd
Christopher P. Donahue
Brian Menounos
S. McKenzie Skiles
author_facet Chelsea Ackroyd
Christopher P. Donahue
Brian Menounos
S. McKenzie Skiles
author_sort Chelsea Ackroyd
collection DOAJ
description Differentially mapping snow depth in mountain watersheds from airborne laser altimetry is a valuable hydrologic technique that has seen an expanded use in recent years. Additionally, lidar systems also record the strength of the returned light pulse (i.e. intensity), which can be used to characterize snow surface properties. For near-infrared lidar systems, return intensity is relatively high over snow and inversely related to the effective grain size, a primary control on snow albedo. Raw intensity is also sensitive to laser range and incidence angle, however, and requires a correction for snow property retrieval that is especially pertinent in mountainous terrain. Here, we describe a workflow to correct the intensity using the plane trajectory, lidar scan angle, and lidar-derived topography. As a proof of concept for snow retrievals, we apply the workflow to an airborne 1064 nm lidar flight over a snow-covered mountain basin in the Colorado Rockies. Corrected intensity was empirically related to reflectance before delineating snow extent and retrieving grain size. Relative to the traditional snow classification derived from optical imagery, the lidar-derived snow extent covered 5.4% more area due to the fine resolution point cloud and absence of shadows common in optical imagery. The lidar-derived grain size retrievals had a MAE of 32 µm compared to those from field spectroscopy, which translated to a 1% error in snow albedo. We found high incidence angles yielded an overcorrection in intensity that introduced a high bias in the grain size distribution and, therefore, suggest using an incidence angle threshold (40°). Developing methods specifically for quantitative snow surface property retrievals from lidar intensity is timely and relevant as aerial lidar is increasingly being used to map snow depth for hydrologic and cryospheric studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-3b24c83d5f1541a4a8f184ce4d1242a7
institution Kabale University
issn 1548-1603
1943-7226
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series GIScience & Remote Sensing
spelling doaj-art-3b24c83d5f1541a4a8f184ce4d1242a72025-01-20T08:36:26ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGIScience & Remote Sensing1548-16031943-72262024-12-0161110.1080/15481603.2024.2427326Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrainChelsea Ackroyd0Christopher P. Donahue1Brian Menounos2S. McKenzie Skiles3School of Environment, Society & Sustainability, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USADepartment of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, CanadaDepartment of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, CanadaSchool of Environment, Society & Sustainability, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USADifferentially mapping snow depth in mountain watersheds from airborne laser altimetry is a valuable hydrologic technique that has seen an expanded use in recent years. Additionally, lidar systems also record the strength of the returned light pulse (i.e. intensity), which can be used to characterize snow surface properties. For near-infrared lidar systems, return intensity is relatively high over snow and inversely related to the effective grain size, a primary control on snow albedo. Raw intensity is also sensitive to laser range and incidence angle, however, and requires a correction for snow property retrieval that is especially pertinent in mountainous terrain. Here, we describe a workflow to correct the intensity using the plane trajectory, lidar scan angle, and lidar-derived topography. As a proof of concept for snow retrievals, we apply the workflow to an airborne 1064 nm lidar flight over a snow-covered mountain basin in the Colorado Rockies. Corrected intensity was empirically related to reflectance before delineating snow extent and retrieving grain size. Relative to the traditional snow classification derived from optical imagery, the lidar-derived snow extent covered 5.4% more area due to the fine resolution point cloud and absence of shadows common in optical imagery. The lidar-derived grain size retrievals had a MAE of 32 µm compared to those from field spectroscopy, which translated to a 1% error in snow albedo. We found high incidence angles yielded an overcorrection in intensity that introduced a high bias in the grain size distribution and, therefore, suggest using an incidence angle threshold (40°). Developing methods specifically for quantitative snow surface property retrievals from lidar intensity is timely and relevant as aerial lidar is increasingly being used to map snow depth for hydrologic and cryospheric studies.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2024.2427326Lidarlidar intensitysnowsnow grain sizetopographic correction
spellingShingle Chelsea Ackroyd
Christopher P. Donahue
Brian Menounos
S. McKenzie Skiles
Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
GIScience & Remote Sensing
Lidar
lidar intensity
snow
snow grain size
topographic correction
title Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
title_full Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
title_fullStr Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
title_full_unstemmed Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
title_short Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
title_sort airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain
topic Lidar
lidar intensity
snow
snow grain size
topographic correction
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/15481603.2024.2427326
work_keys_str_mv AT chelseaackroyd airbornelidarintensitycorrectionformappingsnowcoverextentandeffectivegrainsizeinmountainousterrain
AT christopherpdonahue airbornelidarintensitycorrectionformappingsnowcoverextentandeffectivegrainsizeinmountainousterrain
AT brianmenounos airbornelidarintensitycorrectionformappingsnowcoverextentandeffectivegrainsizeinmountainousterrain
AT smckenzieskiles airbornelidarintensitycorrectionformappingsnowcoverextentandeffectivegrainsizeinmountainousterrain