Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer

Objectives. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) outcomes for testis cancer originate mostly from single-center series. We characterized population-based utilization, costs, and outcomes and assessed whether higher volume affects outcomes. Methods and Materials. Using the US Nationwide Inp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hua-yin Yu, Nathanael D. Hevelone, Sunil Patel, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Jim C. Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189823
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551727351463936
author Hua-yin Yu
Nathanael D. Hevelone
Sunil Patel
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Jim C. Hu
author_facet Hua-yin Yu
Nathanael D. Hevelone
Sunil Patel
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Jim C. Hu
author_sort Hua-yin Yu
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) outcomes for testis cancer originate mostly from single-center series. We characterized population-based utilization, costs, and outcomes and assessed whether higher volume affects outcomes. Methods and Materials. Using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001–2008, we identified 993 RPLND and used propensity score methods to assess utilization, costs, and inpatient outcomes based on hospital surgical volume. Results. 51.6% of RPLND were performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year. RPLND was more commonly performed at large urban teaching hospitals, where men were younger, more likely to be white and earning incomes exceeding the 50th percentile (all P≤.05). Higher hospital volumes were associated with fewer complications and more routine home discharges (all P≤.047). However, higher volume hospitals had more transfusions (P=.004) and incurred $1,435 more in median costs (P<.001). Limitations include inability to adjust for tumor characteristics and absence of outpatient outcomes. Conclusions. Sociodemographic differences exist between high versus low volume RPLND hospitals. Although higher volume hospitals had more transfusions and higher costs, perhaps due to more complex cases, they experienced fewer complications. However, most RPLND are performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year.
format Article
id doaj-art-37966f47e8cc4a738fc71091d9f1b931
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6369
1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-37966f47e8cc4a738fc71091d9f1b9312025-02-03T06:00:35ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63691687-63772012-01-01201210.1155/2012/189823189823Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis CancerHua-yin Yu0Nathanael D. Hevelone1Sunil Patel2Stuart R. Lipsitz3Jim C. Hu4Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4420, Boston, MA 02130, USACenter for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4420, Boston, MA 02130, USADivision of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4420, Boston, MA 02130, USACenter for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1153 Centre Street, Suite 4420, Boston, MA 02130, USADepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAObjectives. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) outcomes for testis cancer originate mostly from single-center series. We characterized population-based utilization, costs, and outcomes and assessed whether higher volume affects outcomes. Methods and Materials. Using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2001–2008, we identified 993 RPLND and used propensity score methods to assess utilization, costs, and inpatient outcomes based on hospital surgical volume. Results. 51.6% of RPLND were performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year. RPLND was more commonly performed at large urban teaching hospitals, where men were younger, more likely to be white and earning incomes exceeding the 50th percentile (all P≤.05). Higher hospital volumes were associated with fewer complications and more routine home discharges (all P≤.047). However, higher volume hospitals had more transfusions (P=.004) and incurred $1,435 more in median costs (P<.001). Limitations include inability to adjust for tumor characteristics and absence of outpatient outcomes. Conclusions. Sociodemographic differences exist between high versus low volume RPLND hospitals. Although higher volume hospitals had more transfusions and higher costs, perhaps due to more complex cases, they experienced fewer complications. However, most RPLND are performed at hospitals where there were two or fewer cases per year.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189823
spellingShingle Hua-yin Yu
Nathanael D. Hevelone
Sunil Patel
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Jim C. Hu
Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
Advances in Urology
title Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
title_full Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
title_fullStr Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
title_short Hospital Surgical Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testis Cancer
title_sort hospital surgical volume utilization costs and outcomes of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/189823
work_keys_str_mv AT huayinyu hospitalsurgicalvolumeutilizationcostsandoutcomesofretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortestiscancer
AT nathanaeldhevelone hospitalsurgicalvolumeutilizationcostsandoutcomesofretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortestiscancer
AT sunilpatel hospitalsurgicalvolumeutilizationcostsandoutcomesofretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortestiscancer
AT stuartrlipsitz hospitalsurgicalvolumeutilizationcostsandoutcomesofretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortestiscancer
AT jimchu hospitalsurgicalvolumeutilizationcostsandoutcomesofretroperitoneallymphnodedissectionfortestiscancer