Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
Project material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural dis...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832098494042603520 |
---|---|
author | Atmaja Jajang Natalia Monika Masrilayanti Ramadhani Siraj Rahmadini Yessa Sourkan Sulleyman |
author_facet | Atmaja Jajang Natalia Monika Masrilayanti Ramadhani Siraj Rahmadini Yessa Sourkan Sulleyman |
author_sort | Atmaja Jajang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Project material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural disaster, materials not available, overcost, undercost. This research was carried out substructure of the Inpres Market Development Project located in Painan, Pesisir Selatan. Materials for substructure were imported from Padang, which is 70 km from project located. The topographic conditions of areas that prone to disasters such as floods and landslides, which cause connecting road Padang and Painan to be cut off. Arrival materials delay, which results in project delays and wasted costs, so material management is needed. This study aims to obtain the actual material management costs of the field, further compared to the lot for lot technique. The results, total cost field actual condition of Rp8,909,250,238.42, with a lot for lot technique of Rp8,789,667,046. The cost use lot for lot technique is cheaper by Rp119,583,192.42 or 1.34% due, this technique makes the storage cost zero, meaning that every material that comes will be used directly at the project site. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-36d8a90fb15a4ce9bbf3af60264b8177 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2267-1242 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | E3S Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj-art-36d8a90fb15a4ce9bbf3af60264b81772025-02-05T10:47:53ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422025-01-016040600210.1051/e3sconf/202560406002e3sconf_icdm2024_06002Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual conditionAtmaja Jajang0Natalia Monika1Masrilayanti2Ramadhani Siraj3Rahmadini Yessa4Sourkan Sulleyman5Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangPetroleum and Energy Engineering Department, Sulaimani Polytechnic UniversityProject material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural disaster, materials not available, overcost, undercost. This research was carried out substructure of the Inpres Market Development Project located in Painan, Pesisir Selatan. Materials for substructure were imported from Padang, which is 70 km from project located. The topographic conditions of areas that prone to disasters such as floods and landslides, which cause connecting road Padang and Painan to be cut off. Arrival materials delay, which results in project delays and wasted costs, so material management is needed. This study aims to obtain the actual material management costs of the field, further compared to the lot for lot technique. The results, total cost field actual condition of Rp8,909,250,238.42, with a lot for lot technique of Rp8,789,667,046. The cost use lot for lot technique is cheaper by Rp119,583,192.42 or 1.34% due, this technique makes the storage cost zero, meaning that every material that comes will be used directly at the project site.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf |
spellingShingle | Atmaja Jajang Natalia Monika Masrilayanti Ramadhani Siraj Rahmadini Yessa Sourkan Sulleyman Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition E3S Web of Conferences |
title | Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
title_full | Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
title_fullStr | Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
title_full_unstemmed | Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
title_short | Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
title_sort | material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition |
url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atmajajajang materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition AT nataliamonika materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition AT masrilayanti materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition AT ramadhanisiraj materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition AT rahmadiniyessa materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition AT sourkansulleyman materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition |