Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition

Project material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atmaja Jajang, Natalia Monika, Masrilayanti, Ramadhani Siraj, Rahmadini Yessa, Sourkan Sulleyman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2025-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832098494042603520
author Atmaja Jajang
Natalia Monika
Masrilayanti
Ramadhani Siraj
Rahmadini Yessa
Sourkan Sulleyman
author_facet Atmaja Jajang
Natalia Monika
Masrilayanti
Ramadhani Siraj
Rahmadini Yessa
Sourkan Sulleyman
author_sort Atmaja Jajang
collection DOAJ
description Project material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural disaster, materials not available, overcost, undercost. This research was carried out substructure of the Inpres Market Development Project located in Painan, Pesisir Selatan. Materials for substructure were imported from Padang, which is 70 km from project located. The topographic conditions of areas that prone to disasters such as floods and landslides, which cause connecting road Padang and Painan to be cut off. Arrival materials delay, which results in project delays and wasted costs, so material management is needed. This study aims to obtain the actual material management costs of the field, further compared to the lot for lot technique. The results, total cost field actual condition of Rp8,909,250,238.42, with a lot for lot technique of Rp8,789,667,046. The cost use lot for lot technique is cheaper by Rp119,583,192.42 or 1.34% due, this technique makes the storage cost zero, meaning that every material that comes will be used directly at the project site.
format Article
id doaj-art-36d8a90fb15a4ce9bbf3af60264b8177
institution Kabale University
issn 2267-1242
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj-art-36d8a90fb15a4ce9bbf3af60264b81772025-02-05T10:47:53ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422025-01-016040600210.1051/e3sconf/202560406002e3sconf_icdm2024_06002Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual conditionAtmaja Jajang0Natalia Monika1Masrilayanti2Ramadhani Siraj3Rahmadini Yessa4Sourkan Sulleyman5Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Andalas, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangDepartment of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, PadangPetroleum and Energy Engineering Department, Sulaimani Polytechnic UniversityProject material management aims to regulate effective and efficient use materials because material is a resource the largest percentage of the total project cost. In reality, the process of providing materials encounters many obstacles such as late material arrival cause human error and natural disaster, materials not available, overcost, undercost. This research was carried out substructure of the Inpres Market Development Project located in Painan, Pesisir Selatan. Materials for substructure were imported from Padang, which is 70 km from project located. The topographic conditions of areas that prone to disasters such as floods and landslides, which cause connecting road Padang and Painan to be cut off. Arrival materials delay, which results in project delays and wasted costs, so material management is needed. This study aims to obtain the actual material management costs of the field, further compared to the lot for lot technique. The results, total cost field actual condition of Rp8,909,250,238.42, with a lot for lot technique of Rp8,789,667,046. The cost use lot for lot technique is cheaper by Rp119,583,192.42 or 1.34% due, this technique makes the storage cost zero, meaning that every material that comes will be used directly at the project site.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf
spellingShingle Atmaja Jajang
Natalia Monika
Masrilayanti
Ramadhani Siraj
Rahmadini Yessa
Sourkan Sulleyman
Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
E3S Web of Conferences
title Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
title_full Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
title_fullStr Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
title_full_unstemmed Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
title_short Material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
title_sort material management comparison between lot for lot and field actual condition
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/04/e3sconf_icdm2024_06002.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT atmajajajang materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition
AT nataliamonika materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition
AT masrilayanti materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition
AT ramadhanisiraj materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition
AT rahmadiniyessa materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition
AT sourkansulleyman materialmanagementcomparisonbetweenlotforlotandfieldactualcondition