Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation

Background. A framework on where, when, what, why, and how to use imagery from sports psychology was explored whether it can be applied in patients after stroke in their chronic stage. Methods. Eleven patients (ages 31–85, 3 females, 1.3–6.4 years after stroke) were interviewed. Semistructured inter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Corina Schuster, Andrea Glässel, Anne Scheidhauer, Thierry Ettlin, Jenny Butler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Stroke Research and Treatment
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/503190
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567784359329792
author Corina Schuster
Andrea Glässel
Anne Scheidhauer
Thierry Ettlin
Jenny Butler
author_facet Corina Schuster
Andrea Glässel
Anne Scheidhauer
Thierry Ettlin
Jenny Butler
author_sort Corina Schuster
collection DOAJ
description Background. A framework on where, when, what, why, and how to use imagery from sports psychology was explored whether it can be applied in patients after stroke in their chronic stage. Methods. Eleven patients (ages 31–85, 3 females, 1.3–6.4 years after stroke) were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted before and after a two-week MI intervention period with six MI sessions. Information was obtained regarding experiences and knowledge of MI, and the evaluation of an MI practical example. The coding scheme was based on the framework and a hierarchical categorisation. Results. Information regarding domains where, when, what, why, and how to use imagery was addressed. Patients imagined themselves as healthy individuals, did not focus on surroundings during MI practice,and reported to use positive imagery only. After MI training, patients became more flexible regarding their location and position during MI practice. Conclusions. MI became an automatic process, and patients did not need specific concentration and quietness as mentioned in the first interview. Patients recommended daily MI training and began to transfer MI to practice movements that were affected by the stroke. In contrast to sports, patients did not talk about how MI was triggered rather than how MI was designed.
format Article
id doaj-art-3589a51d4f4a482faa16b22f51b5348a
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8105
2042-0056
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Stroke Research and Treatment
spelling doaj-art-3589a51d4f4a482faa16b22f51b5348a2025-02-03T01:00:28ZengWileyStroke Research and Treatment2090-81052042-00562012-01-01201210.1155/2012/503190503190Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative InvestigationCorina Schuster0Andrea Glässel1Anne Scheidhauer2Thierry Ettlin3Jenny Butler4Research Department Reha Rheinfelden, Salinenstrasse 98, 4310 Rheinfelden, Switzerland Institute of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80539 Munich, GermanyResearch Department Reha Rheinfelden, Salinenstrasse 98, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandResearch Department Reha Rheinfelden, Salinenstrasse 98, 4310 Rheinfelden, SwitzerlandDepartment of Sport and Health Sceinces, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UKBackground. A framework on where, when, what, why, and how to use imagery from sports psychology was explored whether it can be applied in patients after stroke in their chronic stage. Methods. Eleven patients (ages 31–85, 3 females, 1.3–6.4 years after stroke) were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted before and after a two-week MI intervention period with six MI sessions. Information was obtained regarding experiences and knowledge of MI, and the evaluation of an MI practical example. The coding scheme was based on the framework and a hierarchical categorisation. Results. Information regarding domains where, when, what, why, and how to use imagery was addressed. Patients imagined themselves as healthy individuals, did not focus on surroundings during MI practice,and reported to use positive imagery only. After MI training, patients became more flexible regarding their location and position during MI practice. Conclusions. MI became an automatic process, and patients did not need specific concentration and quietness as mentioned in the first interview. Patients recommended daily MI training and began to transfer MI to practice movements that were affected by the stroke. In contrast to sports, patients did not talk about how MI was triggered rather than how MI was designed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/503190
spellingShingle Corina Schuster
Andrea Glässel
Anne Scheidhauer
Thierry Ettlin
Jenny Butler
Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
Stroke Research and Treatment
title Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
title_full Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
title_fullStr Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
title_short Motor Imagery Experiences and Use: Asking Patients after Stroke Where, When, What, Why, and How They Use Imagery: A Qualitative Investigation
title_sort motor imagery experiences and use asking patients after stroke where when what why and how they use imagery a qualitative investigation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/503190
work_keys_str_mv AT corinaschuster motorimageryexperiencesanduseaskingpatientsafterstrokewherewhenwhatwhyandhowtheyuseimageryaqualitativeinvestigation
AT andreaglassel motorimageryexperiencesanduseaskingpatientsafterstrokewherewhenwhatwhyandhowtheyuseimageryaqualitativeinvestigation
AT annescheidhauer motorimageryexperiencesanduseaskingpatientsafterstrokewherewhenwhatwhyandhowtheyuseimageryaqualitativeinvestigation
AT thierryettlin motorimageryexperiencesanduseaskingpatientsafterstrokewherewhenwhatwhyandhowtheyuseimageryaqualitativeinvestigation
AT jennybutler motorimageryexperiencesanduseaskingpatientsafterstrokewherewhenwhatwhyandhowtheyuseimageryaqualitativeinvestigation