Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study

Objectives. The aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes of zirconia implants positioned in the esthetic jaw areas. Materials and Method. 13 patients were selected and 20 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Enrico Borgonovo, Rachele Censi, Virna Vavassori, Oscar Arnaboldi, Carlo Maiorana, Dino Re
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/415029
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552147254771712
author Andrea Enrico Borgonovo
Rachele Censi
Virna Vavassori
Oscar Arnaboldi
Carlo Maiorana
Dino Re
author_facet Andrea Enrico Borgonovo
Rachele Censi
Virna Vavassori
Oscar Arnaboldi
Carlo Maiorana
Dino Re
author_sort Andrea Enrico Borgonovo
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. The aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes of zirconia implants positioned in the esthetic jaw areas. Materials and Method. 13 patients were selected and 20 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilitation of single tooth or partially edentulous ridge in the esthetic jaw areas. Six months after surgery and then once a year, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed in order to estimate peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone loss. Results. The survival and success rates were 100%. The average marginal bone loss from baseline to 48 months after surgery was +2.1 mm. Four years after surgery, the median and the mode for visible Plaque Index and Bleeding On Probing resulted 1 whereas Probing Pocket Depth amounted to 3 mm (SD = ±0.49 mm). Conclusion. One-piece zirconia dental implants are characterized by high biocompatibility, low plaque adhesion, and absence of microgap that can be related to the clinical success of these implants even in the esthetic areas.
format Article
id doaj-art-338d73380e6c4e3988e7f4d87b9b1543
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-338d73380e6c4e3988e7f4d87b9b15432025-02-03T05:59:28ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362015-01-01201510.1155/2015/415029415029Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation StudyAndrea Enrico Borgonovo0Rachele Censi1Virna Vavassori2Oscar Arnaboldi3Carlo Maiorana4Dino Re5School of Oral Surgery, University of Milan, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Implantology and Periodontology, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, ItalySchool of Oral Surgery, University of Milan, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Implantology, Dental Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, School of Oral surgery, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Implantology, Dental Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, School of Oral surgery, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, ItalyHead Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, ItalyObjectives. The aim is to evaluate the survival and success rates, as well as the marginal bone loss (MBL) and periodontal indexes of zirconia implants positioned in the esthetic jaw areas. Materials and Method. 13 patients were selected and 20 one-piece zirconia implants were used for the rehabilitation of single tooth or partially edentulous ridge in the esthetic jaw areas. Six months after surgery and then once a year, a clinical-radiographic evaluation was performed in order to estimate peri-implant tissue health and marginal bone loss. Results. The survival and success rates were 100%. The average marginal bone loss from baseline to 48 months after surgery was +2.1 mm. Four years after surgery, the median and the mode for visible Plaque Index and Bleeding On Probing resulted 1 whereas Probing Pocket Depth amounted to 3 mm (SD = ±0.49 mm). Conclusion. One-piece zirconia dental implants are characterized by high biocompatibility, low plaque adhesion, and absence of microgap that can be related to the clinical success of these implants even in the esthetic areas.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/415029
spellingShingle Andrea Enrico Borgonovo
Rachele Censi
Virna Vavassori
Oscar Arnaboldi
Carlo Maiorana
Dino Re
Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
International Journal of Dentistry
title Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
title_full Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
title_fullStr Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
title_full_unstemmed Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
title_short Zirconia Implants in Esthetic Areas: 4-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Study
title_sort zirconia implants in esthetic areas 4 year follow up evaluation study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/415029
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaenricoborgonovo zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy
AT rachelecensi zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy
AT virnavavassori zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy
AT oscararnaboldi zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy
AT carlomaiorana zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy
AT dinore zirconiaimplantsinestheticareas4yearfollowupevaluationstudy