Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection

Introduction. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is very common worldwide. A reliable diagnosis is crucial for patients with H. pylori-related diseases. At followup, it is important to confirm that eradication therapy has been successful. There is no established gold standard for the diagnosi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Redéen, F. Petersson, E. Törnkrantz, H. Levander, E. Mårdh, K. Borch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/940650
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558510371504128
author S. Redéen
F. Petersson
E. Törnkrantz
H. Levander
E. Mårdh
K. Borch
author_facet S. Redéen
F. Petersson
E. Törnkrantz
H. Levander
E. Mårdh
K. Borch
author_sort S. Redéen
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is very common worldwide. A reliable diagnosis is crucial for patients with H. pylori-related diseases. At followup, it is important to confirm that eradication therapy has been successful. There is no established gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Material and Methods. A sample of 304 volunteers from the general population was screened for H. pylori infection with serology, 13C-urea breath test (UBT), rapid urease test (RUT) on fresh biopsy, culture from biopsy, and histological examination. Culture was used as gold standard. Results. The sensitivity was 0.99 for serology, 0.90 for UBT, 0.90 for RUT, and 0.90 for histological examination. Corresponding specificities were 0.82, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. The accuracy was 0.86 for serology, 0.96 for UBT, 0.95 for RUT, 0.93 for culture, and 0.95 for histology. There was a strong correlation between the results of UBT and the histological scores of H. pylori colonisation as well as between the results of UBT and the scores of RUT. Conclusion. There were only minor differences in accuracy between the three invasive tests for H. pylori infection in this population. RUT may be recommended as the first choice since a result is obtained within hours. The accuracy of UBT was comparable to the invasive tests, and it is recommended for situations when endoscopy is not needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-30b5dbd10a254c28a36b3ac5c24a65b1
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6121
1687-630X
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Gastroenterology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-30b5dbd10a254c28a36b3ac5c24a65b12025-02-03T01:32:14ZengWileyGastroenterology Research and Practice1687-61211687-630X2011-01-01201110.1155/2011/940650940650Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori InfectionS. Redéen0F. Petersson1E. Törnkrantz2H. Levander3E. Mårdh4K. Borch5Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, SwedenDepartment of Pathology, National University Health System, 119074, SingaporeDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, SwedenDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, SwedenDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, SwedenDivision of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, 581 85 Linköping, SwedenIntroduction. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is very common worldwide. A reliable diagnosis is crucial for patients with H. pylori-related diseases. At followup, it is important to confirm that eradication therapy has been successful. There is no established gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Material and Methods. A sample of 304 volunteers from the general population was screened for H. pylori infection with serology, 13C-urea breath test (UBT), rapid urease test (RUT) on fresh biopsy, culture from biopsy, and histological examination. Culture was used as gold standard. Results. The sensitivity was 0.99 for serology, 0.90 for UBT, 0.90 for RUT, and 0.90 for histological examination. Corresponding specificities were 0.82, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. The accuracy was 0.86 for serology, 0.96 for UBT, 0.95 for RUT, 0.93 for culture, and 0.95 for histology. There was a strong correlation between the results of UBT and the histological scores of H. pylori colonisation as well as between the results of UBT and the scores of RUT. Conclusion. There were only minor differences in accuracy between the three invasive tests for H. pylori infection in this population. RUT may be recommended as the first choice since a result is obtained within hours. The accuracy of UBT was comparable to the invasive tests, and it is recommended for situations when endoscopy is not needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/940650
spellingShingle S. Redéen
F. Petersson
E. Törnkrantz
H. Levander
E. Mårdh
K. Borch
Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
title Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
title_full Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
title_fullStr Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
title_short Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection
title_sort reliability of diagnostic tests for helicobacter pylori infection
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/940650
work_keys_str_mv AT sredeen reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection
AT fpetersson reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection
AT etornkrantz reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection
AT hlevander reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection
AT emardh reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection
AT kborch reliabilityofdiagnostictestsforhelicobacterpyloriinfection