Comparative analysis of control methods with predictive models of six-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor

This article presents a comparison of the performance of the sixphase permanent magnet motor (PMSM) based on two control methods: continuous control set model predictive control (CCSMPC) and a finite control set model predictive control (FCSMPC). The basic concepts and principles of control systems...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. A. R. Rahim, S. N. Kladiev, S. Saeidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonoumos Educational Institution of Higher Education 2020-06-01
Series:Омский научный вестник
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/3%20(171)/51-56%20%D0%A0%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B8%D0%BC%20%D0%90.%20%D0%90.%20%D0%A0.,%20%D0%9A%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%20%D0%A1.%20%D0%9D.,%20%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B8%20%D0%A1..pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article presents a comparison of the performance of the sixphase permanent magnet motor (PMSM) based on two control methods: continuous control set model predictive control (CCSMPC) and a finite control set model predictive control (FCSMPC). The basic concepts and principles of control systems for synchronous motors with permanent magnets are examined, their behaviors are studied to compare the effectiveness of these methods. The CCS-MPC method is studied on a simulation model of dual three-phase PMSM for the first time, unlike the previously used FCS-MPC control method. The simulation results are presented in the form of graphical dependencies. Analysis of the results shows that when using the CCS-MPC method, the state variables accuracy controlling of the drive is higher, dynamic errors are less, although the speed of the FCS-MPC method is higher.
ISSN:1813-8225
2541-7541