Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study

Purpose. To compare one-year treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Methods. The medical records of a total of 30 eyes diagnosed with mCNV and underwent IVA or IVR treatment for a minimum on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Burak Erden, Selim Bölükbaşı, Emine Baş, Akın Çakır
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8639243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554272504414208
author Burak Erden
Selim Bölükbaşı
Emine Baş
Akın Çakır
author_facet Burak Erden
Selim Bölükbaşı
Emine Baş
Akın Çakır
author_sort Burak Erden
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare one-year treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Methods. The medical records of a total of 30 eyes diagnosed with mCNV and underwent IVA or IVR treatment for a minimum one-year follow-up were studied retrospectively. All the subjects had an axial length >26 mm and received a 1 + PRN (pro re nata) regimen IVA or IVR. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thicknesses (CMT) on optical coherence tomography were evaluated before and after treatment. Results. There were 12 eyes in IVA group, with a mean age of 60.0 ± 10.2 years. The mean BCVA significantly improved from baseline 1.54 ± 0.76 to 0.85 ± 0.61 and the mean CMT significantly decreased from baseline 384.3 ± 119.1 μm to 305.9 ± 75.4 μm at Month 12 (p:0.024 and p:0.011, respectively). There were 18 eyes in IVR group, with a mean age of 57.4 ± 13.1 years. The mean BCVA improved from baseline 1.14 ± 0.90 to 1.04 ± 0.93 and the mean CMT significantly decreased from baseline 366.5 ± 102.3 μm to 323.6 ± 103.6 μm at Month 12 after IVR (p:0.345 and p:0.011, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in CMT changes in the study period (p:0.178), but IVA resulted in significantly better final visual gain (0.69 versus 0.09; p:0.006). Conclusions. Both IVA and IVR treatment modalities resulted in similar anatomical outcomes but IVA had better visual outcomes in treatment of mCNV.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a8373b11e8b427b9b9fd7235dcc4b38
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-2a8373b11e8b427b9b9fd7235dcc4b382025-02-03T05:51:50ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582019-01-01201910.1155/2019/86392438639243Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative StudyBurak Erden0Selim Bölükbaşı1Emine Baş2Akın Çakır3University of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Education and Research Hospital, Retina Department, Istanbul, TurkeyUniversity of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Education and Research Hospital, Retina Department, Istanbul, TurkeyUniversity of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Education and Research Hospital, Retina Department, Istanbul, TurkeyUniversity of Health Sciences, Okmeydanı Education and Research Hospital, Retina Department, Istanbul, TurkeyPurpose. To compare one-year treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV). Methods. The medical records of a total of 30 eyes diagnosed with mCNV and underwent IVA or IVR treatment for a minimum one-year follow-up were studied retrospectively. All the subjects had an axial length >26 mm and received a 1 + PRN (pro re nata) regimen IVA or IVR. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thicknesses (CMT) on optical coherence tomography were evaluated before and after treatment. Results. There were 12 eyes in IVA group, with a mean age of 60.0 ± 10.2 years. The mean BCVA significantly improved from baseline 1.54 ± 0.76 to 0.85 ± 0.61 and the mean CMT significantly decreased from baseline 384.3 ± 119.1 μm to 305.9 ± 75.4 μm at Month 12 (p:0.024 and p:0.011, respectively). There were 18 eyes in IVR group, with a mean age of 57.4 ± 13.1 years. The mean BCVA improved from baseline 1.14 ± 0.90 to 1.04 ± 0.93 and the mean CMT significantly decreased from baseline 366.5 ± 102.3 μm to 323.6 ± 103.6 μm at Month 12 after IVR (p:0.345 and p:0.011, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in CMT changes in the study period (p:0.178), but IVA resulted in significantly better final visual gain (0.69 versus 0.09; p:0.006). Conclusions. Both IVA and IVR treatment modalities resulted in similar anatomical outcomes but IVA had better visual outcomes in treatment of mCNV.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8639243
spellingShingle Burak Erden
Selim Bölükbaşı
Emine Baş
Akın Çakır
Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
title_full Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
title_short Comparison of Intravitreal Aflibercept and Ranibizumab for Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: One-Year Results—A Retrospective, Comparative Study
title_sort comparison of intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab for treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization one year results a retrospective comparative study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8639243
work_keys_str_mv AT burakerden comparisonofintravitrealafliberceptandranibizumabfortreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationoneyearresultsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT selimbolukbası comparisonofintravitrealafliberceptandranibizumabfortreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationoneyearresultsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT eminebas comparisonofintravitrealafliberceptandranibizumabfortreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationoneyearresultsaretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT akıncakır comparisonofintravitrealafliberceptandranibizumabfortreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationoneyearresultsaretrospectivecomparativestudy