Écrire avec Flaubert

I am interested in the way in which many writers of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Kafka to Claude Simon, Roland Barthes, Pierre Michon, or Jean-Philippe Toussaint, have demonstrated in their writings, their correspondence, or their interviews, an interest in Flaubert’s manner of writing, based o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne Herschberg Pierrot
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) 2024-06-01
Series:Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5582
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095818470916096
author Anne Herschberg Pierrot
author_facet Anne Herschberg Pierrot
author_sort Anne Herschberg Pierrot
collection DOAJ
description I am interested in the way in which many writers of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Kafka to Claude Simon, Roland Barthes, Pierre Michon, or Jean-Philippe Toussaint, have demonstrated in their writings, their correspondence, or their interviews, an interest in Flaubert’s manner of writing, based on their reading of Flaubert’s correspondence, or on direct or indirect knowledge of Flaubert’s manuscripts. In the context of the myth that Flaubert represents for contemporary writing, the aim is to examine not so much the reception of the published work, but rather the imaginary relationship that these writers have with Flaubertian genesis, or Flaubertian discourse on the genesis of the work. Whether they express their affiliation or their refusal, they write with Flaubert. The article will compare three moments in time: the 1910s, around Kafka and Proust, the 1970s, around La Préparation du roman by Roland Barthes, the 2000s with Marie-Hélène Lafon.
format Article
id doaj-art-2a2988a408e8467ab9262abf3097408a
institution Kabale University
issn 1969-6191
language fra
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
record_format Article
series Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
spelling doaj-art-2a2988a408e8467ab9262abf3097408a2025-02-05T16:29:14ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912024-06-013110.4000/12fd6Écrire avec FlaubertAnne Herschberg PierrotI am interested in the way in which many writers of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Kafka to Claude Simon, Roland Barthes, Pierre Michon, or Jean-Philippe Toussaint, have demonstrated in their writings, their correspondence, or their interviews, an interest in Flaubert’s manner of writing, based on their reading of Flaubert’s correspondence, or on direct or indirect knowledge of Flaubert’s manuscripts. In the context of the myth that Flaubert represents for contemporary writing, the aim is to examine not so much the reception of the published work, but rather the imaginary relationship that these writers have with Flaubertian genesis, or Flaubertian discourse on the genesis of the work. Whether they express their affiliation or their refusal, they write with Flaubert. The article will compare three moments in time: the 1910s, around Kafka and Proust, the 1970s, around La Préparation du roman by Roland Barthes, the 2000s with Marie-Hélène Lafon.https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5582genetic criticismProust MarcelKafka FranzBarthes RolandLafon Marie-Hélène
spellingShingle Anne Herschberg Pierrot
Écrire avec Flaubert
Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique
genetic criticism
Proust Marcel
Kafka Franz
Barthes Roland
Lafon Marie-Hélène
title Écrire avec Flaubert
title_full Écrire avec Flaubert
title_fullStr Écrire avec Flaubert
title_full_unstemmed Écrire avec Flaubert
title_short Écrire avec Flaubert
title_sort ecrire avec flaubert
topic genetic criticism
Proust Marcel
Kafka Franz
Barthes Roland
Lafon Marie-Hélène
url https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5582
work_keys_str_mv AT anneherschbergpierrot ecrireavecflaubert