Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ?
The notions of territory and landscape have many meanings and usages. In this article, stress is laid on the social dimension of the landscape as conveying a representation of the world and of itself in the world. Unlike territory allotted for a use, the landscape is supposed to produce an image tha...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
2011-07-01
|
| Series: | Projets de Paysage |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17733 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832095980707643392 |
|---|---|
| author | Olga Pashchenko |
| author_facet | Olga Pashchenko |
| author_sort | Olga Pashchenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The notions of territory and landscape have many meanings and usages. In this article, stress is laid on the social dimension of the landscape as conveying a representation of the world and of itself in the world. Unlike territory allotted for a use, the landscape is supposed to produce an image that reflects a vision of the territory. This approach puts those who produce the landscape at its centre. The objective of the comparison between the community gardens of Paris, Marseille and Lille is two-fold: to understand whether these territories can be defined as landscapes; to show the intentions of those who created these spaces, as well as those of their users. This analysis opens up political questions about the concept of urban landscape on one hand, and about the vision of nature in the city on the other. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-27c93c798e534252a602a5cd876448d8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1969-6124 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2011-07-01 |
| publisher | Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Projets de Paysage |
| spelling | doaj-art-27c93c798e534252a602a5cd876448d82025-02-05T16:21:02ZfraAgrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP LilleProjets de Paysage1969-61242011-07-01610.4000/paysage.17733Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ?Olga PashchenkoThe notions of territory and landscape have many meanings and usages. In this article, stress is laid on the social dimension of the landscape as conveying a representation of the world and of itself in the world. Unlike territory allotted for a use, the landscape is supposed to produce an image that reflects a vision of the territory. This approach puts those who produce the landscape at its centre. The objective of the comparison between the community gardens of Paris, Marseille and Lille is two-fold: to understand whether these territories can be defined as landscapes; to show the intentions of those who created these spaces, as well as those of their users. This analysis opens up political questions about the concept of urban landscape on one hand, and about the vision of nature in the city on the other.https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17733landscapeconflictterritoryperception of what is communalpublic policies on landscape |
| spellingShingle | Olga Pashchenko Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? Projets de Paysage landscape conflict territory perception of what is communal public policies on landscape |
| title | Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? |
| title_full | Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? |
| title_fullStr | Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? |
| title_short | Le jardin partagé est-il un paysage ? |
| title_sort | le jardin partage est il un paysage |
| topic | landscape conflict territory perception of what is communal public policies on landscape |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17733 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT olgapashchenko lejardinpartageestilunpaysage |