Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia

Purpose. To compare the visual performance and astigmatism tolerance of 3 intraocular lens (IOL) groups: monofocal, bifocal, and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs targeting slight myopia. Methods. Overall, there were 60 cataract surgery eyes from 60 patients with implantation of a monofocal, bifoc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Xu, Tianyu Zheng, Yi Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9283021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567850156425216
author Jie Xu
Tianyu Zheng
Yi Lu
author_facet Jie Xu
Tianyu Zheng
Yi Lu
author_sort Jie Xu
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the visual performance and astigmatism tolerance of 3 intraocular lens (IOL) groups: monofocal, bifocal, and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs targeting slight myopia. Methods. Overall, there were 60 cataract surgery eyes from 60 patients with implantation of a monofocal, bifocal, or EDOF IOL (20 eyes in each IOL group). The EDOF IOLs targeted slight myopia (−0.25 D to −0.75 D). Intragroup comparison of visual acuity, defocus curve, objective optical quality, contrast sensitivity, visual function questionnaire scores, patients’ overall satisfaction, and the astigmatism tolerance was performed 3 months after surgery. Results. The EDOF group provided equivalently excellent distance visual outcomes (0.06 ± 0.12) as the monofocal (0.06 ± 0.09) and bifocal (0.03 ± 0.09) groups P=0.554, better intermediate vision than the other 2 groups P<0.05, and similarly satisfactory near visual outcomes (0.23 ± 0.16 at 20 cm, and 0.17 ± 0.14 at 33 cm) as the bifocal group (0.28 ± 0.14 at 20 cm and 0.08 ± 0.10 at 33 cm) P>0.05. The contrast sensitivity of EDOF IOL was slightly decreased compared to that of monofocal IOL, but it was better than that of bifocal IOL. The EDOF group showed significantly higher satisfaction than the bifocal group did when preoperative corneal astigmatism was 0.75 D or greater P=0.009. A significant negative correlation between the corneal astigmatism and patient satisfaction was observed in only the bifocal group. Conclusions. The EDOF IOLs targeting slight myopia offered satisfactory visual outcomes at an extended range from far to near distances. The EDOF and monofocal IOLs showed a better tolerance to astigmatism than did the bifocal IOL.
format Article
id doaj-art-26f830acc5b04dcc973f656b63679ffa
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-26f830acc5b04dcc973f656b63679ffa2025-02-03T01:00:18ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/92830219283021Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight MyopiaJie Xu0Tianyu Zheng1Yi Lu2Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Rd., Shanghai 200031, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Rd., Shanghai 200031, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, 83 Fenyang Rd., Shanghai 200031, ChinaPurpose. To compare the visual performance and astigmatism tolerance of 3 intraocular lens (IOL) groups: monofocal, bifocal, and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs targeting slight myopia. Methods. Overall, there were 60 cataract surgery eyes from 60 patients with implantation of a monofocal, bifocal, or EDOF IOL (20 eyes in each IOL group). The EDOF IOLs targeted slight myopia (−0.25 D to −0.75 D). Intragroup comparison of visual acuity, defocus curve, objective optical quality, contrast sensitivity, visual function questionnaire scores, patients’ overall satisfaction, and the astigmatism tolerance was performed 3 months after surgery. Results. The EDOF group provided equivalently excellent distance visual outcomes (0.06 ± 0.12) as the monofocal (0.06 ± 0.09) and bifocal (0.03 ± 0.09) groups P=0.554, better intermediate vision than the other 2 groups P<0.05, and similarly satisfactory near visual outcomes (0.23 ± 0.16 at 20 cm, and 0.17 ± 0.14 at 33 cm) as the bifocal group (0.28 ± 0.14 at 20 cm and 0.08 ± 0.10 at 33 cm) P>0.05. The contrast sensitivity of EDOF IOL was slightly decreased compared to that of monofocal IOL, but it was better than that of bifocal IOL. The EDOF group showed significantly higher satisfaction than the bifocal group did when preoperative corneal astigmatism was 0.75 D or greater P=0.009. A significant negative correlation between the corneal astigmatism and patient satisfaction was observed in only the bifocal group. Conclusions. The EDOF IOLs targeting slight myopia offered satisfactory visual outcomes at an extended range from far to near distances. The EDOF and monofocal IOLs showed a better tolerance to astigmatism than did the bifocal IOL.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9283021
spellingShingle Jie Xu
Tianyu Zheng
Yi Lu
Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
title_full Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
title_short Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Astigmatism Tolerance with Monofocal, Bifocal, and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses Targeting Slight Myopia
title_sort comparative analysis of visual performance and astigmatism tolerance with monofocal bifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses targeting slight myopia
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9283021
work_keys_str_mv AT jiexu comparativeanalysisofvisualperformanceandastigmatismtolerancewithmonofocalbifocalandextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensestargetingslightmyopia
AT tianyuzheng comparativeanalysisofvisualperformanceandastigmatismtolerancewithmonofocalbifocalandextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensestargetingslightmyopia
AT yilu comparativeanalysisofvisualperformanceandastigmatismtolerancewithmonofocalbifocalandextendeddepthoffocusintraocularlensestargetingslightmyopia