Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study

Background and Aims: Precise airway management is vital in thoracic surgeries to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Choosing the correct double-lumen tube (DLT) size is challenging, as it typically relies on height, gender and subjective experience. This study investigates using ultrasonogr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roshni M. Mathew, Shefali Gautam, Rajesh Raman, Anurag Rai, Vinod K. Srivastava, Manish K. Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-10-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_641_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587198886576128
author Roshni M. Mathew
Shefali Gautam
Rajesh Raman
Anurag Rai
Vinod K. Srivastava
Manish K. Singh
author_facet Roshni M. Mathew
Shefali Gautam
Rajesh Raman
Anurag Rai
Vinod K. Srivastava
Manish K. Singh
author_sort Roshni M. Mathew
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Precise airway management is vital in thoracic surgeries to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Choosing the correct double-lumen tube (DLT) size is challenging, as it typically relies on height, gender and subjective experience. This study investigates using ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) to measure cricoid cartilage diameter for objective DLT sizing. Methods: In a randomised study, 120 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were randomised to three groups: Group A (DLT size determined by USG), Group B (DLT size determined by CT) and Group C (DLT size determined by conventional methods based on height and gender). The primary outcome variable was the appropriateness of DLT size. Secondary outcome variables were the degree of lung collapse and sore throat. Student’s t-test and ꭓ2 test were used to analyse continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: DLT sizing based on cricoid cartilage diameter improved the accuracy, with inappropriate sizes found in 25% in the conventional group, 5% in the USG group and 2.5% in the CT group (P < 0.05). Lung collapse was better in the USG (excellent in 92.5%) and CT (95%) groups compared to the conventional group (70%) (P < 0.05). Moderate sore throat was higher in the conventional group (37.5%) compared to the USG (5%) and CT groups (7.5%). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that USG- and CT-guided measurements of cricoid cartilage diameter are reliable and effective methods for determining DLT size in thoracic surgery compared to conventional methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-23e76fd4f7d04bcbbf83dcf2172e80ff
institution Kabale University
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj-art-23e76fd4f7d04bcbbf83dcf2172e80ff2025-01-24T15:06:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172024-10-01681089690110.4103/ija.ija_641_24Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative studyRoshni M. MathewShefali GautamRajesh RamanAnurag RaiVinod K. SrivastavaManish K. SinghBackground and Aims: Precise airway management is vital in thoracic surgeries to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. Choosing the correct double-lumen tube (DLT) size is challenging, as it typically relies on height, gender and subjective experience. This study investigates using ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) to measure cricoid cartilage diameter for objective DLT sizing. Methods: In a randomised study, 120 adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were randomised to three groups: Group A (DLT size determined by USG), Group B (DLT size determined by CT) and Group C (DLT size determined by conventional methods based on height and gender). The primary outcome variable was the appropriateness of DLT size. Secondary outcome variables were the degree of lung collapse and sore throat. Student’s t-test and ꭓ2 test were used to analyse continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Results: DLT sizing based on cricoid cartilage diameter improved the accuracy, with inappropriate sizes found in 25% in the conventional group, 5% in the USG group and 2.5% in the CT group (P < 0.05). Lung collapse was better in the USG (excellent in 92.5%) and CT (95%) groups compared to the conventional group (70%) (P < 0.05). Moderate sore throat was higher in the conventional group (37.5%) compared to the USG (5%) and CT groups (7.5%). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that USG- and CT-guided measurements of cricoid cartilage diameter are reliable and effective methods for determining DLT size in thoracic surgery compared to conventional methods.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_641_24airway managementcomputed tomographycricoid cartilagedouble-lumen tubethoracic surgeryultrasonography
spellingShingle Roshni M. Mathew
Shefali Gautam
Rajesh Raman
Anurag Rai
Vinod K. Srivastava
Manish K. Singh
Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
airway management
computed tomography
cricoid cartilage
double-lumen tube
thoracic surgery
ultrasonography
title Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
title_full Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
title_fullStr Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
title_short Evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography-guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double-lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery: A randomised comparative study
title_sort evaluating the precision of ultrasound versus computed tomography guided measurement of cricoid cartilage diameter for double lumen tube selection in thoracic surgery a randomised comparative study
topic airway management
computed tomography
cricoid cartilage
double-lumen tube
thoracic surgery
ultrasonography
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ija.ija_641_24
work_keys_str_mv AT roshnimmathew evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT shefaligautam evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT rajeshraman evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT anuragrai evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT vinodksrivastava evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy
AT manishksingh evaluatingtheprecisionofultrasoundversuscomputedtomographyguidedmeasurementofcricoidcartilagediameterfordoublelumentubeselectioninthoracicsurgeryarandomisedcomparativestudy