Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment

Abstract Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is characterized by recurrent sprains and persistent symptoms, which impair postural control. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of various linear and nonlinear postural stability measures in distinguishing individuals with CAI from health...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Makan Piri, Kazem Malmir, Khadijeh Otadi, Azadeh Shadmehr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01064-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571426058534912
author Makan Piri
Kazem Malmir
Khadijeh Otadi
Azadeh Shadmehr
author_facet Makan Piri
Kazem Malmir
Khadijeh Otadi
Azadeh Shadmehr
author_sort Makan Piri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is characterized by recurrent sprains and persistent symptoms, which impair postural control. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of various linear and nonlinear postural stability measures in distinguishing individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Methods Postural stability was assessed in 24 participants (12 with CAI and 12 healthy controls) using a force platform under four conditions: hard surface with eyes open, hard surface with eyes closed, soft surface with eyes open, and soft surface with eyes closed. Linear measures of center of pressure (COP) included range in the anteroposterior (Rfa) and mediolateral (Rsw) directions, mean velocity (MV), and sway area. Nonlinear measures included approximate entropy (ApEn), the largest Lyapunov exponent, and correlation dimension (CD) with its standard deviation. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine cutoff scores, allowing effective differentiation between CAI and healthy participants. Result AI individuals exhibited increased mediolateral COP sway and higher mean velocity on hard surfaces with both eyes open and closed. On soft surfaces with eyes closed, they showed significant deficits in sway area and mean velocity, reflecting challenges in postural control. ROC analysis revealed that certain linear and nonlinear measures showed strong diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Nonlinear analysis revealed elevated ApEn and reduced CD in CAI participants, indicating greater postural irregularity and reduced dynamic stability. On a hard surface with eyes open both Rsw (cutoff: 1.18 cm, OR: 4.55) and ApEn (cutoff: 0.07, OR: 4.0) were particularly strong diagnostic indicators. Conclusion Linear and nonlinear postural stability measures effectively differentiate individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Key metrics, including Rsw, MV, ApEn, and CD, offer strong diagnostic value for early detection and personalized rehabilitation. Incorporating these measures into clinical practice may improve CAI management and patient outcomes. Ethical code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.236. March 14, 2022.
format Article
id doaj-art-1b35ce0be05e4c05a51733d9a9544b62
institution Kabale University
issn 2052-1847
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-1b35ce0be05e4c05a51733d9a9544b622025-02-02T12:36:20ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472025-01-0117111310.1186/s13102-025-01064-yPostural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessmentMakan Piri0Kazem Malmir1Khadijeh Otadi2Azadeh Shadmehr3Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical ScienceDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical ScienceAbstract Background Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is characterized by recurrent sprains and persistent symptoms, which impair postural control. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of various linear and nonlinear postural stability measures in distinguishing individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Methods Postural stability was assessed in 24 participants (12 with CAI and 12 healthy controls) using a force platform under four conditions: hard surface with eyes open, hard surface with eyes closed, soft surface with eyes open, and soft surface with eyes closed. Linear measures of center of pressure (COP) included range in the anteroposterior (Rfa) and mediolateral (Rsw) directions, mean velocity (MV), and sway area. Nonlinear measures included approximate entropy (ApEn), the largest Lyapunov exponent, and correlation dimension (CD) with its standard deviation. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine cutoff scores, allowing effective differentiation between CAI and healthy participants. Result AI individuals exhibited increased mediolateral COP sway and higher mean velocity on hard surfaces with both eyes open and closed. On soft surfaces with eyes closed, they showed significant deficits in sway area and mean velocity, reflecting challenges in postural control. ROC analysis revealed that certain linear and nonlinear measures showed strong diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Nonlinear analysis revealed elevated ApEn and reduced CD in CAI participants, indicating greater postural irregularity and reduced dynamic stability. On a hard surface with eyes open both Rsw (cutoff: 1.18 cm, OR: 4.55) and ApEn (cutoff: 0.07, OR: 4.0) were particularly strong diagnostic indicators. Conclusion Linear and nonlinear postural stability measures effectively differentiate individuals with CAI from healthy controls. Key metrics, including Rsw, MV, ApEn, and CD, offer strong diagnostic value for early detection and personalized rehabilitation. Incorporating these measures into clinical practice may improve CAI management and patient outcomes. Ethical code IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1400.236. March 14, 2022.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01064-yChronic ankle instabilityPostural ControlROC analysisCenter of pressure
spellingShingle Makan Piri
Kazem Malmir
Khadijeh Otadi
Azadeh Shadmehr
Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Chronic ankle instability
Postural Control
ROC analysis
Center of pressure
title Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
title_full Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
title_fullStr Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
title_full_unstemmed Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
title_short Postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability: a comprehensive assessment
title_sort postural stability measures as diagnostic tools for chronic ankle instability a comprehensive assessment
topic Chronic ankle instability
Postural Control
ROC analysis
Center of pressure
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01064-y
work_keys_str_mv AT makanpiri posturalstabilitymeasuresasdiagnostictoolsforchronicankleinstabilityacomprehensiveassessment
AT kazemmalmir posturalstabilitymeasuresasdiagnostictoolsforchronicankleinstabilityacomprehensiveassessment
AT khadijehotadi posturalstabilitymeasuresasdiagnostictoolsforchronicankleinstabilityacomprehensiveassessment
AT azadehshadmehr posturalstabilitymeasuresasdiagnostictoolsforchronicankleinstabilityacomprehensiveassessment