Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
The consolidation of scientific knowledge proceeds through the interpretation and then distillation of data presented in research reports, first in review articles and then in textbooks and undergraduate courses, until truths become accepted as such both amongst "experts" and in the public...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Emily S Sena, H Bart van der Worp, Philip M W Bath, David W Howells, Malcolm R Macleod |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010-03-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Biology |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?
by: H Bart van der Worp, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01) -
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
by: Konstantinos K Tsilidis, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01) -
Trans-Exclusionary, Transnational: Gender-Critical Feminism and the Overstatement of Harm in the UK and Germany
by: Eden Hills
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Systematic review and meta-analysis of therapeutic hypothermia in animal models of spinal cord injury.
by: Peter E Batchelor, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
by: Ana Antonic, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)