Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork
An E-panel, comprising an electronic nose (E-nose) and an electronic tongue (E-tongue), was used to distinguish the organoleptic characteristics of minced mutton adulterated with different proportions of pork. Meanwhile, the normalization, stepwise linear discriminant analysis (step-LDA), and princi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Food Quality |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4342509 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832548378958888960 |
|---|---|
| author | Xiaojing Tian Jun Wang Zhongren Ma Mingsheng Li Zhenbo Wei |
| author_facet | Xiaojing Tian Jun Wang Zhongren Ma Mingsheng Li Zhenbo Wei |
| author_sort | Xiaojing Tian |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | An E-panel, comprising an electronic nose (E-nose) and an electronic tongue (E-tongue), was used to distinguish the organoleptic characteristics of minced mutton adulterated with different proportions of pork. Meanwhile, the normalization, stepwise linear discriminant analysis (step-LDA), and principle component analysis were employed to merge the data matrix of E-nose and E-tongue. The discrimination results were evaluated and compared by canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and Bayesian discriminant analysis (BAD). It was shown that the capability of discrimination of the combined system (classification error 0%∼1.67%) was superior or equable to that obtained with the two instruments separately, and E-tongue system (classification error for E-tongue 0∼2.5%) obtained higher accuracy than E-nose (classification error 0.83%∼10.83% for E-nose). For the combined system, the combination of extracted data of 6 PCs of E-nose and 5 PCs of E-tongue was proved to be the most effective method. In order to predict the pork proportion in adulterated mutton, multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least square analysis (PLS), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) regression models were used, and the results were compared, aiming at building effective predictive models. Good correlations were found between the signals obtained from E-tongue, E-nose, and fusion data of E-nose and E-tongue and proportions of pork in minced mutton with correlation coefficients higher than 0.90 in the calibration and validation data sets. And BPNN was proved to be the most effective method for the prediction of pork proportions with R2 higher than 0.97 both for the calibration and validation data set. These results indicated that integration of E-nose and E-tongue could be a useful tool for the detection of mutton adulteration. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-10d0e4f3a07744aba044b0bcf6040bfc |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0146-9428 1745-4557 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Food Quality |
| spelling | doaj-art-10d0e4f3a07744aba044b0bcf6040bfc2025-02-03T06:14:08ZengWileyJournal of Food Quality0146-94281745-45572019-01-01201910.1155/2019/43425094342509Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with PorkXiaojing Tian0Jun Wang1Zhongren Ma2Mingsheng Li3Zhenbo Wei4Department of Biosystems Engineering, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 300058, ChinaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 300058, ChinaCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730024, ChinaCollege of Life Science and Engineering, Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou 730024, ChinaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Zhejiang University, 886 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 300058, ChinaAn E-panel, comprising an electronic nose (E-nose) and an electronic tongue (E-tongue), was used to distinguish the organoleptic characteristics of minced mutton adulterated with different proportions of pork. Meanwhile, the normalization, stepwise linear discriminant analysis (step-LDA), and principle component analysis were employed to merge the data matrix of E-nose and E-tongue. The discrimination results were evaluated and compared by canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and Bayesian discriminant analysis (BAD). It was shown that the capability of discrimination of the combined system (classification error 0%∼1.67%) was superior or equable to that obtained with the two instruments separately, and E-tongue system (classification error for E-tongue 0∼2.5%) obtained higher accuracy than E-nose (classification error 0.83%∼10.83% for E-nose). For the combined system, the combination of extracted data of 6 PCs of E-nose and 5 PCs of E-tongue was proved to be the most effective method. In order to predict the pork proportion in adulterated mutton, multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least square analysis (PLS), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN) regression models were used, and the results were compared, aiming at building effective predictive models. Good correlations were found between the signals obtained from E-tongue, E-nose, and fusion data of E-nose and E-tongue and proportions of pork in minced mutton with correlation coefficients higher than 0.90 in the calibration and validation data sets. And BPNN was proved to be the most effective method for the prediction of pork proportions with R2 higher than 0.97 both for the calibration and validation data set. These results indicated that integration of E-nose and E-tongue could be a useful tool for the detection of mutton adulteration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4342509 |
| spellingShingle | Xiaojing Tian Jun Wang Zhongren Ma Mingsheng Li Zhenbo Wei Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork Journal of Food Quality |
| title | Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork |
| title_full | Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork |
| title_fullStr | Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork |
| title_full_unstemmed | Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork |
| title_short | Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork |
| title_sort | combination of an e nose and an e tongue for adulteration detection of minced mutton mixed with pork |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4342509 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaojingtian combinationofanenoseandanetongueforadulterationdetectionofmincedmuttonmixedwithpork AT junwang combinationofanenoseandanetongueforadulterationdetectionofmincedmuttonmixedwithpork AT zhongrenma combinationofanenoseandanetongueforadulterationdetectionofmincedmuttonmixedwithpork AT mingshengli combinationofanenoseandanetongueforadulterationdetectionofmincedmuttonmixedwithpork AT zhenbowei combinationofanenoseandanetongueforadulterationdetectionofmincedmuttonmixedwithpork |