EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION
Regional Law 19/2019 introduced new tools for Negotiated Planning (NP) in Lombardy, aimed at facilitating collaboration between public and private entities. This law introduces various instruments for coordinating public and private entities, such as the Framework Agreement for Territorial Developme...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
DEI Tipografia del Genio Civile
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Valori e Valutazioni |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://siev.org/4-36-2024/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579283710640128 |
|---|---|
| author | Marta Dell’Ovo Marco Rossitti Francesca Torrieri Giulia Datola Danny Casprini Alessandra Oppio |
| author_facet | Marta Dell’Ovo Marco Rossitti Francesca Torrieri Giulia Datola Danny Casprini Alessandra Oppio |
| author_sort | Marta Dell’Ovo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Regional Law 19/2019 introduced new tools for Negotiated Planning (NP) in Lombardy, aimed at facilitating collaboration between public and private entities. This law introduces various instruments for coordinating public and private entities, such as the Framework Agreement for Territorial Development (Accordo Quadro di Sviluppo Territoriale - AQST), the Program Agreement (Accordo di Programma - AdP), the Simplified Local Agreement (Accordo Locale Semplificato - ALS) and the Agreement for Economic, Social, and Territorial Revitalization (Accordo di Rilancio Economico, Sociale e Territoriale - AREST). However, the assessment of regional interest and performance monitoring of NP proposals remain problematic due to the lack of transparent and replicable indicators. This research paper presents a multidimensional evaluation model, which introduces innovative criteria and indicators to evaluate NP proposals. With the support of multicriteria analysis as a reference evaluation methodology, the model relies on binary indicators to assess the programmatic, planning, territorial, environmental, social, economic-financial, employment and procedural coherence of the proposals. The application of the model to real case studies also makes it possible to test its effectiveness and improve the monitoring of NP instruments. The proposed model thus aims at improving the management and effectiveness of the NP instruments, offering a robust and replicable method for evaluation and monitoring. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0eb66a6b022841c297bc7e8322407884 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2036-2404 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | DEI Tipografia del Genio Civile |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Valori e Valutazioni |
| spelling | doaj-art-0eb66a6b022841c297bc7e83224078842025-01-30T12:22:01ZengDEI Tipografia del Genio CivileValori e Valutazioni2036-24042024-11-0136435810.48264/VVSIEV-20243604EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGIONMarta Dell’Ovo0Marco Rossitti1Francesca Torrieri2Giulia Datola3Danny Casprini4Alessandra Oppio5Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, via Bonardi 1 3, 20133 Milan, Italy Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, via Giuseppe Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, via Giuseppe Ponzio 31, 20133 Milan, Italy Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, via Bonardi 1 3, 20133 Milan, Italy Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, via Bonardi 1 3, 20133 Milan, Italy; Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering (DIG), Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4/b, Milano, 20156, ItalyDepartment of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, via Bonardi 1 3, 20133 Milan, ItalyRegional Law 19/2019 introduced new tools for Negotiated Planning (NP) in Lombardy, aimed at facilitating collaboration between public and private entities. This law introduces various instruments for coordinating public and private entities, such as the Framework Agreement for Territorial Development (Accordo Quadro di Sviluppo Territoriale - AQST), the Program Agreement (Accordo di Programma - AdP), the Simplified Local Agreement (Accordo Locale Semplificato - ALS) and the Agreement for Economic, Social, and Territorial Revitalization (Accordo di Rilancio Economico, Sociale e Territoriale - AREST). However, the assessment of regional interest and performance monitoring of NP proposals remain problematic due to the lack of transparent and replicable indicators. This research paper presents a multidimensional evaluation model, which introduces innovative criteria and indicators to evaluate NP proposals. With the support of multicriteria analysis as a reference evaluation methodology, the model relies on binary indicators to assess the programmatic, planning, territorial, environmental, social, economic-financial, employment and procedural coherence of the proposals. The application of the model to real case studies also makes it possible to test its effectiveness and improve the monitoring of NP instruments. The proposed model thus aims at improving the management and effectiveness of the NP instruments, offering a robust and replicable method for evaluation and monitoring.https://siev.org/4-36-2024/negotiated planningevaluation modelmulticriteria analysisdecision supportrating system |
| spellingShingle | Marta Dell’Ovo Marco Rossitti Francesca Torrieri Giulia Datola Danny Casprini Alessandra Oppio EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION Valori e Valutazioni negotiated planning evaluation model multicriteria analysis decision support rating system |
| title | EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION |
| title_full | EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION |
| title_fullStr | EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION |
| title_full_unstemmed | EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION |
| title_short | EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NEGOTIATED PLANNING TOOLS: THE CASE OF THE LOMBARDY REGION |
| title_sort | evaluating the effectiveness of negotiated planning tools the case of the lombardy region |
| topic | negotiated planning evaluation model multicriteria analysis decision support rating system |
| url | https://siev.org/4-36-2024/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martadellovo evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion AT marcorossitti evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion AT francescatorrieri evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion AT giuliadatola evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion AT dannycasprini evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion AT alessandraoppio evaluatingtheeffectivenessofnegotiatedplanningtoolsthecaseofthelombardyregion |