Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities
Cultural beliefs about what it means to be “good” at mathematics profoundly impact students’ perceptions of their abilities and how they come to see themselves in STEM. These beliefs can be traced back to dominant societal discourses about mathematical aptitude and achievement. These dominant discou...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Education Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/92 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832588603781283840 |
|---|---|
| author | Terrie Galanti Nancy Holincheck |
| author_facet | Terrie Galanti Nancy Holincheck |
| author_sort | Terrie Galanti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Cultural beliefs about what it means to be “good” at mathematics profoundly impact students’ perceptions of their abilities and how they come to see themselves in STEM. These beliefs can be traced back to dominant societal discourses about mathematical aptitude and achievement. These dominant discourses are communicated to students in a myriad of ways through family, friends, media, and overall societal norms. They reify deficit perspectives (often gendered, classed, and racialized) about who is or can be mathematically competent. In this investigation, we used a framework of dichotomies within dominant discourses about what it means to be “good” at mathematics to interpret retrospective narratives from a larger phenomenological study of accelerated mathematics course-taking. Focus group and individual interview data from two high-achieving young women were analyzed to understand how evolving beliefs about mathematical competence impacted their STEM identity development. These dichotomies explain the questioning of their mathematical competence and their subsequent decisions to decelerate from the most rigorous program of study at their high school. Our participants negotiated tensions in their STEM identities as a result of a mathematics culture that too often values speed, correctness, and competition over collaboration, productive struggle, and help-seeking. They continue to navigate these tensions as college students and as STEM majors. Our framework can be used to understand how mathematics experiences contribute to students’ struggles to develop robust STEM identities. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-0e15ce5afd304121b2218a689d681bf2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2227-7102 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Education Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-0e15ce5afd304121b2218a689d681bf22025-01-24T13:30:34ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022025-01-011519210.3390/educsci15010092Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM IdentitiesTerrie Galanti0Nancy Holincheck1Department of Teaching, Learning, and Curriculum, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USACollege of Education and Human Development, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USACultural beliefs about what it means to be “good” at mathematics profoundly impact students’ perceptions of their abilities and how they come to see themselves in STEM. These beliefs can be traced back to dominant societal discourses about mathematical aptitude and achievement. These dominant discourses are communicated to students in a myriad of ways through family, friends, media, and overall societal norms. They reify deficit perspectives (often gendered, classed, and racialized) about who is or can be mathematically competent. In this investigation, we used a framework of dichotomies within dominant discourses about what it means to be “good” at mathematics to interpret retrospective narratives from a larger phenomenological study of accelerated mathematics course-taking. Focus group and individual interview data from two high-achieving young women were analyzed to understand how evolving beliefs about mathematical competence impacted their STEM identity development. These dichotomies explain the questioning of their mathematical competence and their subsequent decisions to decelerate from the most rigorous program of study at their high school. Our participants negotiated tensions in their STEM identities as a result of a mathematics culture that too often values speed, correctness, and competition over collaboration, productive struggle, and help-seeking. They continue to navigate these tensions as college students and as STEM majors. Our framework can be used to understand how mathematics experiences contribute to students’ struggles to develop robust STEM identities.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/92identitygendermathematicsaccelerationalgebracalculus |
| spellingShingle | Terrie Galanti Nancy Holincheck Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities Education Sciences identity gender mathematics acceleration algebra calculus |
| title | Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities |
| title_full | Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities |
| title_fullStr | Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities |
| title_short | Dominant Discourses About What It Means to Be “Good” at Mathematics: How High-Achieving Young Women Negotiate Tensions Within Their Evolving STEM Identities |
| title_sort | dominant discourses about what it means to be good at mathematics how high achieving young women negotiate tensions within their evolving stem identities |
| topic | identity gender mathematics acceleration algebra calculus |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/1/92 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT terriegalanti dominantdiscoursesaboutwhatitmeanstobegoodatmathematicshowhighachievingyoungwomennegotiatetensionswithintheirevolvingstemidentities AT nancyholincheck dominantdiscoursesaboutwhatitmeanstobegoodatmathematicshowhighachievingyoungwomennegotiatetensionswithintheirevolvingstemidentities |