Metacognitive strategies and critical thinking in elevating EFL argumentative writing proficiency: Practical insights
This study utilized Kemmis et al.’s (2014) action research paradigm. It implemented a two-cycle action study within a single semester, encompassing four stages of learning tasks: comprehension of the problem, monitoring of students’ learning activities, problem-solving, assessment, and concluding. E...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Noldy Pelenkahu, Muhammad Ilham Ali, Devilito Prasetyo Tatipang, Ceisy Nita Wuntu, Olga Anneke Rorintulus |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Syiah Kuala
2024-06-01
|
Series: | Studies in English Language and Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/35832 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Metacognitive Beliefs in Alexithymic Individuals
by: Zekiye Celikbas, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Academic vocabulary for L2 argumentative writing: Perspectives from Chinese university EFL learners
by: Changyong Min, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Educating Preschoolers to Pro-Environmental Actions: A Metacognition-Based Approach
by: Martina Rulli, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
Analysis of metacognitive characteristics in group discussion on grade 5 fraction materials
by: Dyah Triwahyuningtyas, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Time is Confidence: Monetary Incentives Metacognitive Profile on Duration Judgment
by: Mitra Taghizadeh Sarabi, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)