The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia

Treaty law recognizes the terms debt and receivables, but in the legal regulations of agreements or beyond it, it turns out that what is meant by debt and receivables is very limited in its explanation. Likewise, default whose definition appears only limited to the opinions of experts. Regulation w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Inri Januar, Budi Santoso, Rachmi Sulistyarini, Indah Dwi Qurbani
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Yayasan Pendidikan Islam dan Multikultural 2024-12-01
Series:International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.yaspim.org/index.php/IJIERM/article/view/406
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575495252738048
author Inri Januar
Budi Santoso
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Indah Dwi Qurbani
author_facet Inri Januar
Budi Santoso
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Indah Dwi Qurbani
author_sort Inri Januar
collection DOAJ
description Treaty law recognizes the terms debt and receivables, but in the legal regulations of agreements or beyond it, it turns out that what is meant by debt and receivables is very limited in its explanation. Likewise, default whose definition appears only limited to the opinions of experts. Regulation will be very important because debts, receivables and defaults have legal consequences for creditors or debtors. Thus, it is very necessary to include the definition of debt, receivables and defaults in laws and regulations to provide certainty and legal protection for the parties to the engagement, especially the law of agreements. The type of research used is normative juridical research using primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations, secondary, namely books by law scholars and tertiary materials in the form of dictionaries. The approach used is a conceptual approach and a legislative approach. From the results of the study, there is a void in norms regarding receivables. Receivables in general cannot arise without obligation, for certain conditions receivables may arise without prior obligation. Receivables are not only the opposite of the word debt. Receivables are the right to sue given by law. In this case, receivables can be interpreted as protection provided by the state to the subject in the law of the agreement. Default is not the same as debt and a defaulter cannot have receivables.
format Article
id doaj-art-0771b609395140299926b3d804825d30
institution Kabale University
issn 2656-3630
2722-7049
language Arabic
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Yayasan Pendidikan Islam dan Multikultural
record_format Article
series International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism
spelling doaj-art-0771b609395140299926b3d804825d302025-02-01T03:44:23ZaraYayasan Pendidikan Islam dan MultikulturalInternational Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism2656-36302722-70492024-12-016310.47006/ijierm.v6i3.406The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in IndonesiaInri Januar0Budi Santoso1Rachmi Sulistyarini2Indah Dwi Qurbani 3Brawijiaya University, Law Faculty, Malang, East Java, IndonesiaBrawijiaya University, Law Faculty, Malang, East Java, IndonesiaBrawijiaya University, Law Faculty, Malang, East Java, IndonesiaBrawijiaya University, Law Faculty, Malang, East Java, Indonesia Treaty law recognizes the terms debt and receivables, but in the legal regulations of agreements or beyond it, it turns out that what is meant by debt and receivables is very limited in its explanation. Likewise, default whose definition appears only limited to the opinions of experts. Regulation will be very important because debts, receivables and defaults have legal consequences for creditors or debtors. Thus, it is very necessary to include the definition of debt, receivables and defaults in laws and regulations to provide certainty and legal protection for the parties to the engagement, especially the law of agreements. The type of research used is normative juridical research using primary legal materials, namely laws and regulations, secondary, namely books by law scholars and tertiary materials in the form of dictionaries. The approach used is a conceptual approach and a legislative approach. From the results of the study, there is a void in norms regarding receivables. Receivables in general cannot arise without obligation, for certain conditions receivables may arise without prior obligation. Receivables are not only the opposite of the word debt. Receivables are the right to sue given by law. In this case, receivables can be interpreted as protection provided by the state to the subject in the law of the agreement. Default is not the same as debt and a defaulter cannot have receivables. https://journal.yaspim.org/index.php/IJIERM/article/view/406Debt,Receivable,Default.
spellingShingle Inri Januar
Budi Santoso
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Indah Dwi Qurbani
The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism
Debt,
Receivable,
Default.
title The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
title_full The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
title_short The Relationship Between Debt, Default, and Receivables in Contract Law in Indonesia
title_sort relationship between debt default and receivables in contract law in indonesia
topic Debt,
Receivable,
Default.
url https://journal.yaspim.org/index.php/IJIERM/article/view/406
work_keys_str_mv AT inrijanuar therelationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT budisantoso therelationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT rachmisulistyarini therelationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT indahdwiqurbani therelationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT inrijanuar relationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT budisantoso relationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT rachmisulistyarini relationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia
AT indahdwiqurbani relationshipbetweendebtdefaultandreceivablesincontractlawinindonesia