Clarifying Misconceptions and Recentring the Debate on Heritable Human Genome Editing in South Africa: A Response to De Vries
This article responds to recent criticisms by Professor Jantina de Vries regarding my research group's position on the legal status of heritable human genome editing (HHGE) in South Africa. De Vries challenges our interpretation of section 57 of the National Health Act (NHA), questions the met...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Donrich Thaldar |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Afrikaans |
| Published: |
North-West University
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/21163 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
In defence of South Africa’s National Health Research Ethics Council guidelines on heritable human genome editing
by: Donrich Thaldar, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Heritable human genome editing in South Africa – time for a reality check
by: M Ramsay, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Statutory interpretation by the late Sir Rupert Cross / John Bell
by: Bell, John
Published: (2005) -
Marek Słupczewski, Inference per analogiam in tax law, Publisher: Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw 2022, ISBN 978-83-8328-722-5, pp. 335
by: Bogumił Brzeziński
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Right of reply - Response to: In defence of South Africa’s National Health Research Ethics Council guidelines on heritable human genome editing
by: M Ramsay, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)