Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund

The article addresses the participatory budgeting (PB), which is one of the most recognised governance innovations of recent decades. This global phenomenon represents in practice a shift towards participatory and collaborative management of public resources at the local level. The purpose of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawid Sześciło, Bartosz Wilk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2018-11-01
Series:Central European Public Administration Review
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20494
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591490397765632
author Dawid Sześciło
Bartosz Wilk
author_facet Dawid Sześciło
Bartosz Wilk
author_sort Dawid Sześciło
collection DOAJ
description The article addresses the participatory budgeting (PB), which is one of the most recognised governance innovations of recent decades. This global phenomenon represents in practice a shift towards participatory and collaborative management of public resources at the local level. The purpose of this article is to determine when top down approach to PB might be welcomed, taking into account the characteristics of PB schemes all around the world that they emerged as local initiatives, instigated either by civil society groups or local governments. The analysis is based on the description of the PB example as introduced via country-wide legislation, exhaustively regulating PB procedure. The article examines Polish experience in the field of functioning top down approach to PB. It demonstrates that top down PB can effectively work, if it is accompanied with significant incentives and grants, as well as the extensive autonomy and flexibility of local communities. Polish experience suggests that such an initiative might be relatively successful, yet there is a number of conditions that has to be met in order to ensure the dissemination of legislative model of participatory budgeting. The results have practical implications to central government institutions that consider introduction of some legislative framework for participatory budgeting at the local level. The originality of the research is in the analysis of one of successful stories of the PB introduced via country-wide legislation, and determining when this approach can work, also in other countries.
format Article
id doaj-art-053dd01eaf7b4e46867a8235249903d4
institution Kabale University
issn 2591-2240
2591-2259
language English
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Central European Public Administration Review
spelling doaj-art-053dd01eaf7b4e46867a8235249903d42025-01-22T10:51:42ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592018-11-0116210.17573/cepar.2018.2.09Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community FundDawid Sześciło0Bartosz Wilk1Public Administration Research Unit, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of WarsawPublic Administration Research Unit, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw The article addresses the participatory budgeting (PB), which is one of the most recognised governance innovations of recent decades. This global phenomenon represents in practice a shift towards participatory and collaborative management of public resources at the local level. The purpose of this article is to determine when top down approach to PB might be welcomed, taking into account the characteristics of PB schemes all around the world that they emerged as local initiatives, instigated either by civil society groups or local governments. The analysis is based on the description of the PB example as introduced via country-wide legislation, exhaustively regulating PB procedure. The article examines Polish experience in the field of functioning top down approach to PB. It demonstrates that top down PB can effectively work, if it is accompanied with significant incentives and grants, as well as the extensive autonomy and flexibility of local communities. Polish experience suggests that such an initiative might be relatively successful, yet there is a number of conditions that has to be met in order to ensure the dissemination of legislative model of participatory budgeting. The results have practical implications to central government institutions that consider introduction of some legislative framework for participatory budgeting at the local level. The originality of the research is in the analysis of one of successful stories of the PB introduced via country-wide legislation, and determining when this approach can work, also in other countries. https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20494
spellingShingle Dawid Sześciło
Bartosz Wilk
Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
Central European Public Administration Review
title Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
title_full Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
title_fullStr Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
title_full_unstemmed Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
title_short Can Top Down Participatory Budgeting Work? The Case of Polish Community Fund
title_sort can top down participatory budgeting work the case of polish community fund
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20494
work_keys_str_mv AT dawidszesciło cantopdownparticipatorybudgetingworkthecaseofpolishcommunityfund
AT bartoszwilk cantopdownparticipatorybudgetingworkthecaseofpolishcommunityfund