Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program
Understanding farmers’ breeding systems and preferred traits is crucial for establishing effective genetic improvement programs. This study investigated Gudali cattle breed selection, breeding objectives, and selection criteria in North-east Benin (Malanville and Tchaourou). We surveyed 120 Gudali c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Animal Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2024.1454071/full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832592396355895296 |
---|---|
author | Loukaiya Zorobouragui Loukaiya Zorobouragui Isidore Houaga Isidore Houaga Alassan S. Assani Hilaire S. S. Worogo Lionel Kinkpe Kathiravan Periasamy Ibrahim T. Alkoiret |
author_facet | Loukaiya Zorobouragui Loukaiya Zorobouragui Isidore Houaga Isidore Houaga Alassan S. Assani Hilaire S. S. Worogo Lionel Kinkpe Kathiravan Periasamy Ibrahim T. Alkoiret |
author_sort | Loukaiya Zorobouragui |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Understanding farmers’ breeding systems and preferred traits is crucial for establishing effective genetic improvement programs. This study investigated Gudali cattle breed selection, breeding objectives, and selection criteria in North-east Benin (Malanville and Tchaourou). We surveyed 120 Gudali cattle farmers using a structured questionnaire and conducted hierarchical clustering using R software. We identified the distribution of farmers based on herd composition and production systems. Farmers were grouped into four classes: Sedentary Purebreds (16.67%), Transhumant Purebreds (33.33%), Sedentary Mixed Breeds (34.17%), and Transhumant Mixed Breeds (15.83%), with average Gudali herd sizes ranging from 23.68 to 90.11 heads depending on the system. The overall average herd size was 42.67 ± 6.00 heads. The majority of farmers owned different breeds, including Borgou (26.67%), Yakana (26.67%), and Azawak (7.5%), with only 32.5% having Gudali only herds. Farmers chose Gudali cattle for their milk production, good growth and market value, with 96.67% prioritizing milk production. The main selection criterion was coat color in all breeding systems with respective indices of 0.59; 0.57; 0.54 and 0.47 respectively for sedentary purebred; sedentary mixed breed; transhumant purebred and transhumant mixed breed systems. Most mixed breed farmers (55.84%) cross Gudali with local breeds for better dairy performance. While only 3.33% of farmers were aware of community-based breeding programs (CBBP), there was strong interest (95%) in participating. Potential challenges such as access to feed and disease management were reported. The proposed mitigation strategies include establishing pasture areas and strengthening collaboration among stakeholders. Implementing CBBP programs by incorporating farmers’ preferences and practices, could sustainably improve Gudali cattle productivity and resilience in Benin. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-01659cf18b0f4a52a848f2793a877908 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2673-6225 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Animal Science |
spelling | doaj-art-01659cf18b0f4a52a848f2793a8779082025-01-21T08:36:45ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Animal Science2673-62252025-01-01510.3389/fanim.2024.14540711454071Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding programLoukaiya Zorobouragui0Loukaiya Zorobouragui1Isidore Houaga2Isidore Houaga3Alassan S. Assani4Hilaire S. S. Worogo5Lionel Kinkpe6Kathiravan Periasamy7Ibrahim T. Alkoiret8Laboratory of Ecology, Health and Animal Production (LESPA), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Parakou, Parakou, BeninAnimal Production and Health Laboratory, Department of Nuclear Applications, Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/International Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/IAEA) Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, AustriaThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomCentre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomLaboratory of Ecology, Health and Animal Production (LESPA), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Parakou, Parakou, BeninLaboratory of Ecology, Health and Animal Production (LESPA), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Parakou, Parakou, BeninAnimal Breeding Genetics and Reproduction, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling, ChinaAnimal Production and Health Laboratory, Department of Nuclear Applications, Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/International Atomic Energy Agency (FAO/IAEA) Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, AustriaLaboratory of Ecology, Health and Animal Production (LESPA), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Parakou, Parakou, BeninUnderstanding farmers’ breeding systems and preferred traits is crucial for establishing effective genetic improvement programs. This study investigated Gudali cattle breed selection, breeding objectives, and selection criteria in North-east Benin (Malanville and Tchaourou). We surveyed 120 Gudali cattle farmers using a structured questionnaire and conducted hierarchical clustering using R software. We identified the distribution of farmers based on herd composition and production systems. Farmers were grouped into four classes: Sedentary Purebreds (16.67%), Transhumant Purebreds (33.33%), Sedentary Mixed Breeds (34.17%), and Transhumant Mixed Breeds (15.83%), with average Gudali herd sizes ranging from 23.68 to 90.11 heads depending on the system. The overall average herd size was 42.67 ± 6.00 heads. The majority of farmers owned different breeds, including Borgou (26.67%), Yakana (26.67%), and Azawak (7.5%), with only 32.5% having Gudali only herds. Farmers chose Gudali cattle for their milk production, good growth and market value, with 96.67% prioritizing milk production. The main selection criterion was coat color in all breeding systems with respective indices of 0.59; 0.57; 0.54 and 0.47 respectively for sedentary purebred; sedentary mixed breed; transhumant purebred and transhumant mixed breed systems. Most mixed breed farmers (55.84%) cross Gudali with local breeds for better dairy performance. While only 3.33% of farmers were aware of community-based breeding programs (CBBP), there was strong interest (95%) in participating. Potential challenges such as access to feed and disease management were reported. The proposed mitigation strategies include establishing pasture areas and strengthening collaboration among stakeholders. Implementing CBBP programs by incorporating farmers’ preferences and practices, could sustainably improve Gudali cattle productivity and resilience in Benin.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2024.1454071/fullcriteriaselectioncattleCBBPtraditional knowledgelivestock improvement |
spellingShingle | Loukaiya Zorobouragui Loukaiya Zorobouragui Isidore Houaga Isidore Houaga Alassan S. Assani Hilaire S. S. Worogo Lionel Kinkpe Kathiravan Periasamy Ibrahim T. Alkoiret Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program Frontiers in Animal Science criteria selection cattle CBBP traditional knowledge livestock improvement |
title | Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program |
title_full | Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program |
title_fullStr | Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program |
title_full_unstemmed | Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program |
title_short | Breeding practices and selection criteria in Gudali cattle breed from Benin: implications for the design of a community-based breeding program |
title_sort | breeding practices and selection criteria in gudali cattle breed from benin implications for the design of a community based breeding program |
topic | criteria selection cattle CBBP traditional knowledge livestock improvement |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2024.1454071/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loukaiyazorobouragui breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT loukaiyazorobouragui breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT isidorehouaga breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT isidorehouaga breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT alassansassani breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT hilairessworogo breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT lionelkinkpe breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT kathiravanperiasamy breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram AT ibrahimtalkoiret breedingpracticesandselectioncriteriaingudalicattlebreedfrombeninimplicationsforthedesignofacommunitybasedbreedingprogram |