Search alternatives:
implications » applications (Expand Search), application (Expand Search)
Showing 681 - 700 results of 34,205 for search 'implications study', query time: 0.26s Refine Results
  1. 681
  2. 682
  3. 683
  4. 684
  5. 685

    Fluconazole Resistance and Heteroresistance in Cryptococcus spp.: Mechanisms and Implications by Izabela de Mesquita Bárcia Moreira, Naira Sulany Oliveira de Sousa, Juan Diego Ribeiro de Almeida, Robert Langlady Lira Rosas Filho, Katia Santana Cruz, Ani Beatriz Jackisch Matsuura, Márcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem, Érica Simplício de Souza, Hagen Frickmann, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda, João Vicente Braga de Souza

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…This review addresses the underlying mechanisms of antifungal resistance, the evolution of methods for determining antifungal susceptibility, and the clinical implications of Cryptococcus heteroresistance to fluconazole. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 686
  7. 687
  8. 688
  9. 689
  10. 690
  11. 691
  12. 692
  13. 693
  14. 694
  15. 695
  16. 696
  17. 697

    Macrostructures and rhetorical moves in research articles in nanotechnology by Xianqing Luo, Jiajie Ji

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…IntroductionNotwithstanding the fact that extensive studies focused on exploring generic structures in established disciplines, scant attention has been directed to macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in some emerging disciplines.MethodsBased on a self-compiled corpus of 50 research articles (RAs) from five top ranking journals in the field of Nanotechnology, we explored the macrostructures and rhetorical moves in RAs in Nanotechnology.ResultsIt was found that (i) scientists in Nanotechnology have a propensity to employ a merged [R&D] structure to immediately discuss and contribute new knowledge tentatively in the specific contextualised situation after research results were presented, (ii) Even though RAs in Nanotechnology largely follows IMRD structure by abiding writing conventions in the research world, disciplinary variations were found regarding the rhetorical structures, specifically, scientists in Nanotechnology tend to employ more moves and steps in establishing research niche, detailed description of research methods, suggesting future research, but less moves and steps related to promotional strategies (M3S4, M3S5, M3S6).DiscussionThe research results have significant implications for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) instructors to make informed choices by using disciplinary empirical-based decisions to guide novice writers and students at tertiary level to write RAs by following disciplinary conventions of research communities in Nanotechnology so as to avoid overgeneralization.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 698
  19. 699
  20. 700