Search alternatives:
errors » error (Expand Search)
Showing 1,441 - 1,460 results of 1,673 for search 'forest errors', query time: 0.10s Refine Results
  1. 1441

    A multi-model approach for estimation of ash yield in coal using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy by Sameeksha Mishra, Anup K. Prasad, Arya Vinod, Anubhav Shukla, Shailayee Mukherjee, Bitan Purkait, Atul K. Varma, Bhabesh C. Sarkar

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…This method outperforms individual models with a coefficient of determination – R-squared (R2) of 0.883, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 3.059 wt%, RMSE in percentage (RMSE%) of 30.080, Mean Bias Error in percentage (MBE%) of 3.694, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 2.249 wt%. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 1442

    A Comparative Analysis of Different Algorithms for Estimating Evapotranspiration with Limited Observation Variables: A Case Study in Beijing, China by Di Sun, Hang Zhang, Yanbing Qi, Yanmin Ren, Zhengxian Zhang, Xuemin Li, Yuping Lv, Minghan Cheng

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Long-term remote sensing data can furnish a more comprehensive background field for the LST-VI space, achieving superior fitting accuracy for wet and dry edges, thereby enabling precise ET estimation with the following metrics: correlation coefficient (r) = 0.68, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.76 mm/d, mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.49 mm/d, and mean bias error (MBE) = −0.14 mm. (2) ML generally produces more accurate ET estimates, with the Random Forest Regressor (RFR) demonstrating the highest accuracy: r = 0.79, RMSE = 0.61 mm/d, MAE = 0.42 mm/d, and MBE = −0.02 mm. (3) Both ET estimates derived from the LST-VI space and ML exhibit spatial distribution characteristics comparable to those of MOD16 ET data, further attesting to the efficacy of these two algorithms. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 1443

    Machine learning-based forecasting of daily acute ischemic stroke admissions using weather data by Nandhini Santhanam, Hee E. Kim, David Rügamer, Andreas Bender, Stefan Muthers, Chang Gyu Cho, Angelika Alonso, Kristina Szabo, Franz-Simon Centner, Holger Wenz, Thomas Ganslandt, Michael Platten, Christoph Groden, Michael Neumaier, Fabian Siegel, Máté E. Maros

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Poisson regression, boosted generalized additive models, support vector machines, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were evaluated within a time-stratified nested cross-validation framework. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 1444

    A novel framework for assessing shrublines and their geophysical constraints in alpine regions through probabilistic vegetation mapping and seed-filling algorithm by Zexi Ren, Lin Zhang, Qianlong Wang, Wanjun Hu, Zhou Shi

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…In this study, we proposed a novel framework to map alpine shrublines in Xizang Rezhen National Forest Park in 2020 using multi-source spatial data, probabilistic vegetation mapping, and seed-filling algorithm. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 1445

    Ensemble Learning-Driven and UAV Multispectral Analysis for Estimating the Leaf Nitrogen Content in Winter Wheat by Yu Han, Jiaxue Zhang, Yan Bai, Zihao Liang, Xinhui Guo, Yu Zhao, Meichen Feng, Lujie Xiao, Xiaoyan Song, Meijun Zhang, Wude Yang, Guangxin Li, Sha Yang, Xingxing Qiao, Chao Wang

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Ridge Regression (RR), K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), and ensemble learning algorithms (Voting and Stacking) were employed to model the relationship between selected vegetation indices and LNC. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 1446

    Validating a Bayesian Spatio-Temporal Model to Predict La Crosse Virus Human Incidence in the Appalachian Mountain Region, USA by Maggie McCarter, Stella C. W. Self, Huixuan Li, Joseph A. Ewing, Lídia Gual-Gonzalez, Mufaro Kanyangarara, Melissa S. Nolan

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Model prediction error was low, less than 2%, indicating high accuracy in predicting annual LACV human incidence at the county level. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 1447

    Developing data driven framework to model earthquake induced liquefaction potential of granular terrain by machine learning classification models by Kennedy C. Onyelowe, Viroon Kamchoom, Tammineni Gnananandarao, Krishna P. Arunachalam

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…In the same way, several experiments were conducted with a fixed value of C and ∂ kernel specific parameters in order to determine an appropriate value of error-insensitive zone (∋).Similarly, for the random forest classifier (RFC) model, the number of variables used (m) and the number of trees to be grown (k) are two user-defined parameters. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 1448

    Synergistic mapping of urban tree canopy height using ICESat-2 data and GF-2 imagery by Xiaodi Xu, Ya Zhang, Peng Fu, Chaoya Dang, Bowen Cai, Qingwei Zhuang, Zhenfeng Shao, Deren Li, Qing Ding

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…The experimental results demonstrated a moderate correlation between estimated and actual canopy heights, with a coefficient of determination (R) = 0.53, root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.9 m, and mean absolute error (MAE) = 2.04 m. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 1449

    A machine learning approach to predict phyllosphere resistome abundance across urbanization gradients by Rui-Ao Ma, Yi-Hui Ding, Shifa Zhong, Ting-Ting Jing, Xuechu Chen, Si-Yu Zhang

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…Among the five tested algorithms tested in the machine learning models (ridge regression, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and neural network), the random forest algorithm achieved the highest accuracy with the lowest root mean square error (27.24 vs. 40.79–46.79 for the other models). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 1450

    Research on Monitoring Oceanic Precipitable Water Vapor and Short-Term Rainfall Forecasting Using Low-Cost Global Navigation Satellite System Buoy by Maosheng Zhou, Pengcheng Wang, Zelu Ji, Yunzhou Li, Dingfeng Yu, Zengzhou Hao, Min Li, Delu Pan

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Furthermore, a Random Forest model based on multiple meteorological parameters optimizes precipitation forecasting, especially in reducing false alarms. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 1451

    Identify suitable artificial groundwater recharge zones using hybrid deep learning models by Navaz Khalillollahi, Mohsen Isari, Hamed Faroqi, Kaywan Othman Ahmed, Kamran Nobakht Vakili, Miklas Scholz, Saad Sh. Sammeng

    Published 2025-09-01
    “…In addition, two feature selection methods, namely Mutual Information (MI) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to identify the most significant factors. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 1452

    Assessment of water fluxes under the dual threat of changes in land cover and climate variability in the Brazilian Cerrado biome by Dimaghi Schwamback, Abderraman R. Amorim Brandão, Ronny Berndtsson, Edson Wendland, Magnus Persson

    Published 2025-10-01
    “…The study included (i) calibration and validation of the Hydrus model through observations of soil moisture in experimental plots covered with sugarcane and pasture compared to natural forest during six years and (ii) hydrological predictions by combining Hydrus with projections from climate models (10 CMIP6 models under SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 1453

    Global surface eddy mixing ellipses: spatio-temporal variability and machine learning prediction by Tian Jing, Ru Chen, Chuanyu Liu, Chunhua Qiu, Chunhua Qiu, Cuicui Zhang, Mei Hong

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…We also assessed the predictability of global mixing ellipses using machine learning algorithms, including Spatial Transformer Networks (STN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Random Forest (RF), with mean-flow and eddy- properties as features. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 1454

    Long-Term Predictive Modelling of the Craniofacial Complex Using Machine Learning on 2D Cephalometric Radiographs by Michael Myers, Michael D. Brown, Sarkhan Badirli, George J. Eckert, Diane Helen-Marie Johnson, Hakan Turkkahraman

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Three ML models—Lasso regression, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression (SVR)—were trained on a subset of 240 subjects, while 61 subjects were used for testing. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 1455

    Software Defects Identification: Results Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques by Momotaz Begum, Mehedi Hasan Shuvo, Imran Ashraf, Abdullah Al Mamun, Jia Uddin, Md Abdus Samad

    Published 2023-01-01
    “…Among them, XGBR outperformed, considering the accuracy, mean square error, and R2 score. We also used Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Local Interpretable Model (LIME), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to determine software fault features. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 1456

    Soft-computing models for predicting plastic viscosity and interface yield stress of fresh concrete by Waleed Bin Inqiad, Muhammad Faisal Javed, Deema Mohammed Alsekait, Naseer Muhammad Khan, Majid Khan, Fahid Aslam, Diaa Salama Abd Elminaam

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The performance of the developed algorithms was assessed using several error metrices, k-fold validation, and residual assessment etc. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 1457

    Combining machine learning algorithms for bridging gaps in GRACE and GRACE Follow-On missions using ERA5-Land reanalysis by Jaydeo K. Dharpure, Ian M. Howat, Saurabh Kaushik, Bryan G. Mark

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Unlike previous studies, we use a combination of Machine Learning (ML) methods—Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Stacked Long-Short Term Memory (SLSTM)—to identify and efficiently bridge the gap between GRACE and GFO by using the best-performing ML model to estimate TWSA at each grid cell. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 1458

    Leveraging petrophysical and geological constraints for AI-driven predictions of total organic carbon (TOC) and hardness in unconventional reservoir prospects by Nandito Davy, Ammar El-Husseiny, Umair bin Waheed, Korhan Ayranci, Manzar Fawad, Mohamed Mahmoud, Nicholas B. Harris

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…This study examines the impact of incorporating these constraints on prediction accuracy using four manually fine-tuned ML algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regression (SVR), XGBoost (XGB), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 1459

    Crosswalk between HRSD and MADRS outcomes for rTMS in patients with depression by Xiao Chen, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Daniel M Blumberger, Jonathan Downar, Chao-Gan Yan, Tyler S Kaster

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…We used five crosswalk models: (1) a pharmacotherapy equipercentile model, (2) an rTMS equipercentile model, (3) a linear regression model, (4) a random forest (RF) regression model and (5) a support vector regression (SVR) model. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 1460

    An Integrated Hybrid-Stochastic Framework for Agro-Meteorological Prediction Under Environmental Uncertainty by Mohsen Pourmohammad Shahvar, Davide Valenti, Alfonso Collura, Salvatore Micciche, Vittorio Farina, Giovanni Marsella

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Machine learning models, including random forest and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were hybridized to improve the prediction accuracy for both proxy yield and wind components (U and V that represent the east–west and north–south wind movement). …”
    Get full text
    Article