Search alternatives:
errors » error (Expand Search)
Showing 1,101 - 1,120 results of 1,673 for search 'forest errors', query time: 0.13s Refine Results
  1. 1101

    Artificial Intelligence Optimization for User Prediction and Efficient Energy Distribution in Electric Vehicle Smart Charging Systems by Siow Jat Shern, Md Tanjil Sarker, Mohammed Hussein Saleh Mohammed Haram, Gobbi Ramasamy, Siva Priya Thiagarajah, Fahmid Al Farid

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…Among the models, XGBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), making it the most effective for real-time user demand prediction in smart charging scenarios. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 1102

    Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium–Ion Batteries Based on Mode Decomposition and ED-LSTM by Bingzeng Song, Guangzhao Yue, Dong Guo, Hanming Wu, Yonghai Sun, Yuhua Li, Bin Zhou

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…The root mean square error decreased by 72%, 59%, 70%, and 54%, and the mean absolute percent error decreased by 75%, 65%, 71%, and 58%, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 1103

    Presentation of a Novel Method for Prediction of Traffic with Climate Condition Based on Ensemble Learning of Neural Architecture Search (NAS) and Linear Regression by Javad Artin, Amin Valizadeh, Mohsen Ahmadi, Sathish A. P. Kumar, Abbas Sharifi

    Published 2021-01-01
    “…We have analyzed linear regression with the results obtained in the project; this method was more efficient than other regression models. This method had an error of 0.00002 in terms of MSE criteria and SVR, random forest, and MLP methods, which have error values of 0.01033, 0.00003, and 0.0011, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 1104

    Total Precipitable Water Retrieval from FY-3D MWHS-II Data by Yifan Zhang, Geng-Ming Jiang

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Against the radiosonde TPWs, the mean error (ME), the root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) of the TPWs retrieved in this work are −1.17 mm, 3.46 mm, and 2.63 mm over sea surfaces, respectively, and they are −0.80 mm, 4.04 mm, and 3.13 mm over land surfaces, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 1105

    The Short-Term Wind Power Forecasting by Utilizing Machine Learning and Hybrid Deep Learning Frameworks by Sunku V.S., Namboodiri V., Mukkamala R.

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…In pursuit of these objectives, the CNN GRU model was rigorously tested and compared against three additional models: CNN with bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and random forest (RF). Key performance metrics—namely, mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²)—were employed to assess the efficacy of each model. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 1106

    State of Charge Prediction of Mine-Used LiFePO<sub>4</sub> Battery Based on PSO-Catboost by Dazhong Wang, Yinghui Chang, Pengfei Ji, Yanchun Suo, Ning Chen

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…Compared with the Catboost model, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of the PSO-Catboost model decreased by 12.4% and 25.4% during charging and decreased by 5.5% and 12.2% during discharging. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 1107

    Predicting the Tensile Strength of Plant Leaves Based on GA-SVM by Wei Chang, Meihong Liu, Yayu Huang, Junjie Lei, Kai Wu

    Published 2025-12-01
    “…A comparative analysis with other predictive algorithms demonstrates that the GA-SVM model achieves the lowest prediction error and highest accuracy, with mean absolute error and root mean squared error values of 0.0774 and 0.0745, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 1108

    Utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Topographic Survey Using Ground Control Points (GCP) from Geodetic GNSS by Nizamuddin Nizamuddin, Freddy Sapta Wirandha, Ardiansyah Ardiansyah

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…Aerial photos that previously had an error rate of 2-7 meters, after being bound with GCP points, the error rate decreased to below 1 meter. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 1109

    Optimized machine learning algorithms with SHAP analysis for predicting compressive strength in high-performance concrete by Samuel Olaoluwa Abioye, Yusuf Olawale Babatunde, Oluwafikejimi Abigail Abikoye, Aisha Nene Shaibu, Bailey Jonathan Bankole

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Among those analyzed, XGBoost and GBR achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with R2 values of 93.49% and 92.09% respectively, coupled with lower mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 1110

    Recognition Method of Corn and Rice Crop Growth State Based on Computer Image Processing Technology by Li Tian, Chun Wang, Hailiang Li, Haitian Sun

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…Segmentation result error of the recognition method is also reduced significantly.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 1111

    Advanced machine learning techniques for predicting mechanical properties of eco-friendly self-compacting concrete by Arslan Qayyum Khan, Syed Ghulam Muhammad, Ali Raza, Amorn Pimanmas

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…The models' predictive accuracies were assessed using the coefficient of determination, mean squared error, root mean squared error, and mean absolute error. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 1112

    SAER : Comparison of Rule Prediction Algorithms on Constructing a Corpus for Taxation Related Tweet Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis by Annisa Mufidah Sopian, Ridwan Ilyas, Fatan Kasyidi, Asep Id Hadiana

    Published 2024-05-01
    “…In rule prediction, comparison results show that Support Vector Regression (SVR) was identified as the most effective model for aspects rule prediction, providing the best results with a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.022, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.150, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.123. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 1113

    A novel hybrid model for predicting the bearing capacity of piles by Li Tao, Xinhua Xue

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…Six statistical indices (e.g., coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), relative root mean squared error (RRMSE), BIAS and discrepancy ratio (DR)) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 1114

    Shale volume estimation using machine learning methods from the southwestern fields of Iran by Parirokh Ebrahimi, Ali Ranjbar, Yousef Kazemzadeh, Ali Akbari

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The models were evaluated based on performance metrics such as correlation coefficient (R2), average relative error (ARE), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean squared error (MSE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 1115

    AI-driven competency recommendations based on attendance patterns and academic performance by Junaidi, Teguh Wahyono, Irwan Sembiring

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Gradient Boosting (GB) was the most effective model for weighting discipline and learning outcomes (Mean Squared Error [MSE]: 2.9224, Root Mean Squared Error [RMSE]: 1.4252, Coefficient of Determination [R2]: 0.9667), outperforming three alternatives. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 1116
  17. 1117

    Causal Physics-Infused Hybrid Learning (CPIHL) Framework for Next-Gen Battery Health Forecasting by Sahar Qaadan, Aiman Alshare, Rami Alazrai, Alexander Popp, Benedikt Schmuelling

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The CPIHL model demonstrates exceptional performance, achieving an R2 score of 0.9994, a mean absolute error of 0.0007, and a root mean square error of 0.0025, outperforming all baseline machine learning and deep learning models, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Networks, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Units. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 1118

    Machine learning–based feature prediction of convergence zones in ocean front environments by Weishuai Xu, Lei Zhang, Hua Wang

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…The model achieved an accuracy of 82.43% in predicting the convergence zone’s distance with an error of less than 1 km. Additionally, it attained a 77.1% accuracy in predicting the convergence zone’s width within a similar error range. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 1119

    Comparison of Trivariate Copula-Based Conditional Quantile Regression Versus Machine Learning Methods for Estimating Copper Recovery by Heber Hernández, Martín Alberto Díaz-Viera, Elisabete Alberdi, Aitor Goti

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…This approach is compared with six supervised machine learning regression methods, namely, Decision Tree, Extra Tree, Support Vector Regression (linear and epsilon), Multilayer Perceptron, and Random Forest. For comparison purposes, an open access database representative of a porphyry copper deposit is used. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 1120

    Geostatistics and Artificial Intelligence Applications for Spatial Evaluation of Bearing Capacity after Dynamic Compaction by Rodney Ewusi-Wilson, Junghee Park, Boyoung Yoon, Changho Lee

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…The model performance is examined using the correlations between SPT-based and predicted bearing capacity in the context of mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (r2), and root mean square error (RMSE). …”
    Get full text
    Article