Showing 1,101 - 1,120 results of 1,673 for search 'forest (errors OR error)', query time: 0.15s Refine Results
  1. 1101

    Evapotranspiration Disaggregation Using an Integrated Indicating Factor Based on Slope Units by Linjiang Wang, Bingfang Wu, Weiwei Zhu, Abdelrazek Elnashar, Nana Yan, Zonghan Ma

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The validation in Huairou and Baotianman shows coefficients of determination of 0.9 and 0.91, respectively, and root mean square errors of 0.45 mm and 0.47 mm. Compared to the original 1 km resolution ET data, the disaggregated results show improved accuracy, with R<sup>2</sup> values increasing by 1% (Huairou) and 2% (Baotianman) and RMSE decreasing by 21% and 13%, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 1102

    Assessment of active fire detection in Serra da Canastra National Park using MODIS and VIIRS sensors by G. S. Pinto, H. Bernini, C. G. Messias, O. A. S. Silva, P. W. Cunha, P. S. Victorino, F. Morelli

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…The geographic data utilization for the occurrence of wildfires and forest fires for monitoring fire usage in vegetation has become increasingly important for generating information that aids in decision-making and policy development regarding climate change and its impacts. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 1103
  4. 1104

    Contribution to the research of Anthropometric measurements and comparison of body proportions in the student population in Bangladesh by Md Eanamul Haque Nizam, Emeritus Darko Ujevic, Ayub Nabi Khan

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an R2 score of 0.647 where the mean squared error value is 18.62, surpassing both linear regression and random forest models. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 1105
  6. 1106

    A machine learning-based method for predicting the shear behaviors of rock joints by Liu He, Yu Tan, Timothy Copeland, Jiannan Chen, Qiang Tang

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The results demonstrated that the MLPMs provided reliable predictions for shear stress, with the mean squared errors (MSEs) between their predicted and measured shear stress varying from 0.003 to 0.069 and the coefficients of determination (R2 values) varying from 0.964 to 0.998. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 1107
  8. 1108

    From data to decision: Alleviating poverty and promoting development through measuring the unmeasurable economic numbers by Emmanuel A. Onsay, Jomar F. Rabajante

    Published 2025-12-01
    “…Research on indigenous peoples typically takes a qualitative approach, whereas studies on poverty tend to be broad, making them susceptible to significant sampling errors and primarily intended for national policy-making. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 1109

    Present-day vegetation helps quantifying past land cover in selected regions of the Czech Republic. by Vojtěch Abraham, Veronika Oušková, Petr Kuneš

    Published 2014-01-01
    “…Vegetation proportions of 17 taxa were obtained by combining the CORINE Land Cover map with forest inventories, agricultural statistics and habitat mapping data. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 1110

    A hybrid model for improving customer lifetime value prediction using stacking ensemble learning algorithm by Amir Mohammad Haddadi, Hodjat Hamidi

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…., Elastic Net, Random Forest, XGBoost, and SVM. The results demonstrate that integrating those features and using the Stacking Ensemble model substantially increases the prediction accuracy and decreases the errors. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 1111

    Predictive Machine Learning Approaches for Supply and Manufacturing Processes Planning in Mass-Customization Products by Shereen Alfayoumi, Amal Elgammal, Neamat El-Tazi

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…While soft computing techniques are widely used for optimizing mass-customization products, they face scalability issues when handling large datasets and rely heavily on manually defined rules, which are prone to errors. In contrast, machine learning techniques offer an opportunity to overcome these challenges by automating rule generation and improving scalability. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 1112

    Global Ionospheric TEC Forecasting for Geomagnetic Storm Time Using a Deep Learning‐Based Multi‐Model Ensemble Method by Xiaodong Ren, Pengxin Yang, Dengkui Mei, Hang Liu, Guozhen Xu, Yue Dong

    Published 2023-03-01
    “…The test set results showed that the DLMEM model can reduce the root mean square errors (RMSE) by an average of 43.6% in comparison to our previously presented model Ion‐LSTM, especially during the recovery period of geomagnetic storms. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 1113

    Ammonia and ethanol detection via an electronic nose utilizing a bionic chamber and a sparrow search algorithm-optimized backpropagation neural network. by Yeping Shi, Yunbo Shi, Haodong Niu, Jinzhou Liu, Pengjiao Sun

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…It also outperforms the other models at regression prediction, with smaller absolute, mean absolute, and root mean square errors. Its coefficient of determination (R2) is greater than 0.99, surpassing those of the SVM and RF models. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 1114
  15. 1115

    Remaining Useful Life Estimation through Deep Learning Partial Differential Equation Models: A Framework for Degradation Dynamics Interpretation Using Latent Variables by Sergio Cofre-Martel, Enrique Lopez Droguett, Mohammad Modarres

    Published 2021-01-01
    “…The latest research efforts have focused on applying complex DL models to achieve low prediction errors rather than studying how they interpret the data’s behavior and the system itself. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 1116

    Robust Hybrid Data-Level Approach for Handling Skewed Fat-Tailed Distributed Datasets and Diverse Features in Financial Credit Risk by Musara Keith R, Ranganai Edmore, Chimedza Charles, Matarise Florence, Munyira Sheunesu

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…This approach was coupled with widely employed ensemble algorithms, namely the random forest (RF) and the extreme gradient boost (XGBoost). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 1117

    Understanding the environmental health implications of tourism on carbon emissions in China by Jinhua Shao, Sheng Fang, Meiling Zhao, Wanxin Qian, Cai Wang

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…Our findings demonstrate that sparrow search algorithm and random forest (SSA-RF) hybrid model can model the relationship between carbon emissions and tourism factors with low error. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 1118

    Pioneering machine learning techniques to estimate thermal conductivity of carbon-based phase change materials: A comprehensive modeling framework by Raouf Hassan, Alireza Baghban

    Published 2025-09-01
    “…Among them, CatBoost achieved the highest predictive performance with an R2 of 0.979 and the lowest mean squared error (MSE) of 0.006 on the test set. SHAP analysis revealed that nanoparticle concentration was the most influential feature. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 1119

    Visual–Inertial Autonomous UAV Navigation in Complex Illumination and Highly Cluttered Under-Canopy Environments by Leyang Zhao, Weixi Wang, Qizhi He, Li Yan, Xiaoming Li

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Subsequently, employs a high-dimensional error-state optimizer coupled with a low-dimensional height filter to achieve high-precision localization of the UAV in under-canopy environments. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 1120

    Data-Driven and Mechanistic Soil Modeling for Precision Fertilization Management in Cotton by Miltiadis Iatrou, Panagiotis Tziachris, Fotis Bilias, Panagiotis Kekelis, Christos Pavlakis, Aphrodite Theofilidou, Ioannis Papadopoulos, Georgios Strouthopoulos, Georgios Giannopoulos, Dimitrios Arampatzis, Evangelos Vergos, Christos Karydas, Dimitris Beslemes, Vassilis Aschonitis

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…By comparing the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) between predicted and observed cotton yield values across three ML algorithms, i.e., Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and LightGBM, the RF model achieved the lowest error (422.6 kg/ha), outperforming XGBoost (446 kg/ha) and LightGBM (449 kg/ha). …”
    Get full text
    Article