Showing 841 - 860 results of 1,673 for search 'forest (errors OR error)', query time: 0.11s Refine Results
  1. 841

    FEPP: Advancing Software Risk Prediction in Requirements Engineering Through Innovative Rule Extraction and Multi-Class Integration by Muhammad Binsawad, Bilal Khan

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…The accuracy analysis of the models is assessed critically using the precision, F-measure (FM), and Mathew’s correlation coefficient (MCC), as well as the error rate using the Kappa Statistic (KS) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 842

    Early Prediction of Battery Lifetime Using Centered Isotonic Regression with Quantile-Transformed Features by Muhammad Arslan Khan, Yixing Wang, Benben Jiang

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…To validate our proposed method, we have done a comprehensive comparison among several different benchmarks, including elastic net, gradient boosting regression tree, decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, and Gaussian process regression. In contrast to existing methods, our CIR model has shown the best performance, with an average percentage error of 9.8% and a root mean square error of 149 cycles. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 843

    Impact of Data Balancing and Feature Engineering on Accident Severity Models by Fayez ALANAZI, Aminu SULEIMAN

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Evaluation metrics such as Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Log Loss, Area under the Curve (AUC), and Area under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR) are employed. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 844

    Prediction of room temperature in Trombe solar wall systems using machine learning algorithms by Seyed Hossein Hashemi, Zahra Besharati, Seyed Abdolrasoul Hashemi, Seyed Ali Hashemi, Aziz Babapoor

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The accuracy of the algorithms was assessed using R² and root mean squared error (RMSE) values. The results demonstrated that the k-nearest neighbors and random forest algorithms exhibited superior performance, with R² and RMSE values of 1 and 0. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 845

    Improving network security using keyboard dynamics: A comparative study by Ugwunna, C.O., Chukwuogo, O.E., Alabi, O.A., Kareem, M.K., Belonwu, T.S., Oloyede, S.O.

    Published 2023-12-01
    “…Based on the comparing results, Random Forest outperforms the other models, suggesting that Random Forest can be used as the system model for Keystroke Dynamic authentication.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 846

    Traffic congestion forecasting using machine learning methods by Ramil R. Zagidullin, Almaz N. Khaybullin

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…The results demonstrate the superiority of the LSTM model over ARIMA and Random Forest in terms of predictive accuracy, as confirmed by visual comparison of forecasts with test data and by the mean squared error metric. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 847

    Machine learning model optimization for compressional sonic log prediction using well logs in Shahd SE field, Western Desert, Egypt by Khaled Saleh, Walid M. Mabrouk, Ahmed Metwally

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Model performance is optimized through hyperparameter tuning and evaluated using correlation coefficients and root mean square error (RMSE) metrics. Results indicate that ensemble models (Random Forest, CatBoost, XGBoost) achieve the highest accuracy, with correlation coefficients ranging from 89 to 89.6% and RMSE between 5.85 and 6.03. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 848

    An improved multiclass classification of acute lymphocytic leukemia using enhanced glowworm swarm optimization by Saranya N, Kalamani M

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Most of the diagnostic techniques like bone marrow aspiration, imaging techniques, etc. are time consuming, error-prone, costly and depend on the skill set of experts. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 849

    Comparison of spatial prediction models from Machine Learning of cholangiocarcinoma incidence in Thailand by Oraya Sahat, Supot Kamsa-ard, Apiradee Lim, Siriporn Kamsa-ard, Matias Garcia-Constantino, Idongesit Ekerete

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Model performance was evaluated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and R2 with 70:30 train-test validation. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 850

    Hybrid approaches enhance hydrological model usability for local streamflow prediction by Yiheng Du, Ilias G. Pechlivanidis

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…We investigate various post-processing methods, such as random forest, long short-term memory model, quantile mapping and generalised linear model, demonstrating notable improvements in model performance, in terms of reducing errors in total volume and extremes and increasing robustness across diverse climatic and geographic conditions. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 851

    SHERA: SHAP-Enhanced Resource Allocation for VM Scheduling and Efficient Cloud Computing by Ashwin Singh Slathia, Abhiram Sharma, P. B. Krishna, Saksham Anand, Ayush Rathi, Linda Joseph, Xiao-Zhi Gao

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Three machine learning models—Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were trained and assessed based on Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and an Equivalent Accuracy metric. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 852

    Research on Hyperspectral Inversion of Soil Organic Carbon in Agricultural Fields of the Southern Shaanxi Mountain Area by Yunhao Han, Bin Wang, Jingyi Yang, Fang Yin, Linsen He

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…The model achieved a coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.81, a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 1.54 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.37 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 853

    Construction and application of a TCN-LSTM-SVM-based time series prediction model for water inflow in coal seam roofs by Xuan LIU, Yadong JI, Kaipeng ZHU, Chunhu ZHAO, Kai LI, Chaofeng LI, Chenhan YUAN, Panpan LI, Pengzhen YAN

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…This model exhibited more accurate prediction results compared to the commonly used prediction models like backpropagation neural network (BPNN), random forest (RF), and Transformer while avoiding excessive errors produced by most of these models on the validation and test sets. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 854

    Design of Chinese traditional Jiaoyi (Folding chair) based on Kansei Engineering and CNN-GRU-attention by Xinyan Yang, Nan Zhang, Jiufang Lv, Jiufang Lv, Jiufang Lv

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Based on the top-ranked preference encoding, we designed a new Jiaoyi chair prototype, achieving significantly reduced prediction errors in final user testing (RMSE = 0.0034127, 0.0026915, 0.0035955).ConclusionThis research establishes a quantifiable intelligent design paradigm for modernizing cultural heritage through computational design.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 855
  16. 856

    Predicting Weaning Weight of Romanov Lambs From Biometric Measurements Before Weaning Age Using Machine Learning Algorithms by Mehmet Eroğlu, Ali Osman Turgut, Mürsel Küçük, Muhammed Furkan Önen

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…In contrast, the random forest and CatBoost models showed lower predictive performance, with higher errors in the test data. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 857
  18. 858

    Multi-Objective Optimal Scheduling of Water Transmission and Distribution Channel Gate Groups Based on Machine Learning by Yiying Du, Chaoyue Zhang, Rong Wei, Li Cao, Tiantian Zhao, Wene Wang, Xiaotao Hu

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…An example analysis demonstrates that the optimal feedforward time of the open channel gate group is negatively connected with the flow condition and that the method can manage the water distribution error within 13.97% and the water level error within 13%. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 859

    Mountain flood forecasting in small watershed based on loop multi-step machine learning regression model by Songsong Wang, Bo Peng, Ouguan Xu, Yuntao Zhang, Jun Wang

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…The traditional hydrodynamic and manual forecasting methods have high error rates for hourly forecasting. In order to improve the accuracy and real-time of water level forecasting in small watershed, we extract effective disaster-causing information, integrate multi-dimensional disaster-causing factors (such as hydrology, meteorology, geography, etc.), use a short-term prediction window and loop multi-step input method to improve the Machine Learning (ML) regression models’ accuracy, which can reduce the ML model’s process error. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 860

    TPE-LCE-SHAP: A Hybrid Framework for Assessing Vehicle-Related PM2.5 Concentrations by Hamad Almujibah, Abdulrazak H. Almaliki, Caroline Mongina Matara, Adil Abdallah Mohammed Elhassan, Khalaf Alla Adam Mohamed, Mudthir Bakri, Afaq Khattak

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…The TPE-tuned LCE model outperformed benchmark algorithms including Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) achieved the lowest Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.94, Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 21.50, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 4.64, Residual Standard Ratio (RSR) of 0.38, and the highest Coefficient of Determination (R2) of 0.87. …”
    Get full text
    Article