Showing 401 - 420 results of 1,673 for search 'forest (errors OR error)', query time: 0.13s Refine Results
  1. 401

    Quantifying solid volume of stacked eucalypt timber using detection-segmentation and diameter distribution models by Gianmarco Goycochea Casas, Zool Hilmi Ismail, Mathaus Messias Coimbra Limeira, Carlos Pedro Boechat Soares, José Marinaldo Gleriani, Daniel Henrique Brada Binoti, Carlos Alberto Araújo Júnior, Mohd Ibrahim Shapiai, Leonardo Ippolito Rodrigues, Tassius Menezes Araújo, Helio Garcia Leite

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…Traditional methods for estimating the volume of stacked timber, often reliant on manual measurements, are time-consuming and prone to error. This research aims to develop an accurate procedure for estimating the volume of stacked eucalypt timber in yards. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 402

    An Enhanced Tree Ensemble for Classification in the Presence of Extreme Class Imbalance by Samir K. Safi, Sheema Gul

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…Performance metrics such as classification error rate and precision are used for evaluation purposes. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 403
  4. 404

    Studies comparing the effectiveness of models for drying bitter gourd slices by Dinh Anh Tuan Tran, Tuan Nguyen Van, Thi Khanh Phuong Ho

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 405

    Towards enhancing field‐based vegetation monitoring: A deep learning approach for species coverage estimation from ground‐level imagery by Pauline Müller, Stefano Puliti, Johannes Breidenbach

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…We evaluated our method against an independent test set of 156 images and found a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 8.82% for blueberry and 3.49% for lingonberry and no substantial systematic errors. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 406

    Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Public Health: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine-Learning Algorithms in Predicting COVID-19 Mortality by Eric B. Weiser

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The four ML models were trained and tested on this dataset, with performance assessed using R2, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 407

    Leveraging Satellite Data for Predicting PM10 Concentration with Machine Learning Models: A Study in the Plains of North Bengal, India by Ayan Das, Manoranjan Sahu

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…Five different machine learning regression models, namely linear regression (LR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were employed and evaluated using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) along with R2 for predicting the daily ground-level PM10 concentration using AOD, land cover data, and meteorological parameters. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 408

    Apply Ridge Regression Model to Predict the Lateral Velocity Difference of Tight Reservoirs by HAN Longfei, ZHANG Yongfei, WANG Miaomiao, LI Yu

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…This error cannot meet the subsequent construction requirements. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 409

    Machine learning algorithms to predict the tensile strength of novel composite materials by S. Sathees Kumar, P. Shyamala, Pravat Ranjan Pati

    Published 2025-10-01
    “…Five regression algorithms such as polynomial regression, bagging regression, random forest, XGBoost, and gradient boosting were trained and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and standard error metrics. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 410

    Optimizing Methanol Injection Quantity for Gas Hydrate Inhibition Using Machine Learning Models by Mohammed Hilal Mukhsaf, Weiqin Li, Ghassan Husham Jani

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE), were KNN < DT < RF < XGBoost. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 411

    Unraveling the Scale Dependency of SIF-Based Phenology: Amplified Trends and Climate Responses by Xiufeng Chen, Yanbin Yuan, Tao Xiong, Sicong He, Heng Dong

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Our results showed that the 1-km resolution SIF had a significant advantage over the 5-km and 50-km resolution SIFs in terms of consistency with the extracted phenology results from the Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) sites, with mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 4.48 and 15.49 days for SOS and EOS, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 412

    Machine learning-based mapping of Acidobacteriota and Planctomycetota using 16 S rRNA gene metabarcoding data across soils in Russia by E. A. Ivanova, A. R. Suleymanov, D. A. Nikitin, M. V. Semenov, E. V. Abakumov

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Model interpration was performed using variable importance assessment and Shapley values. According to the error metrics, the Acidobacteriota model achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 6.67% and an R2 of 0.41, while the Planctomycetota model achieved an RMSE of 2.04% and an R2 of 0.46. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 413

    Application of Machine Learning for Predictive Analysis and Management of Mediterranean-Farmed Fish Mortalities: A Risk Management Case Study Using Apache Spark by Marios C. Gkikas, Dimitris C. Gkikas, Gerasimos Vonitsanos, John A. Theodorou, Spyros Sioutas

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…The performances of these models are analyzed and properly demonstrated using metrics including the Mean Squared Error (MSE), R-squared (R<sup>2</sup>), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Concordance Index (C-index). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 414

    Distribution Ratio Prediction of Major Components in 30%TBP/kerosene-HNO3 System Based on Machine Learning by YU Ting1, ZHANG Yinyin2, ZHANG Ruizhi3, JIN Wenlei2, LUO Yingting2, ZHU Shengfeng3, HE Hui1, YE Guoan1, GONG Helin4

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Since the traditional mathematical model of uranium distribution ratio leads to at least 15% prediction error, in this paper, three classical machine learning models (namely, random forest, support vector regression and K-nearest neighbor) were constructed to predict the distribution ratios of uranium, plutonium, and HNO3 in the 30%TBP/kerosene-HNO3 system. …”
    Article
  15. 415

    BIM-Based Machine Learning Application for Parametric Assessment of Building Energy Performance by Panagiotis Tsikas, Athanasios Chassiakos, Vasileios Papadimitropoulos, Antonios Papamanolis

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…However, alternative designs should be checked individually, and this makes the process time-consuming and prone to errors. Machine learning techniques can provide valuable assistance in developing decision support tools. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 416

    Exploring Machine Learning Models for Vault Safety in ICL Implantation: A Comparative Analysis of Regression and Classification Models by Qing Zhang, Qi Li, Zhilong Yu, Ruibo Yang, Emmanuel Eric Pazo, Yue Huang, Hui Liu, Chen Zhang, Salissou Moutari, Shaozhen Zhao

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…Model performance was evaluated using metrics including the mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) for regression models, while accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were used for classification models. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 417

    Efficient Swell Risk Prediction for Building Design Using a Domain-Guided Machine Learning Model by Hani S. Alharbi

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…On an 80:20 stratified hold-out set, this simplified model reduced root mean square error (RMSE) from 9.0% to 6.8% and maximum residuals from 42% to 16%. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 418

    Automated Computer Vision System for Urine Color Detection by Ban Shamil Abdulwahed, Ali Al-Naji, Izzat Al-Rayahi, Ammar Yahya, Asanka G. Perera

    Published 2023-03-01
    “…In the comparison with the current methods the proposed system has maximum accuracy and minimum error rate. This methodology can pave the way for an additional case study in medical applications, particularly in diagnosis, and patient health monitoring. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 419

    Ensemble machine learning (EML) based regional flood frequency analysis model development and testing for south-east Australia by Nilufa Afrin, Ataur Rahman, Ahmad Sharafati, Farhad Ahamed, Khaled Haddad

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…The findings indicate that ensemble methods (RFR and GBR) provide better performance than the standalone ANN technique. The median relative error values are found to be in the range of 33–44 % for the RFR, 34–46 % for the GBR, and 35–53 % for the ANN. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 420

    A Lightweight Received Signal Strength Indicator Estimation Model for Low-Power Internet of Things Devices in Constrained Indoor Networks by Samrah Arif, M. Arif Khan, Sabih ur Rehman

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…The experimental results show that the RFR(F) method shows approximately 39.62% improvement in Mean Squared Error (MSE) over the Feature-based ANN(F) model and 37.86% advancement over the state-of-the-art. …”
    Get full text
    Article